Re: cREVGeneral

2011-01-09 Thread Mark Wieder
from day to day that have no real significance, and get recreated easily by > the IDE. I wouldn't bother with cREVGeneral at all. The IDE will generate and/or overwrite values there at will. The only thing I'd consider is whether revOnline stores the stack fingerprint in there. I can&

Re: cREVGeneral

2011-01-09 Thread David Bovill
2011/1/9 Björnke von Gierke > I doubt that you can intercept messages for these properties... unless the > internal handling is happening in the backscript, then you could catch em in > the frontscript? > Yes - that's what I would do - use a front script to redirect calls to c

Re: cREVGeneral

2011-01-09 Thread Björnke von Gierke
lly created custom > properties before exporting stacks as text files. This is the handler I'm > using to strip: > > command objectArray_CleanGeneral @customArray >> delete local customArray ["cREVGeneral"]["bookmarks"] >> delete local custo

Re: cREVGeneral

2011-01-09 Thread David Bovill
For instance what if I get rid of "revUniqueID" - would this be recreated - what is it used for? ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://

cREVGeneral

2011-01-09 Thread David Bovill
I'm stripping a few things out of the automagically created custom properties before exporting stacks as text files. This is the handler I'm using to strip: command objectArray_CleanGeneral @customArray >delete local customArray ["cREVGeneral"]["bookmarks&quo