On 5/24/19 10:25 AM, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote:
However in this case the lax parsing of repeat is not benign - you can
write a 'repeat with' statement which looks like it is 100% correct but
does not do what you expect:
i.e. repeat with i = 1 to 10 by 2 -- ignores the 'by' cla
On 2019-05-23 08:42, ambassador--- via use-livecode wrote:
After re-reading the release notes I think this is probably the result
of bug 20951 being squashed @
https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=20951
That sounds like it.
Yup - that's the one.
The LCS parser is very lax, it tends n
On 5/23/19 9:14 AM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote:
I just put "put 5 times empty" into the message box and got 5.
I don't get that when I try it. I first of all get an error message
about not finding the handler, and then it displays "5". But the
displayed value is a side effect of the
It may have passed in the past (ahem) because the engine might have thought you
were trying to multiply 5 by empty, and if that is allowed (empty interpreted
as 1) then the parser would go, "Okay, sure!"
I just put "put 5 times empty" into the message box and got 5. "put 5 times"
also gives me
Unless you were a bug, and then it might be perfectly fine.
Bob S
> On May 22, 2019, at 23:57 , Richmond via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> If syntax is invalid it is WRONG, and does not need to be flagged as
> anything, just corrected.
>
> If I write: The dog me bit.
>
> It is wrong: it is no
:-)
> On May 23, 2019, at 06:37 , Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> That's why Sanskrit pundits are working for AI at Microsoft, because
>
> Order Language Syntax matter does not
>
> BR
>
> David V Glasgow wrote:
>
>What if Yoda you are?
__
That's why Sanskrit pundits are working for AI at Microsoft, because
Order Language Syntax matter does not
BR
David V Glasgow wrote:
What if Yoda you are?
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subs
What if Yoda you are?
> On 23 May 2019, at 7:57 am, Richmond via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> If I write: The dog me bit.
>
> It is wrong: it is not a bug, nor a regression.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this
If syntax is invalid it is WRONG, and does not need to be flagged as
anything, just corrected.
If I write: The dog me bit.
It is wrong: it is not a bug, nor a regression.
Richmond.
On 23.05.19 9:42, ambassador--- via use-livecode wrote:
andrew at midwestcoastmedia.com wrote:
I realize ther
andrew at midwestcoastmedia.com wrote:
I realize there are better and more efficient ways to construct that
loop, but the fact that the original code does not throw an error in
9.0.5rc1 but does throw an error in 9.5dp1 made it seem like a
regression.
If the syntax is invalid, flagging it as a
I realize there are better and more efficient ways to construct that
loop, but the fact that the original code does not throw an error in
9.0.5rc1 but does throw an error in 9.5dp1 made it seem like a
regression.
After re-reading the release notes I think this is probably the result
of bu
Hi.
What Ludovic suggests is not just a shortCut. You can say:
repeat 5
or repeat 5 times
but you could never say:
repeat with y =1 to 5 times
It is not a regression, that is, something in the latest v.9 build, it is
bad syntax.
Craig
--
Sent from:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nab
> Le 21 mai 2019 à 20:24, Andrew Bell via use-livecode
> a écrit :
>
> I'm excited to try some of the new features of LC 9.5 but found a regression
> that has me dead in the water. Went to file a bug report, but 9.0.5 is the
> newest version listed. (I realize the team is busy in San Jose th
I'm excited to try some of the new features of LC 9.5 but found a
regression that has me dead in the water. Went to file a bug report,
but 9.0.5 is the newest version listed. (I realize the team is busy in
San Jose this week)
Now that I'm a slightly more seasoned coder I know there are more
14 matches
Mail list logo
