Re: sqLite in Memory

2012-06-18 Thread Dr. Hawkins
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote: > The OP has requested we let this issue go, and I'm rather in favor of that > myself.  This will be my last post in this thread (my previous one would > have been my last but I couldn't resist the opportunity to use the word > "fiat" ). The

Re: sqLite in Memory

2012-06-18 Thread Richard Gaskin
Bob Sneidar wrote: > I am not weighing in one way or the other on this conversation, but > I had to make the point: When did "Democratic" become a synonym for > "fair"? It isn't. The words have very different origins and meanings. And though I recognize that the majority of civilization's hist

Re: sqLite in Memory

2012-06-18 Thread Bob Sneidar
I am not weighing in one way or the other on this conversation, but I had to make the point: When did "Democratic" become a synonym for "fair"? I would can both words and instead approach this from the perspective of expediency. It would be expedient for the person who controls the Nabble list t

Re: sqLite in Memory

2012-06-18 Thread Bob Sneidar
wer is yes. :) >> > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/sqLite-in-Memory-tp4650695p4650702.html > Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _

Re: sqLite in Memory

2012-06-16 Thread Igor de Oliveira Couto
Richard, I do understand and appreciate your points. However: On 16/06/2012, at 11:06 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: > If nothing else, consider this democratically: > > Either multiple people must make a modest change, or one person must make a > modest change. I am looking at this in the most dem

Re: sqLite in Memory

2012-06-16 Thread Richard Gaskin
Igor de Oliveira Couto wrote: > On 16/06/2012, at 1:48 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: > >> If the message got here, by definition it's not a "wrong" address. >> >> Apparently both addresses wind up here so both are correct. > > I believe the old address is kept because of users that have to > /choose

Re: sqLite in Memory

2012-06-15 Thread Mike Bonner
Oops, I'd like to day I knew that, but I didn't. Thx for the correction! On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Peter Haworth wrote: > Not specifying a db file name actually creates a temporary disk file, which > is deleted when you close it. To get an in-memory db, use a db name of > ":memory:".

Re: sqLite in Memory

2012-06-15 Thread Igor de Oliveira Couto
On 16/06/2012, at 1:48 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: > If the message got here, by definition it's not a "wrong" address. > > Apparently both addresses wind up here so both are correct. I believe the old address is kept because of users that have to /choose to continue to use it, as pointed out pre

Re: sqLite in Memory

2012-06-15 Thread Richard Gaskin
Igor de Oliveira Couto wrote: > In any event, it is probably more helpful of you if you offer > to assist those using the *wrong* address to the list, rather > than asking those who are using the *right* address to change. If the message got here, by definition it's not a "wrong" address. Appar

Re: sqLite in Memory

2012-06-15 Thread Jerry Jensen
On Jun 15, 2012, at 8:23 PM, Igor de Oliveira Couto wrote: > > If I can reconfigure my filters and cataloguing system, I'm sure they can do > *that*. Igor, get over it. .Jerry ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit

Re: sqLite in Memory

2012-06-15 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 6/15/12 10:23 PM, Igor de Oliveira Couto wrote: Considering that there seems to be only 2 or 3 regular "repeat offenders", I will try to send messages privately to them, rather than to the list. You may have missed the message from one person who reads and replies from the Nabble archives.

Re: sqLite in Memory

2012-06-15 Thread Mark Wieder
Igor- Friday, June 15, 2012, 8:23:02 PM, you wrote: > to show them how to update their address books? If I can reconfigure > my filters and cataloguing system, I'm sure they can do *that*. :-) Well, unfortunately it's not that easy. As has been pointed out, nabble uses the old addressing form, s

Re: sqLite in Memory

2012-06-15 Thread Igor de Oliveira Couto
Apologies to all - my intention was not to 'spam the listserver': On 16/06/2012, at 1:04 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: > There's no reason to spam the listserv with an autoreply. That's a > good way to get banned. Just fix your email filter. It's not rocket > science. If you need help, Google it. Cons

Re: sqLite in Memory

2012-06-15 Thread Mark Wieder
Peter- Friday, June 15, 2012, 5:46:41 PM, you wrote: > Not specifying a db file name actually creates a temporary disk file, which > is deleted when you close it. To get an in-memory db, use a db name of > ":memory:". ! Thanks. I'm filing that away. -- -Mark Wieder mwie...@ahsoftware.net __

Re: sqLite in Memory

2012-06-15 Thread Mark Wieder
Igor- Friday, June 15, 2012, 7:33:18 PM, you wrote: > Please note: There's no reason to spam the listserv with an autoreply. That's a good way to get banned. Just fix your email filter. It's not rocket science. If you need help, Google it. -- -Mark Wieder mwie...@ahsoftware.net

Re: sqLite in Memory

2012-06-15 Thread Igor de Oliveira Couto
Please note: On 16/06/2012, at 10:20 AM, Alejandro Tejada wrote: > Interesting... coincidence. :-D > > http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/ancient-aliens > Messages that are sent to the OLD list address ("use-revolution" instead of "use-livecode") are not recognised in my mail system as part of the

Re: sqLite in Memory

2012-06-15 Thread Peter Haworth
Not specifying a db file name actually creates a temporary disk file, which is deleted when you close it. To get an in-memory db, use a db name of ":memory:". Pete On Jun 15, 2012 4:13 PM, "Mike Bonner" wrote: > Don't specify a database name and it will open the db in memory. > > get revopendatab

Re: sqLite in Memory

2012-06-15 Thread Alejandro Tejada
Interesting... coincidence. :-D http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/ancient-aliens Mike Bonner wrote > > I think alien brain and poofy hair are linked genetic traits. > So the answer is yes. :) > -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/sqLi

Re: sqLite in Memory

2012-06-15 Thread Mike Bonner
I think alien brain and poofy hair are linked genetic traits. So the answer is yes. :) On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote: > Ah! Too simple for my enlarged alien brain! (Or is my hair just poofy?) > > Thanks, Bob > > > On Jun 15, 2012, at 4:13 PM, Mike Bonner wrote: > > > Don't s

Re: sqLite in Memory

2012-06-15 Thread Bob Sneidar
Ah! Too simple for my enlarged alien brain! (Or is my hair just poofy?) Thanks, Bob On Jun 15, 2012, at 4:13 PM, Mike Bonner wrote: > Don't specify a database name and it will open the db in memory. > > get revopendatabase("sqlite",,) --not sure how many commas off the top > of my head. >

Re: sqLite in Memory

2012-06-15 Thread Mike Bonner
Don't specify a database name and it will open the db in memory. get revopendatabase("sqlite",,) --not sure how many commas off the top of my head. On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote: > I am just certain that I read on this forum that you could create an > sqLite database in

sqLite in Memory

2012-06-15 Thread Bob Sneidar
I am just certain that I read on this forum that you could create an sqLite database in memory! But when looking through the dictionary and in the LiveCode lessons there seems to be no mention of how! Can someone point me to the right docs for this? Bob _