Re: discrepancy between official device metric and LC stack size

2018-02-14 Thread Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode
As my school Maths teacher said, many years ago: "You go into the house before going up the stairs." Although, to be fair, LiveCode is a bit warped insofar as you "go into the house, and then down into the cellar." Best, Richmond. On 14/2/2018 7:33 am, Nicolas Cueto via use-livecode wrote:

Re: discrepancy between official device metric and LC stack size

2018-02-14 Thread Nicolas Cueto via use-livecode
​Ok. Took Jacque's advice​, and my stack's working screenRect is 0,24,360,592. Now I'm unsure whether my stack's size is 360 x 592, or (width = item 3 - item) x (height = item 4 -item 2). Thanks. -- Nicolas Cueto On 2 February 2018 at 17:53, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode < use-livecode@list

Re: discrepancy between official device metric and LC stack size

2018-02-02 Thread J. Landman Gay via use-livecode
On 1/31/18 5:23 PM, Nicolas Cueto via use-livecode wrote: I test my mobile stacks on a Nexus 5, and, in portrait orientation, many bottom pixels are offscreen, even though for width and height I follow exactly the numbers given in dp at the website Device Metrics .

RE: discrepancy between official device metric and LC stack size

2018-01-31 Thread Ralph DiMola via use-livecode
ation Services rdim...@evergreeninfo.net -Original Message- From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf Of Nicolas Cueto via use-livecode Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 6:24 PM To: How to use LiveCode Cc: Nicolas Cueto Subject: discrepancy between official de

discrepancy between official device metric and LC stack size

2018-01-31 Thread Nicolas Cueto via use-livecode
I test my mobile stacks on a Nexus 5, and, in portrait orientation, many bottom pixels are offscreen, even though for width and height I follow exactly the numbers given in dp at the website Device Metrics . Why is it cut off? And how can I avoid this? Is there an LC

Re: Stack Size Changes

2011-08-10 Thread Timothy Miller
A followup to my message on same thread, posted a few minutes ago, in reply to Paul. Further investigation reveals this anomaly: If I make the stack height a little too big, so the stack crops itself when it opens, and I then click on the little glowing green button at the upper left of the LC

Re: Stack Size Changes

2011-08-10 Thread Timothy Miller
f second group is >>> 200, bottom is 740. This group has a vertical scroll bar. >>> >>> "Resizable" for the stack is turned off. "Lock size and position" is on, >>> for both groups. >>> >>> I set the height of the stack

Re: Stack Size Changes

2011-08-10 Thread Paul Looney
here are no scripts that alter card size, group size or stack size. Repeat. Same thing. The change of height is inconsistent, even if I do nothing to the stack except open, change the height, and close. When the stack size gets smaller, I can't scroll to the bottom of the lower group, and the

Re: Stack Size Changes

2011-08-10 Thread Peter M. Brigham, MD
FYI, on a mac, the the working screenrect gives you the screenrect minus the height of the mac menubar (22). Does this work for you? on preopenstack set the width of this stack to 612 set the height of this stack to 792 set the top of this stack to 110 -- or whatever end preopenstack When

Stack Size Changes

2011-08-10 Thread Timothy Miller
Hi Malte and Bob, The windowBoundingRect is unfamiliar to me. This is probably the gap in my understanding I wanted to fill. I'm reading the dictionary, scratching my head. However, the arithmetic is not quite adding up. Visually, my stack fits on the screen. If I position it carefully by dragg

Re: Stack Size Changes

2011-08-10 Thread Bob Sneidar
for >> both groups. >> >> I set the height of the stack to 742. Save. Close the stack. Open it. The >> height is now less than 742. Sometimes it's 712. Sometimes it's 692, or 696, >> or possibly other values. >> >> There are no scripts that a

Re: Stack Size Changes

2011-08-10 Thread Malte Brill
Hi Tim, If the stack is taller (or wider) than governed by the windowBoundingRect, it will be automatically chopped off. I do not like it... Been that way for ever. :-( Cheers, Malte ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please

Re: Stack Size Changes

2011-08-10 Thread Timothy Miller
etimes it's 692, or 696, > or possibly other values. > > There are no scripts that alter card size, group size or stack size. > > Repeat. Same thing. The change of height is inconsistent, even if I do > nothing to the stack except open, change the height, and close. >

Stack Size Changes

2011-08-10 Thread Timothy Miller
ion" is on, for both groups. I set the height of the stack to 742. Save. Close the stack. Open it. The height is now less than 742. Sometimes it's 712. Sometimes it's 692, or 696, or possibly other values. There are no scripts that alter card size, group size or stack size. Rep

Re: Stack size

2010-11-24 Thread Ben Rubinstein
On 23/11/2010 22:55, FlexibleLearning wrote: We were getting a 'cannot find stack' error which actually meant 'cannot fully load this stack', as well as no graceful result that memory is running low; just a suddenly non-responsive stack. I think a bit of work is needed at the upper end of memory

Re: Stack size

2010-11-24 Thread FlexibleLearning
FlexibleLearning wrote: > Thank you Jacque... Forgot about that one. Had half-remembered it as a > compatibility-only function, but we'll give it a try. We were getting a > 'cannot find stack' error which actually meant 'cannot fully load this > stack', as well as no graceful result that memory is

Re: Stack size

2010-11-23 Thread Richard Gaskin
FlexibleLearning wrote: Thank you Jacque... Forgot about that one. Had half-remembered it as a compatibility-only function, but we'll give it a try. We were getting a 'cannot find stack' error which actually meant 'cannot fully load this stack', as well as no graceful result that memory is runni

Re: Stack size

2010-11-23 Thread FlexibleLearning
Thank you Jacque... Forgot about that one. Had half-remembered it as a compatibility-only function, but we'll give it a try. We were getting a 'cannot find stack' error which actually meant 'cannot fully load this stack', as well as no graceful result that memory is running low; just a suddenly non

Re: Stack size

2010-11-23 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 11/23/10 3:04 AM, FlexibleLearning wrote: As data is added to a particular stack, LiveCode runs the risk of running out of memory. Has anyone figured out how to check this programmatically, or is it a question for Edinburgh? I'm not sure you can do it exactly. You could check the size of the

Stack size

2010-11-23 Thread FlexibleLearning
As data is added to a particular stack, LiveCode runs the risk of running out of memory. Has anyone figured out how to check this programmatically, or is it a question for Edinburgh? Hugh Senior FLCo ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.run