Bernd:
> A new version of Code Folding has been uploaded
That's a good effort. Thanks!
Best wishes,
Curry Kenworthy
Radically Innovative Christian LiveCode Development
"PASSION for Elegant, Efficient Code!"
https://livecodeconsulting.com/
_
A new version of Code Folding has been uploaded to the Forum
https://forums.livecode.com/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=38912&p=229971#p229971
It addresses a couple of bugs and has been tested to work from 9.6.9 up to
9.6.12 (RC1) and 10.0.0 (DP8)
Kind regar
ann, Bernd via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> >
> > For all those interested in Code Folding a new version has been posted
> to the forum. Easier install and some minor bug fixes.
> >
> >
> https://forums.livecode.com/viewtopic.php
This is a long time coming.
Bob S
> On Feb 22, 2024, at 5:40 AM, Niggemann, Bernd via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> For all those interested in Code Folding a new version has been posted to the
> forum. Easier install and some minor bug fixes.
>
> https://forums.livecode.
For all those interested in Code Folding a new version has been posted to the
forum. Easier install and some minor bug fixes.
https://forums.livecode.com/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=38912&p=228244&sid=2a60c9420c1615aca35c5957252b7d8e#p228244
Kind r
i was just about to ask if it still folded tags :-)
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 8:41 AM Niggemann, Bernd via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> Dear list
>
> I posted a stack on the Forum that temporarily installs Code Folding to LC
> version 9.6.9, 9.6.10, 9.6.
Dear list
I posted a stack on the Forum that temporarily installs Code Folding to LC
version 9.6.9, 9.6.10, 9.6.11, or 10.0.0 DP 7. These changes are lost when
closing LC
Future versions might make changes to the installation stack necessary
depending on the IDE changes in those versions
Hi Andy,
thanks for testing, very helpful.
It is reassuring that "Fold All" now works for you.
Kind regards
Bernd
AndyP wrote
> Hi Bernd,
>
> Great, that sorted the problem.
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/code-foldin
under cursor colour picker /
finder.
http://www.pointandsee.co.uk - made with LiveCode
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/code-folding-tp4708589p4708609.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
this.. you may want to look at this enhancement request..
>> http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6937
>> <http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6937>
>>
>> On LC 8.1 Win 10, folding individual handlers work great but not fold
>> all.
--
Vi
t; Thanks for this.. you may want to look at this enhancement request..
> http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6937
> <http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6937>
>
> On LC 8.1 Win 10, folding individual handlers work great but not fold all.
--
View this messa
e with LiveCode
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/code-folding-tp4708589p4708605.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runr
Thanks for this!
Fold All doesn’t work here though..
fold-unfold for a single handler does.
BR
On 9/18/16, 10:25 AM, "use-livecode on behalf of BNig"
wrote:
Maybe I should have added that folding takes time.
I tested against the livecodeIDE file with nearly 12000 lines of co
t a
> second.
>
> Unfold All for 12000 lines is a little more than a second, less for smaller
> scripts.
>
> toggling fold/unfold by using "fold-Unfold" is nearly instantaneous.
>
> Kind regards
> Bernd
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context
.
toggling fold/unfold by using "fold-Unfold" is nearly instantaneous.
Kind regards
Bernd
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/code-folding-tp4708589p4708590.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at
This is for the adventurous of the community. Some file swapping involved.
I modified the Script Editor of Livecode 8.1.0 stable to allow basic code
folding. This is experimental so you should not try this on your valuable
work, only on copies.
I tested it and did not have any data loss but still
16 matches
Mail list logo