Oh - I missed that. Cant find a reference to it on Google?
On Wed, 6 May 2015 at 20:54, J. Landman Gay
wrote:
> On 5/6/2015 3:42 AM, David Bovill wrote:
>
> > So is it a good idea to implement a curl based Livecode library in the
> > present state of Livecode builder?
>
> I thought a networking o
On 5/6/2015 3:42 AM, David Bovill wrote:
So is it a good idea to implement a curl based Livecode library in the
present state of Livecode builder?
I thought a networking overhaul was coming up in the stretch goals.
Though if someone wants to work on it now, I'm sure the team wouldn't
mind. T
David:
Thanks for addressing this. It looks like those trying to implement these
protocols go through enough agony, and the need is strong enough so that a
better support system is needed.
Thanks again,
Bill
William A. Prothero
http://es.earthednet.org/
> On May 6, 2015, at 1:42 AM, David Bovi
The blocking aspects of some of then http calls - the documentation and
issues around the lack of some REST capbabilities, and then quirks with
working with http and related protocols in the wild make me think that the
strategy of relying simply on socket primitives and getting the mothership
or Li
