Perhaps, in my subconscious, Danny Kaye was my inspiration! (Now I need to
focus on getting better and getting back to work.)
> On Jun 15, 2016, at 9:24 AM, Quentin Long wrote:
>
> sez Dar Scott:
>> Be careful! There are some things you can do with 'do'
>> but can't send with 'send'. Also, as
sez Dar Scott:
> Be careful! There are some things you can do with 'do'
> but can't send with 'send'. Also, as I recall, not all you
> can 'call' can lend itself to 'send'. I've seen things that
> 'do' did but sent d'n't. Also, a sending pending is not
> the same as a do doing since a pending s
Hi Scott,
> Am 15.06.2016 um 02:00 schrieb Scott Rossi :
> On 6/14/16, 1:20 PM, "use-livecode on behalf of Klaus major-k"
>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dar,
>>> Am 14.06.2016 um 22:13 schrieb Dar Scott :
>>> Now that is goofy. Why would that work and Scott's not?
>> well, that's a rhetorical question, rig
On 6/14/16, 1:20 PM, "use-livecode on behalf of Klaus major-k"
wrote:
>Hi Dra,
>
>> Am 14.06.2016 um 22:13 schrieb Dar Scott :
>>
>> Now that is goofy. Why would that work and Scott's not?
>
>well, that's a rhetorical question, right? ;-)
>
>I added an appropriate comment to the bug report!
>
I kept expecting it to turn into a full blown tale of daring "do", a "call"
to arms, and code troops sending pending. Thanks for the time you 'put into
it', I like 'the result'
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Dar Scott wrote:
> Actually not! I have just gotten over some under-the-weather and I
Actually not! I have just gotten over some under-the-weather and I need to get
back to work. Work, Dar, work! But, I am feeling a lot better.
I just wanted to say that send is much like do but I forgot what the
differences were.
> On Jun 14, 2016, at 4:37 PM, Phil Davis wrote:
>
> Dar
Dar clearly has too much time on his hands. ;-)
Phil Davis
On 6/14/16 3:34 PM, Mike Bonner wrote:
I've read this 3 times now and I'm still fascinated.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Dar Scott wrote:
Be careful! There are some things you can do with 'do' but can't send
with 'send'. Als
I've read this 3 times now and I'm still fascinated.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Dar Scott wrote:
> Be careful! There are some things you can do with 'do' but can't send
> with 'send'. Also, as I recall, not all you can 'call' can lend itself to
> 'send'. I've seen things that 'do' did b
ture ;-)
> Good to know this!
>
>
> Sent from solidit
>
> -Original Message-
> From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf
> Of Klaus major-k
> Sent: dinsdag 14 juni 2016 22:08
> To: How to use LiveCode
> Subject: Re: st
Ah well, I was hoping.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Klaus major-k wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> > Am 15.06.2016 um 00:00 schrieb Mike Bonner :
> >
> > Silly question but.. Is the image id that you're setting your windowshape
> > to an imported image or a referenced image? While it doesn't explain t
Hi Mike,
> Am 15.06.2016 um 00:00 schrieb Mike Bonner :
>
> Silly question but.. Is the image id that you're setting your windowshape
> to an imported image or a referenced image? While it doesn't explain the
> 2nd window having a windowshape and the first not (unless both do have
> windowshapes
Silly question but.. Is the image id that you're setting your windowshape
to an imported image or a referenced image? While it doesn't explain the
2nd window having a windowshape and the first not (unless both do have
windowshapes set...) ,it might explain why the windowshape for the first is
blan
The whole thing is goofy. Why is openStack behaving like preOpenStack
just because it's a non-standard window style?
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Systems
Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
__
Of course. It is a bug. Bugs are supposed to act strange.
> On Jun 14, 2016, at 2:20 PM, Klaus major-k wrote:
>
> Hi Dra,
>
>> Am 14.06.2016 um 22:13 schrieb Dar Scott :
>>
>> Now that is goofy. Why would that work and Scott's not?
