On 07/04/2015 11:20 AM, Klaus major-k wrote:
according to TextEdit it is still REVO7000 with LC 8 dp 2.
Oppps, sory, stackfileversion is also still -> 7.0
Thanks. Yeah, I had opened a stack with 0xEd and seen the header, but I
wasn't sure if the stackfileversion was staying the
> Am 04.07.2015 um 20:15 schrieb Klaus major-k :
>
> Hi Mark,
>
>> Am 04.07.2015 um 20:06 schrieb Mark Wieder :
>>
>> Could someone with a working LC 8.x tell me what the latest stackfileversion
>> is? I'm attempting to future-proof some code and L
Hi Mark,
> Am 04.07.2015 um 20:06 schrieb Mark Wieder :
>
> Could someone with a working LC 8.x tell me what the latest stackfileversion
> is? I'm attempting to future-proof some code and LC 8.0 is non-functional on
> linux. The Release Notes.pdf that comes with LC
Could someone with a working LC 8.x tell me what the latest
stackfileversion is? I'm attempting to future-proof some code and LC 8.0
is non-functional on linux. The Release Notes.pdf that comes with LC 8.0
is amusing in a nostalgic sort of way but otherwise not much help.
--
Mark W
Just save the stack. You don't need to use Save as or set stackFileVersion --
when the stack is saved in v7 it can use the features of that version.
Regards,
Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media UX/UI Design
> On May 2, 2015, at 10:36 AM, Peter Haworth wrote:
>
> I hav
I'm subjected to the problem that LC wants to open the "saved as"
stack and has a problem because there's already a stack in memory with the
same name. Finally clicked enough buttons to get out of that, closed LC,
reran it, opened the "saved as" version of the stack
Probably unrelated, but I have noticed that text that has been produced in a
PDF via their OCR tool will have hidden characters in it that will prevent me
from inserting or updating records in my SQL database with that data. The SQL
generates an error as though there were nothing beyond the firs
as is?
> > -- Tom Bodine
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/stackfileversion-and-locking-6-5-2-tp4688290p4688300.html
> > Sent from the Revolution - User mailing li
he new
> stack format while leaving the legacy stack as is?
> -- Tom Bodine
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/stackfileversion-and-locking-6-5-2-tp4688290p4688300.html
> Sent from the Revo
nabble.com/stackfileversion-and-locking-6-5-2-tp4688290p4688300.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and m
0, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Geoff Canyon wrote:
>
>> I have a stack that I moved to 7.0.2 for a few days without thinking, and
>> I want to move it back. I tried this in the message box:
>>
>>
>> set the stackfileversion to 5.5;lock messages;save stack
>> "versionPr
t I moved to 7.0.2 for a few days without thinking, and
> I want to move it back. I tried this in the message box:
>
>
> set the stackfileversion to 5.5;lock messages;save stack
> "versionProblem";close stack "versionProblem"
>
>
> and after that if I o
I have a stack that I moved to 7.0.2 for a few days without thinking, and I
want to move it back. I tried this in the message box:
set the stackfileversion to 5.5;lock messages;save stack
"versionProblem";close stack "versionProblem"
and after that if I open it in 6.5.2
13 matches
Mail list logo
