Re: discrepancy between official device metric and LC stack size

As my school Maths teacher said, many years ago: "You go into the house before going up the stairs." Although, to be fair, LiveCode is a bit warped insofar as you "go into the house, and then down into the cellar." Best, Richmond. On 14/2/2018 7:33 am, Nicolas Cueto via use-livecode wrote:

Re: discrepancy between official device metric and LC stack size

​Ok. Took Jacque's advice​, and my stack's working screenRect is 0,24,360,592. Now I'm unsure whether my stack's size is 360 x 592, or (width = item 3 - item) x (height = item 4 -item 2). Thanks. -- Nicolas Cueto On 2 February 2018 at 17:53, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode < use-livecode@list

Re: discrepancy between official device metric and LC stack size

On 1/31/18 5:23 PM, Nicolas Cueto via use-livecode wrote: I test my mobile stacks on a Nexus 5, and, in portrait orientation, many bottom pixels are offscreen, even though for width and height I follow exactly the numbers given in dp at the website Device Metrics .

RE: discrepancy between official device metric and LC stack size

ation Services rdim...@evergreeninfo.net -Original Message- From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf Of Nicolas Cueto via use-livecode Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 6:24 PM To: How to use LiveCode Cc: Nicolas Cueto Subject: discrepancy between official de

discrepancy between official device metric and LC stack size

I test my mobile stacks on a Nexus 5, and, in portrait orientation, many bottom pixels are offscreen, even though for width and height I follow exactly the numbers given in dp at the website Device Metrics . Why is it cut off? And how can I avoid this? Is there an LC