>
> well, that's a rhetorical question, right? ;-)
>
Hi Dra,
> Am 14.06.2016 um 22:13 schrieb Dar Scott :
>
> Now that is goofy. Why would that work and Scott's not?
well, that's a rhetorical question, right? ;-)
I added an appropriate comment to the bug report!
> Did you remember the "in 5 seconds" for his?
>From the card script:
...
sen
Now that is goofy. Why would that work and Scott's not?
Did you remember the "in 5 seconds" for his?
> On Jun 14, 2016, at 2:07 PM, Klaus major-k wrote:
>
> Hi Dar,
>
>> Am 14.06.2016 um 21:51 schrieb Dar Scott :
>>
>> Without knowing the context and just adding random things:
>>
>> send
ubject: Re: strange experience in Windows standalone with windowshape
Hi Dar,
> Am 14.06.2016 um 21:51 schrieb Dar Scott :
>
> Without knowing the context and just adding random things:
>
> send "go next card" to me in 5 seconds
that was the next thing to try, and YES,
Hi Dar,
> Am 14.06.2016 um 21:51 schrieb Dar Scott :
>
> Without knowing the context and just adding random things:
>
> send "go next card" to me in 5 seconds
that was the next thing to try, and YES, that actually works! :-)
>> On Jun 14, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Scott Rossi wrote:
>>
>> Hi Klaus
Hi Scott,
> Am 14.06.2016 um 21:38 schrieb Scott Rossi :
>
> Hi Klaus:
>
> I may not have seen all your responses, but did you try adding "with
> messages" to your code or delaying the card advance using "end in"?
>
> wait 5 secs with messages
>
> Or:
>
> send "goNextCard" to me in 5 seconds
Without knowing the context and just adding random things:
send "go next card" to me in 5 seconds
> On Jun 14, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Scott Rossi wrote:
>
> Hi Klaus:
>
> I may not have seen all your responses, but did you try adding "with
> messages" to your code or delaying the card advance u
Hi Klaus:
I may not have seen all your responses, but did you try adding "with
messages" to your code or delaying the card advance using "end in"?
wait 5 secs with messages
Or:
send "goNextCard" to me in 5 seconds
command goNextCard
go next cd
end goNextCard
Regards,
Scott Rossi
Creative
I'll keep my fingers crossed that its located and fixed. If I find a
reliable recipe I'll report it, but so far no luck. (the same standalone
does sometimes start correctly. Annoying!)
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Paul Dupuis wrote:
> On 6/14/2016 11:47 AM, Mike Bonner wrote:
> > Paul, I'v
On 6/14/2016 11:47 AM, Mike Bonner wrote:
> Paul, I've seen this too. Launch a standalone and it doesn't show. I've
> only seen this when using the browser widget as part of the build. (haven't
> really used other widgets, so I can't speak for those) If I then go into
> task manager and tell it
Paul, I've seen this too. Launch a standalone and it doesn't show. I've
only seen this when using the browser widget as part of the build. (haven't
really used other widgets, so I can't speak for those) If I then go into
task manager and tell it to create a dump file for my application, poof..
i
On 6/14/2016 9:56 AM, Klaus major-k wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> i have a stack with a "splash" screen which has an windowshape set.
>
> I has a script like this:
> on opencard
> wait 5 secs
> go next cd
> end opencard
>
> In a standalone on a Mac, everything works as exspected, on Windows
> I see NOTH
Hi Paul,
> Am 14.06.2016 um 16:48 schrieb Paul Dupuis :
>
> On 6/14/2016 9:56 AM, Klaus major-k wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> i have a stack with a "splash" screen which has an windowshape set.
>>
>> I has a script like this:
>> on opencard
>> wait 5 secs
>> go next cd
>> end opencard
>>
>> In a s
Hi all,
i have a stack with a "splash" screen which has an windowshape set.
I has a script like this:
on opencard
wait 5 secs
go next cd
end opencard
In a standalone on a Mac, everything works as exspected, on Windows
I see NOTHING for 5 secs and then second card of this stack appear and
the
27 matches
Mail list logo
