I'm considering a project that will be pretty straightforward, but it will have
lots of external mp3 files that I've always managed with a player before. I've
got various versions of 6.x and 7 I could work with, but with quicktime
deprecated (?) and a new player object I&#x
Hey, i'm sending a laptop to a friend in another state, and am going to be
installing a version of LC community for them to play with. The laptop is
a mac core 2 duo (white.) I'm trying to decide WHICH version to send. For
reliability and speed, i'm leaning towards a NON 7
Richmond wrote:
> On 15/01/15 21:51, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>> Throughout the forums and the bugs reports I've been following
>> I've seen fairly regular references to Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, the
>> most recent Long-Term Support release the project has.
>
> That's good to know :)
>
> Last I heard they w
On 15/01/15 21:51, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Richmond wrote:
>> On 15/01/15 16:34, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
>>
>> Pretty much standardized.
...
>> An RC believes that all bugs are taken care of, and is only making
>> sure of this.
>
> Why do I have a funny feeling that RunRev probably know that?
Because
Richmond wrote:
>> On 15/01/15 16:34, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
>>
>> Pretty much standardized.
...
>> An RC believes that all bugs are taken care of, and is only making
>> sure of this.
>
> Why do I have a funny feeling that RunRev probably know that?
Because they're described in similar terms at the
On 15/01/15 20:31, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Richmond
wrote:
On 15/01/15 16:34, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:56 PM, John Dixon
wrote:5.5 if you want stability; it is late-beta quality.
Some report stability on 6.6, apparently.
6.7 and 7.0 are lat
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Richmond
wrote:
> On 15/01/15 16:34, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:56 PM, John Dixon
>> wrote:5.5 if you want stability; it is late-beta quality.
>>
>> Some report stability on 6.6, apparently.
>>
>> 6.7 and 7.0 are late and early alpha quali
On 15/01/15 16:34, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:56 PM, John Dixon wrote:
Yes, but my question really is..
'What is the reason for having all theses different versions being updated
more or less at the same time ?'...
Life was much simpler when you knew the version with the lar
John Dixon wrote:
Why are there different versions of liveCode being updated..
LC 7.0- updated 23 October 2014
LC 7.0.1 - updated 18 December 2014
LC 6.7.0 - updated 18 December 2014
LC 6.7.1 - updated 9 January 2015
Which one is considered to be the 'one' to use ?
As with most softwa
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:56 PM, John Dixon wrote:
> Yes, but my question really is..
> 'What is the reason for having all theses different versions being updated
> more or less at the same time ?'...
> Life was much simpler when you knew the version with the largest number
> stuck on the end of
Brave new world
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] Im Auftrag
von John Dixon
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Januar 2015 11:50
An: How to use LiveCode
Betreff: RE: Which version...
Just made a standalone for a stack I'm worki
-
"Some are born coders, some achieve coding, and some have coding thrust upon
them." - William Shakespeare & Hugh Senior
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Which-version-tp4687842p4687854.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mai
> Subject: Re: Which version...
>
> As far as I know (which isn't saying much):
>
> LC 6.6.x = maintenance of 'old generation' versions (e.g. carbon)
> LC 6.7.x = 'new generation' stuff like cocoa, excluding UniCode
> LC 7.x.x = all 'new generati
n legacy stacks
LC 6.7 is for those wanting 'new generation' features but who don't want
UniCode
LC 7 is the future and the base on which they are building LC 8 (and
presumabely HTML5 too)
So - as to which version you should use - depends on what you're working on!
If you are c
n...@lists.runrev.com] Im Auftrag
> von John Dixon
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Januar 2015 08:57
> An: How to use LiveCode
> Betreff: RE: Which version...
>
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> Yes, but my question really is..
> 'What is the reason for having all theses different versi
... I forgot to answer your question which version to use.
If you need one of the new features of version 7 (see version info), then
you go with 7.x
If not, I personally would stay with 6.x until 7.x is more stable and more
bugs are solved (see list)
This is only my personal advice
Tiemo
world (yet)
Tiemo
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] Im Auftrag
von John Dixon
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Januar 2015 08:57
An: How to use LiveCode
Betreff: RE: Which version...
Hi Dave,
Yes, but my question really is..
'W
s they say, were history ?
being pedantic, but I will ask again... Which is the version to use ?...
Dixie
> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 23:47:31 -0800
> From: d...@applicationinsight.com
> To: use-revolut...@lists.runrev.com
> Subject: Re: Which version...
>
> Hi John
>
> I
ing thrust upon
them." - William Shakespeare & Hugh Senior
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Which-version-tp4687842p4687843.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_
Why are there different versions of liveCode being updated..
LC 7.0- updated 23 October 2014
LC 7.0.1 - updated 18 December 2014
LC 6.7.0 - updated 18 December 2014
LC 6.7.1 - updated 9 January 2015
Which one is considered to be the 'one' to use ?
Dixie
20 matches
Mail list logo
