Graham-
Tuesday, September 24, 2013, 8:58:34 AM, you wrote:
> I'm interested in your ability to parse xml files in order to
> determine the structure - my guess is that you must have a foolproof
> method of dealing with dead ends. In my small experiments I was
> surprised to see that some of the
Mark - fair enough: I acknowledge my unfamiliarity. My cries of pain were
amplified by the fact that I couldn't do anything on the internet for a whole
week apart from see emails by imposing on friends or using an expensive G3
connection. So I was trying to learn with inadequate materials. My pr
Graham-
Monday, September 23, 2013, 12:44:15 PM, you wrote:
> the inability of the revXML series of handlers to allow one to
> analyse the structure of an XML in the abstract without knowing the
> names of all the tags, or whatever they're called, and the exact
> parenthetical structure.
My gues
Hi Kay
Thanks for that really interesting insight. I think I'll do exactly what you
say: what I want to do is to draw elevation graphs, simply to fill in a gap in
the way this particular GPS data is presented by its native editor. I just want
to extract a set (or array) of lines which are name
What is it you exactly want to do with the gps data?
About 18 months back I needed to work with gps data and obvioulsy chose LC
for the project and logically the XML functions for the job. Like you, I
had a great deal of trouble with XML but soon realised that the gpx files
were so well 'worded' t
Graham-
Wednesday, September 18, 2013, 9:19:50 AM, you wrote:
>
...
> The file seems to be well-formed, apart from the fact that the
> first child node is found by revXML to be "gpx/metadata", and I
> can't see the closure for the metadata tag at the other end of the
> document. In fact the d
I have been asked to do some work on some GPX files: these files originate from
GPS devices, and are in XML format. I've never had to deal with XML before, so
I have been trying to learn how to do so from the LC user manual - from about
page 189. There is a sample XML file and a discussion of t