Re: leap to future

On 2016-02-25 02:40, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami wrote: We were told in no uncertain terms, "not gonna happen." It is important to understand that LiveCode Community and LiveCode Indy are distinct things. Whilst Community offers a proper subset of functionality to Indy at the moment that is by

Re: leap to future

On 2016-02-24 22:58, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami wrote: But it is my understanding that we can deploy HTML5 from community "for free" assuming that we do not need to lock up the code. You can download the Community version of LiveCode from our servers at no cost. However, usage of the Communit

Re: leap to future

On 25/02/2016 01:48, Richard Gaskin wrote: Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami wrote: > It's still baffling, as it would seem to be a no-brainer to turn on > the HTML5 Standalone builder option in the Indy version and turn off > the option to encrypt it if you had not paid for HTML5... > > Again res

Re: leap to future

Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami wrote: > It's still baffling, as it would seem to be a no-brainer to turn on > the HTML5 Standalone builder option in the Indy version and turn off > the option to encrypt it if you had not paid for HTML5... > > Again response was "not gonna happen." > > So there comes

Re: leap to future

  @ stephen: "I don't think the OSS folks get HTML5. If they did, then I would have it in my 'Indy' license... ( I really don't like that term ) "  Right, that would be the obvious conclusion but You can look back in the list.. I had a "tough round" of discussion (me complaining; HQ ex

Re: leap to future

On 24/02/2016 22:15, stephen barncard wrote: On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami < bra...@hindu.org> wrote: But it is my understanding that we can deploy HTML5 from community "for free" assuming that we do not need to lock up the code. I don't think the OSS folks get

Re: leap to future

On 24/02/2016 21:58, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami wrote: But it is my understanding that we can deploy HTML5 from community "for free" assuming that we do not need to lock up the code. Correct? and if so, will this policy stick in the "leap forward" As far as I know, this will be true for the

Re: leap to future

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami < bra...@hindu.org> wrote: > But it is my understanding that we can deploy HTML5 from community "for > free" assuming that we do not need to lock up the code. > I don't think the OSS folks get HTML5. If they did, then I would have it in

Re: leap to future

But it is my understanding that we can deploy HTML5 from community "for free" assuming that we do not need to lock up the code. Correct? and if so, will this policy stick in the "leap forward" ?? On February 24, 2016 at 2:34:45 AM, Stephen MacLean (smacl...@madmansoft.com

Re: leap to future

> On Feb 24, 2016, at 3:14 AM, Peter TB Brett wrote: > > On 24/02/2016 03:11, James Hale wrote: >> Soon after HTML5 was released I too remembered Kevin's announcement and >> wondered why I was not seeing HTML5 in my license. >> I wrote to support and soon after HTML5 appeared in my license for

Re: leap to future

On 24/02/2016 03:11, James Hale wrote: Soon after HTML5 was released I too remembered Kevin's announcement and wondered why I was not seeing HTML5 in my license. I wrote to support and soon after HTML5 appeared in my license for all LC8's. So I am not sure what to make of the response from suppo

Re: leap to future

Soon after HTML5 was released I too remembered Kevin's announcement and wondered why I was not seeing HTML5 in my license. I wrote to support and soon after HTML5 appeared in my license for all LC8's. So I am not sure what to make of the response from support stating they are separate as for me,

Re: leap to future

Thanks everyone. That's what I did. Have a great day. On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Matthias Rebbe | M-R-D < matthias_livecode_150...@m-r-d.de> wrote: > Hi Shawn, > > the lifetime license from the 1st Kickstarter campaign is for all > platforms Livecode supported at the time when the Kickstar

Re: leap to future

Hi Shawn, You may need to re-license your copy of LC specifically for HTML5 deployment. Login to your account at livecode.com and see what licenses you have. You’ll see the HTML5 license separately. I have both HTML5 and Indy, but need to re-license my copy specifically for HTML5 when I want

Re: leap to future

Hi Shawn, the lifetime license from the 1st Kickstarter campaign is for all platforms Livecode supported at the time when the Kickstarter campaign ran and for all new platforms Livecode will support in future. That is a fact and already confirmed by Kevin in several posts and emails. If your li

Re: leap to future

Well, when I launched LC and try to build HTML 5, I have a button that says Buy Now. I then saw Kevin's comments here. Perhaps I'm mistaken. I hope so. If so, I apologize in advance :) On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 7:33 AM, Kay C Lan wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Shawn Blc > wrote: >

Re: leap to future

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Shawn Blc wrote: > I purchased a lifetime license on the kickstarter campaign... Cheated! > > How have you come to that conclusion. Didn't you receive an email on or about 23Jul14 from Kevin stating: As you know, you will receive a HTML5 license as per the agreem

Re: leap to future

se-livecode on behalf of -hh" > > wrote: > > >Kevin M. wrote: > >> see in detail https://livecode.com/leap-to-future/ > > > >Yes, LC is great, worth its pricing, even if one is not using > >any of Monte's iOS externals: The other core-developers wil

Re: leap to future

William Prothero wrote: Richard: By the way, I didn’t find totally transparent, how to use your link to upload a file, very transparent when it came to standalones. I did figure it out after a lot of head-scratching and posted a link on this list, to the way i did it. http://es.earthednet.org/S

Re: leap to future

Richard: By the way, I didn’t find totally transparent, how to use your link to upload a file, very transparent when it came to standalones. I did figure it out after a lot of head-scratching and posted a link on this list, to the way i did it. http://es.earthednet.org/SoftwareForEducation

Re: leap to future

Michael Doub wrote: > SFTP might not be the best thing in the world but I have yet to see > a hosting site that does not support it. They support SMTP too but, like SFTP, there are so many great tools out there that few of us need to make our own mail clients. What are you building? > From

Re: leap to future

SFTP might not be the best thing in the world but I have yet to see a hosting site that does not support it. I have been waiting patiently for it for too long now. I am not at all interested in doing server side scripting but I would like to have the ability to manage files on my server. S

Re: leap to future

Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami wrote: > SFTP was not on the list! That's continues to be such an irritation > that this is not prioritized. > > see bug: bug 6405 > Please, everyone go and vote. The voting system was retired years ago. For the sake o

Re: leap to future

Your leap the future was a bit challenging for me to read. Because of one outstanding issue. SFTP was not on the list! That's continues to be such an irritation that this is not prioritized. see bug: bug 6405 Please, everyone go and vote. Ple

Re: leap to future

;> see in detail https://livecode.com/leap-to-future/ > >Yes, LC is great, worth its pricing, even if one is not using >any of Monte's iOS externals: The other core-developers will >have more time for their valuable work by that personal expanding. > >But sadly your explanat

leap to future

Kevin M. wrote: > see in detail https://livecode.com/leap-to-future/ Yes, LC is great, worth its pricing, even if one is not using any of Monte's iOS externals: The other core-developers will have more time for their valuable work by that personal expanding. But sadly your explanation