Re: bringing a field of a sub-sub group to the for for editing

2015-01-19 Thread Dr. Hawkins
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Peter M. Brigham wrote: > Not sure if I know what you have in mind, but I wouldn't use a separate > stack over the field being edited. My output is basically shingled in rows, and I write the rows to the card from top to bottom (which keeps tab order correct, t

Re: bringing a field of a sub-sub group to the for for editing

2015-01-18 Thread Peter M. Brigham
On Jan 17, 2015, at 10:40 AM, Dr. Hawkins wrote: > I have fields in generated pages which are editable. > > The pages are constructed by placing groups, which in turn all belong to > another (turned out that, at least in the IDE, it is far, far faster to > delete that one group than to loop & del

bringing a field of a sub-sub group to the for for editing

2015-01-17 Thread Dr. Hawkins
I have fields in generated pages which are editable. The pages are constructed by placing groups, which in turn all belong to another (turned out that, at least in the IDE, it is far, far faster to delete that one group than to loop & delete). Anyway, some of the fields can be multi-ine, and coul