On 09/07/2011 04:27 AM, Timothy Miller wrote:
"O Romeo, Romeo! wherefore art thou Romeo?"
The 'wherefore' here means "why?" rather than "where?"
What Juliet is asking, in allusion to the feud between her Capulet family and
Romeo's Montague clan, is 'Romeo, why are you a Montague?'.
Give me "
On 09/07/2011 12:43 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 9/6/11 1:38 PM, Richmond Mathewson wrote:
back to "Application Browser" and there one can see, at the bottom of
the list (ou, a fond [ excusez moi, sans accents ] as they say in
France) "revPropertyPalette 1" created
On 09/06/2011 11:23 PM, FlexibleLearning wrote:
The persistent mis-use of this word REALLY annoys me!
'Wherefore' is 'Why' in modern parlance, and not (nor has ever been)
'where'.
Indeed, a veritable excess of curmudgeonliness Mr Chips.
Back to your normal browsing.
Hugh Senior
FLCo
_
"O Romeo, Romeo! wherefore art thou Romeo?"
The 'wherefore' here means "why?" rather than "where?"
What Juliet is asking, in allusion to the feud between her Capulet family and
Romeo's Montague clan, is 'Romeo, why are you a Montague?'.
Tim
On Sep 6, 2011, at 1:23 PM, FlexibleLearning wrote:
On 9/6/11 1:38 PM, Richmond Mathewson wrote:
back to "Application Browser" and there one can see, at the bottom of
the list (ou, a fond [ excusez moi, sans accents ] as they say in
France) "revPropertyPalette 1" created 'on-the-fly'
as it-were, from some mysterio
Wherefore is "why". Juliet set the bar.
Craig Newman
-Original Message-
From: FlexibleLearning
To: use-livecode
Sent: Tue, Sep 6, 2011 12:25 pm
Subject: Re: Wherefore revPropertyPalette
The persistent mis-use of this word REALLY annoys me!
'Wherefore'
Beer don't know no good speaking.
Bob
On Sep 6, 2011, at 1:23 PM, FlexibleLearning wrote:
> The persistent mis-use of this word REALLY annoys me!
>
> 'Wherefore' is 'Why' in modern parlance, and not (nor has ever been)
> 'where'.
>
> Back to your normal browsing.
>
> Hugh Senior
> FLCo
>
>
The persistent mis-use of this word REALLY annoys me!
'Wherefore' is 'Why' in modern parlance, and not (nor has ever been)
'where'.
Back to your normal browsing.
Hugh Senior
FLCo
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visi
>
> I've never come across that. I suppose unless it can be
reduplicated we
> should
> doubt your claim.
>
>> Pete Molly's Revenge
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>>
>>> Mark
Schonewille wrote:
>>>
>>>> I
On 09/06/2011 10:50 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
Like when your children have grandchildren, or when you make a bunch of copies
of a form, then hand out the original and have to use one of the copies next
time you make more.
All I can say is that if computer programming were as easy as fathering
c
Like when your children have grandchildren, or when you make a bunch of copies
of a form, then hand out the original and have to use one of the copies next
time you make more.
Actually, it's not like either of those things. NVM
Bob
On Sep 6, 2011, at 12:28 PM, Pete wrote:
> "reduplicated"?
.
> Pete
> Molly's Revenge <http://www.mollysrevenge.com>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Richard Gaskin
> wrote:
>
>> Mark Schonewille wrote:
>>
>>> In this case, the blank line is because the revPropertyPalette is a cloned
>>>
e never come across that. I suppose unless it can be reduplicated we
should
doubt your claim.
Pete
Molly's Revenge<http://www.**mollysrevenge.com<http://www.mollysrevenge.com>
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Richard Gaskin
**wrote:
Mark Schonewille wrote:
In this case, the blank
;
> I've never come across that. I suppose unless it can be reduplicated we
> should
> doubt your claim.
>
> Pete
>> Molly's Revenge<http://www.**mollysrevenge.com<http://www.mollysrevenge.com>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue,
://www.facebook.com/marksch
On 6 sep 2011, at 21:02, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Mark Schonewille wrote:
In this case, the blank line is because the revPropertyPalette is a cloned
stack without a stackfile on disk. The revPropertyPalettes exist in memory
only, while only one original exists on disk.
Ah, right
/xtalkprogrammer
KvK: 50277553
Send me a friend request on Facebook if you like
https://www.facebook.com/marksch
On 6 sep 2011, at 21:02, Richard Gaskin wrote:
> Mark Schonewille wrote:
>> In this case, the blank line is because the revPropertyPalette is a cloned
>> stack without a stackfi
d.
I've never come across that. I suppose unless it can be reduplicated we
should
doubt your claim.
Pete
Molly's Revenge<http://www.mollysrevenge.com>
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Richard Gaskin
wrote:
Mark Schonewille wrote:
In this case, the blank line is because the
ww.mollysrevenge.com>
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Richard Gaskin
wrote:
> Mark Schonewille wrote:
>
>> In this case, the blank line is because the revPropertyPalette is a cloned
>> stack without a stackfile on disk. The revPropertyPalettes exist in memory
>> only, w
Mark Schonewille wrote:
In this case, the blank line is because the revPropertyPalette is a cloned
stack without a stackfile on disk. The revPropertyPalettes exist in memory
only, while only one original exists on disk.
Ah, right: that was "the stacks", and not "the windows&q
Hi,
In this case, the blank line is because the revPropertyPalette is a cloned
stack without a stackfile on disk. The revPropertyPalettes exist in memory
only, while only one original exists on disk.
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
OK, OK; I'm behind in the race ( 4.5 ), but then, even if I had the money,
I would feel a bit queer about buying things with numbers after a second
fullstop:
So: crack open 4.5. dp 4 and the Application browser: no revPropertypalette
[and, this is extremely UNsurprising, as I have no
dunbarx wrote:
If I open a new LC session with any simple stack and call "the stacks", I see the
revmenubar, revMessageBox and whatever stack I opened with (I opened the msg box by hand). If I
then open the inspector for the stack and call "the stacks" I get a blank line in the
middle of the
f the list. I assume that is where
the inspector sort of lies.
Now I can find files for stacks like the message boxand revTools. But I cannot
find anything for "revPropertyPalette". And why the blank line? Shy?
Craig Newman
-Original Message-
From: Richard Gaskin
To: use-li
In a message dated 9/6/11 12:06:27 PM, m.schonewi...@economy-x-talk.com
writes:
> Hi Joe,
>
> I am having the same problem with revPropertyPalette. I don't expect it to
> get fixed. In any case, don't save it :-) I don't think that saving it
> makes sense, i
Joe wrote:
I've been having this problem for a long time, but I've just been living
with it. Almost every time I open the inspector it asks me to save the
revPropertyPalette. I've been doing that but it keeps coming back. What am I
doing
wrong?
It seems that the Inspector h
Hi Joe,
I am having the same problem with revPropertyPalette. I don't expect it to get
fixed. In any case, don't save it :-) I don't think that saving it makes sense,
if it doesn't make things worse.
If you can't ungroup a group, that group probably contains nested
with it. Before my time, though.
I still program in HC. And besides LC, nothing else.
Craig Newman
-Original Message-
From: LunchnMeets
To: use-livecode
Sent: Tue, Sep 6, 2011 7:43 am
Subject: revPropertyPalette
Hi,
I've been having this problem for a long time, but
Hi,
I've been having this problem for a long time, but I've just been living
with it. Almost every time I open the inspector it asks me to save the
revPropertyPalette. I've been doing that but it keeps coming back. What am I
doing
wrong?
Another problem I've been havin
28 matches
Mail list logo