On my IDE, mainstacks is currently 204. The stacks are stored in a linked list,
so no limit other than memory and performance.
Thanks,
Brian
On Aug 6, 2018, 7:14 AM -0500, Stephen MacLean via use-livecode
, wrote:
>
> > On Aug 6, 2018, at 8:05 AM, Paul Dupuis via use-livecode
> > wrote:
> >
>
> On Aug 6, 2018, at 8:05 AM, Paul Dupuis via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> On 8/5/2018 11:29 PM, Stephen MacLean via use-livecode wrote:
>> @ Paul, they are different, based upon the type of build that needs to
>> happen for the source that is being looked at. The code has one handler name
>> th
On 8/5/2018 11:29 PM, Stephen MacLean via use-livecode wrote:
> @ Paul, they are different, based upon the type of build that needs to happen
> for the source that is being looked at. The code has one handler name that is
> the same (The init code in the builder), but after that the code is diffe
Hi Paul and Monte,
Thanks for the input!
@ Monte, I might be able to order the initial query so that they are grouped
together by builder type. Then I could process those together with doing one
load and unload for that group
@ Paul, they are different, based upon the type of build that needs
On 8/5/2018 8:51 PM, Stephen MacLean via use-livecode wrote:
> Any insight is appreciated!
>
I use a lot of library stacks, but our model is to load them on startup
and unload on shutdown (not really necessary singe the engine does this
on quit). Unless you have zillions of lines of code, I am not
My main thought is if we are talking about loading and unloading thousands of
times then script parsing may become costly. How costly I’m not sure… script
parsing is pretty fast.
> On 6 Aug 2018, at 10:51 am, Stephen MacLean via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am currently using libr
Hi All,
I am currently using library stacks that contain what I call custom builders,
that are livecode script libraries. These stacks have code for specific
instances and when done, I currently unload them. I like that I can use these,
and build them, on the fly, bringing that code in without
The defaultFolder of a standalone is the home folder of the app itself, if I am
not mistaken. You can change the defaultFolder in which case it will become
that.
What I decided to do at some point in the past was have a settings card where
the user can select a working folder, without which co
Am I missing something really basic? I created a new stack and all I put
into its script was some code to change the defaultFolder to the stack's
folder, 'start using' a script-only stack in the same folder, and call the
only handler in that scrip-only stack (which creates an answer popup).
This a
ly and not download...
>
> Note added! thanks again.
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/start-using-stack-tp4665159p4665311.html
> Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ___
good idea true, although one could deal with that security issue voluntarily
by giving rights to execute only and not download...
Note added! thanks again.
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/start-using-stack-tp4665159p4665311.html
Sent from the
ownload a stack from a folder "covered" by LC
> server! Thanks a lot for taking a look at that!
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/start-using-stack-tp4665159p46
stack from a folder "covered" by LC
server! Thanks a lot for taking a look at that!
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/start-using-stack-tp4665159p4665307.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mail
legacy stacks to RUN,
> SHOULD not affect the simple READ & LOAD of a stack from another via "GO
> STACK URL.." !? or?
>
> I checked the MIME types in my cp panel, and am surprised that no mime type
> exist for livecode, lc rev...??
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/start-using-stack-tp4665159p4665298.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this
> Target stack :
> target stack on nabble
> <
> http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/file/n4665288/drawings.livecode
> >
> target Stack on on-rev
> target stack on on-rev
> <http://rman.on-rev.com/stacks/LC6BIN/drawings.livecode>
>
>
>
>
ion.278305.n4.nabble.com/file/n4665288/drawings.livecode
2) on on-rev : http://rman.on-rev.com/stacks/LC6BIN/drawings.livecode
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/start-using-stack-tp4665159p4665296.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing li
on.278305.n4.nabble.com/file/n4665288/drawings.livecode>
target Stack on on-rev
target stack on on-rev
<http://rman.on-rev.com/stacks/LC6BIN/drawings.livecode>
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/start-using-stack-tp4665159p4665294.htm
Hi Alex,
Am 23.05.2013 um 15:20 schrieb Alex Tweedly :
> OK, I have to confess I'm confused :-(
>
> I thought you were trying to run a script on LC server (on-rev) and having
> trouble getting "start using stack" to work.
>
> But the testing stack below is ac
OK, I have to confess I'm confused :-(
I thought you were trying to run a script on LC server (on-rev) and
having trouble getting "start using stack" to work.
But the testing stack below is actually a desktop stack which does a "go
stack URL ..." ??
So - if
g LEOPARD 10.7.4) [file opening bug on max
os x and rev 4.0]
<http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/anyone-know-how-to-fix-that-silly-stack-file-opening-bug-on-mac-os-x-and-rev-4-0-td348151.html>
??
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/sta
The stack that you are going to use on your on-rev server... save it in legacy
format... that seems to do the trick !
> Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 11:56:00 +0100
> From: a...@tweedly.net
> To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Subject: Re: start using stack
>
> It's all too
t:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/start-using-stack-tp4665159p4665284.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, uns
thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/start-using-stack-tp4665159p4665284.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.run
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:51 PM, John Dixon wrote:
>
>> Mike...
>>
>> I would like to use a stack on the on-rev server from within a mobile
>> app... looking at the dictionary 'go url' is not available to iOS
>>
>> > Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 16:43
lable to iOS
>
> > Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 16:43:51 -0600
> > Subject: Re: start using stack
> > From: bonnm...@gmail.com
> > To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> >
> > If you're talking about remotely putting a stack in use from a desktop
> app,
> > you
On 20 May 2013, at 23:51, John Dixon wrote:
> Mike...
>
> I would like to use a stack on the on-rev server from within a mobile app...
> looking at the dictionary 'go url' is not available to iOS
That's because this would be against the iOS developer agreement. The only
downloadable code you'
Mike...
I would like to use a stack on the on-rev server from within a mobile app...
looking at the dictionary 'go url' is not available to iOS
> Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 16:43:51 -0600
> Subject: Re: start using stack
> From: bonnm...@gmail.com
> To: use-livecode@lists.run
v server ?
> If so, how do I write the 'start using stack' command ?
>
> 'www.mydomain.com/mystack'
> 'http://mydomain.com/mystack'
> 'http://www.mydomain.com/mystack'
>
> none of these seem to work ? Am I barking up the wrong tr
Can I put a stack into the message path that is on the on-rev server ?
If so, how do I write the 'start using stack' command ?
'www.mydomain.com/mystack'
'http://mydomain.com/mystack'
'http://www.mydomain.com/mystack'
none of these seem
30 matches
Mail list logo
