> Tom G. wrote:
> Is it to have an easier time testing html 5 features?. is it to turn it
> into a product?
The SE and the messaging between the standalones is already basically done
in earlier parts of my html5 samples.
To improve the scriptEditor (which is 80% codeMirror) and build the mess
I should left out the world "defense"...
A big compliment for making this. This project shows the potential of the HTML5
LiveCode builder beside all your other contributions related to HTML5 LiveCode
which is a great help for others.
On 27/11/2019, 00:03, "use-livecode on behalf of hh via us
Wow. very impressive..may I ask the reason why you created this?
Is it to have an easier time testing html 5 features?. is it to turn it
into a product?
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 6:03 PM hh via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> A few more words in defense of the
A few more words in defense of the HTML5 standalone builder:
Enjoy html5IDE v100_alpha. A LC-playground with 'integrated'
propertyInspector, dictionary, scriptEditor and tools.
http://hyperhh.de/html5/html5IDE.html
You can create objects, edit their properties and their script.
Moreover there is
