On Jan 14, 2016, at 6:06 AM, Ben Rubinstein wrote:
> So if the device is vertical at rest (y=-1), and falls down vertically, it
> won't register any acceleration because it's already measuring the maximum in
> that axis?
>
> In short, it's static acceleration rather than dynamic acceleration, i
On Jan 14, 2016, at 6:06 AM, Ben Rubinstein wrote:
> So if the device is vertical at rest (y=-1), and falls down vertically, it
> won't register any acceleration because it's already measuring the maximum in
> that axis?
>
> In short, it's static acceleration rather than dynamic acceleration, i
;> The device can't measure actual acceleration. It measures the forces on
>> sensors in 3 axes. One of those axes will feel force from gravity. That's
>> the 1.
>> Jim
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ben Rubinstein [mailto:benr...@cogapp.com]
:benr...@cogapp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 5:08 AM
To: Use LiveCode
Subject: mobile acceleration/rotation
H - I've just tried reading the acceleration and rotation sensors. I
admit to finding the whole business confusing, but it seems to me that the
data accompanying t
2016 5:08 AM
To: Use LiveCode
Subject: mobile acceleration/rotation
H - I've just tried reading the acceleration and rotation sensors. I
admit to finding the whole business confusing, but it seems to me that the
data accompanying the accelerationChanged message represents the static
ori
H - I've just tried reading the acceleration and rotation sensors. I
admit to finding the whole business confusing, but it seems to me that the
data accompanying the accelerationChanged message represents the static
orientation of the device.
At first I thought that the "rotation" and "ac
