Graham Samuel wrote:
> Just a quick two Eurocents to say that I strongly agree that we
> should not split up the list, and I agree with Malte's arguments.
I don't think we need to worry about that. Those who want to lighten
their In Box and enjoy platform-specific discussion will find the forum
Just a quick two Eurocents to say that I strongly agree that we should not
split up the list, and I agree with Malte's arguments. I know nothing about
Linux, and like many things I know nothing about, I'm scared of it - but one
day I may need to know more and if and when that happens I would wan
Malte Brill wrote:
> Right now I am in a situation where I MUST support Linux as a
> platform of choice for my customers.
Welcome to the club.
I used to be a Mac-only guy, and I used to resent having to work in
Windows. But the more platforms I use xTalks on, the easier they all
get. These
Richmond,
Thanks for the CAD links. Once again you've shown your value to the list.
(smile)
I had not heard of either MEDUSA4 and Draftsight.
Joe Wilkins
Architect
On Feb 25, 2012, at 11:57 AM, Richmond wrote:
> On 02/25/2012 08:27 PM, Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote:
>> Frankly, Richmond, though I a
Thanks for all who chimed in, especially Richard for the very detailed post.
A few thoughts on Joes suggestion first...
I do not think it would be a good idea to split the list into platform specific
ones. We would all use a lot of expertise, as if the lists are devided people
will tend to only
Warren, what can I say! I have a meeting with a young man from China tomorrow
and I guess that is where my mind is. I guess it is probably Sunday where he
lives right now. (smile)
Regardless, that is still my opinion.
Joe Wilkins
Architect
On Feb 25, 2012, at 11:56 AM, Warren Samples wrote:
>
On 02/25/2012 09:56 PM, Warren Samples wrote:
On 02/25/2012 12:27 PM, Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote:
Just MHO on a Sunday morning,
Joe Wilkins
Architect
It's Saturday.
Religious fervour?
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Pl
On 02/25/2012 08:27 PM, Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote:
Frankly, Richmond, though I almost always enjoy your commentaries, I would really like to
see LC lists for both Linux and iOS diverted to special lists for those two topics;
particularly as newbies to either of these variants of LC "stumble" thei
On 02/25/2012 12:27 PM, Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote:
Just MHO on a Sunday morning,
Joe Wilkins
Architect
It's Saturday.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscrip
tting the Linux version up to spec.
>> Perhaps when the home team can see the same ROI from the Linux
>> engine as they clearly do with the mobile platforms, it will be a
>> different story.
>>
>> As much as I personally dislike the mobile platforms, it's hard to
.
Perhaps when the home team can see the same ROI from the Linux
engine as they clearly do with the mobile platforms, it will be a
different story.
As much as I personally dislike the mobile platforms, it's hard to deny
or complain about the growth in both LC user base and new revenue.
he home team can see the same ROI from the Linux
engine as they clearly do with the mobile platforms, it will be a
different story.
As much as I personally dislike the mobile platforms, it's hard to deny
or complain about the growth in both LC user base and new revenue.
DeeCee
--
Vie
On 02/23/2012 11:20 AM, Malte Brill wrote:
Thanks for the feedback so far guys.
Andre: I also have that impression. Now, what can we do to get it up to speed?
With Linux I am always unsure if I just forgot to install something that LC
depends on. A simple example: Under UBUNTU an app of mine j
ge in context:
> http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/The-Linux-engine-tp4410393p4414496.html
> Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.run
Hmmm, SunOS and X11R4?
Tim
On Feb 23, 2012, at 10:02 AM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
> You know what would be great? If someone wrote a graphics engine based
> entirely upon PDF! Yeah that would be the ticket! And then, you could print
> directly to PDF because everything would already be in the correc
nd don't have any issues like
>this.
>Warren
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/The-Linux-engine-tp4410393p4414496.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
u
You know what would be great? If someone wrote a graphics engine based entirely
upon PDF! Yeah that would be the ticket! And then, you could print directly to
PDF because everything would already be in the correct format! Yeah! ;-)
Bob
On Feb 23, 2012, at 5:37 AM, Warren Samples wrote:
> On 0
7;s problem? Who cares? You have to
> be able to read the IDE to use it.
>
> Peter
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/The-Linux-engine-tp4410393p4413072.html
> Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive
even though that OS has am 87% share.
So I feel the level of effort RunRev puts into their Linux engine is
admirable in many respects, provided they're able to meet a baseline of
core competence for deployment on that platform.
The good thing about the Linux engine situation is one of
On 02/23/2012 01:50 AM, Peter Alcibiades wrote:
I've more or less stopped using Rev because I only use Linux, and having got
a 22 inch monitor, I simply can't read most of the IDE unless I reset screen
resolution to much lower resolution. Or put on reading glasses which brings
its own problems.
On 02/23/2012 03:20 AM, Malte Brill wrote:
I figured out so much that this is a GNOME (working) versus KDE (not working)
thing. What really scares me is the exit on signal 11 issue. How does one debug
that???
Not that this is of any practical value, but this is an issue with
compositing. If
Thanks for the feedback so far guys.
Andre: I also have that impression. Now, what can we do to get it up to speed?
With Linux I am always unsure if I just forgot to install something that LC
depends on. A simple example: Under UBUNTU an app of mine just looks like it
should. No problem with th
ution.278305.n4.nabble.com/The-Linux-engine-tp4410393p4413072.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage
Hi Malte,
In short :
The engine is rock solid and as unbreakable as you can expect (cgi mode, shell
interface and all non GUI uses).
The IDE is a little more capricious but nothing insurmountable after some
arrangement against the X11 desktop GUI (KDE, Gnome).
About OpenSuse : just my prefer
Malte,
I think the linux engine and IDE is not as good as their siblings on MacOS
X and Windows. The redraw routines used to be slower than the others but I
haven't tested it since the latest graphical reorganization.
But with MacOS X getting more and more like iOS and Windows being Windo
Hi all,
I know a few of you are using Linux as a primary platform.
As I am rather green with Linux, I wonder if you care to share your experiences
regarding robustness of the engine. I sometimes peek at the IDE under UBUNTU
and wonder if I can rely on the engine the same way I can under Mac an
26 matches
Mail list logo
