Re: Sockets (again)

code anything over sockets. And yes I do append a numtochar(13) > coming and going and strip it off before decoding and read until > numToChar(13). I don't use cr because I am uncertain how each OS platform > treats it. The Server Agent could be running on anything in the future. >

Re: Sockets (again)

On 4/5/23 08:13, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote: Thanks Phil. Yes I learned the hard way with my SQL Agent to base64encode anything over sockets. And yes I do append a numtochar(13) coming and going and strip it off before decoding and read until numToChar(13). I don't use cr because

Re: Sockets (again)

Thanks Phil. Yes I learned the hard way with my SQL Agent to base64encode anything over sockets. And yes I do append a numtochar(13) coming and going and strip it off before decoding and read until numToChar(13). I don't use cr because I am uncertain how each OS platform treats it. The S

Re: Sockets (again)

, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote: I have sockets working in my File Server Agent, but only using non-blocking calls, that is using "with message". Removing the "with message" bit does not return any response from the server agent. For instance I send a payload using w

Sockets (again)

I have sockets working in my File Server Agent, but only using non-blocking calls, that is using "with message". Removing the "with message" bit does not return any response from the server agent. For instance I send a payload using write payload to socket

Re: Encrypted Data over Sockets

On 7/8/22 19:47, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote: Okay apparently base64Encode/Decode is my friend. I have this working now without encryption. I will re-enable encryption and see if that works. Base64 encoding will do the trick but at the expense of making your data strings twice as long

Re: Encrypted Data over Sockets

Hi all. Thanks for putting up with me. I finally got it all to work using base64Encode/Decode on the encrypted string before sending it with a delimiter appended. Same thing coming back. Thank for all your patience. I almost became a patient myself. Bob S > On Jul 8, 2022, at 19:14 , Bob

Re: Encrypted Data over Sockets

Okay apparently base64Encode/Decode is my friend. I have this working now without encryption. I will re-enable encryption and see if that works. Bob S > On Jul 8, 2022, at 19:14 , Bob Sneidar via use-livecode > wrote: > > It looks after the agent receives it generally like how it looked aft

Re: Encrypted Data over Sockets

It looks after the agent receives it generally like how it looked after I encoded the array but before I sent it. Obviously it's not the same. Something is corrupting it over the wire. I am not even using encryption now, just sending the encoded array data and a delimiter. When it decodes on the

Re: Encrypted Data over Sockets

On 7/8/22 17:47, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode wrote: But, an encoded array is STILL binary data. So any issues with "read until linefeed" will still exist. Try sending a header with number of bytes, followed by the bytes. Yeah. What he said. -- Mark Wieder ahsoftw...@gmail.com __

Re: Encrypted Data over Sockets

On 7/8/22 16:49, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote: Well I disabled encryption alltogether, sending and receiving an encoded array instead. Upon trying to decode I still get an error, and looking at what I get back, it LOOKS like an encoded array. They is just something wrong with the data. C

Re: Encrypted Data over Sockets

But, an encoded array is STILL binary data. So any issues with "read until linefeed" will still exist. Try sending a header with number of bytes, followed by the bytes. If you really wanted, you could do:    write  (the number of bytes in tSocketData) & linefeed to socket tSocket    write tSoc

Re: Encrypted Data over Sockets

Well I disabled encryption alltogether, sending and receiving an encoded array instead. Upon trying to decode I still get an error, and looking at what I get back, it LOOKS like an encoded array. They is just something wrong with the data. Curiously, if I just send and receive plain text it work

Re: Encrypted Data over Sockets

On 7/8/22 16:14, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote: My suspicion is that the hash contains a linefeed (sometimes). So the question I have is, what character is GUARANTEED to NOT be in an aes256 hash? Not a valid question. If you really need to send binary data over a socket connection, star

Encrypted Data over Sockets

Hi all. I'm running into a curious thing. I am sending encrypted data over a socket connection. When I send the data, I am using blocking mode, where the commands look like this: if tCurrentConnectionA ["ssl"] is true then put slyEncrypt(tSocketData) into tSocketData

Sample Stacks Using RSA + AES Encryption with sockets

code. I am using pretty verbose code here which you can of course mod to your own style--hopefully I've made it easy for those new to LC or sockets in general to understand and incorporate some of these ideas. The use of a long term RSA secret means there is no mechanism here for PFS: Pe

RE: Sockets (again)

m: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf Of Bob Sneidar via use-livecode Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 5:42 PM To: How to use LiveCode Cc: Bob Sneidar Subject: Sockets (again) Hi all. I’m trying to get sockets working. The host is working, but I am not getting

Re: Sockets (again)

I have a pair at http://dochawkbk.com/lcImages/ of master and slave stacks to talk to one another. They're meant to be compiled. They're probably 5.x stacks . . . I haven’t looked at them for a while. ___ use-livecode

Sockets (again)

Hi all. I’m trying to get sockets working. The host is working, but I am not getting the message to trigger. Here’s the basic code: on mouseUp put "test" into tPayLoad open socket to "localhost:8085" write tPayload to socket "localhost:8085" end

Re: read larger data streams over sockets - broken?

nyway) our team loves it: super simple, never fails, we never lose data, ever. I use shell commands for everything. not sure why you need sockets if you are just copy files around…from our Macs to the Synology server in the next room… Right, a NAS device can work very well as it obviously does in

Re: read larger data streams over sockets - broken?

via use-livecode > wrote: > > Is anyone else having problems with moving multi-MB data streams across > sockets in LC 8? > > I support a LAN-based system that relies on sockets to move data between > server and clients. The server's response to a single client req

Re: read larger data streams over sockets - broken?

ever. I use shell commands for everything. not sure why you need sockets if you are just copy files around…from our Macs to the Synology server in the next room… my long stack script just manages different put format "mv \"someFile\", \"newFileName\" # into cmdRename

read larger data streams over sockets - broken?

Is anyone else having problems with moving multi-MB data streams across sockets in LC 8? I support a LAN-based system that relies on sockets to move data between server and clients. The server's response to a single client request will often consist of several hundred KB to several MB of

Re: asynchronous sockets

s >>> using. >>> >> Ah, yes his is a use case that had lots of requests running in parallel >> and from the looks of things to the same API which libURL doesn’t cope with >> (would need a redesign to have request IDs rather than using the URL as the >> ID).

Re: asynchronous sockets

something libURL doesn’t do. So the sockets are fine it’s just libURL implementation that would need some help to meet Todd’s requirements. In Todd's application there was a requirement for asynchronous HTTP POST requests which aren't supported in libURL. Without tsNet, POST request

Re: asynchronous sockets

ts of requests running in parallel and from the looks of things to the same API which libURL doesn’t cope with (would need a redesign to have request IDs rather than using the URL as the ID). I’m not sure if he needed asynchronous put, post or delete but that’s also something libURL doesn’t do. So the s

Re: asynchronous sockets

ahhh I got my sockets vs http requests confusled too On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 12:22 AM, Tom Glod wrote: > I'm relieved to hear that I think I misunderstood Todd's blog... maybe > his was a purely volume related bottleneck and not the library he was using. > > Than

Re: asynchronous sockets

> > application. > > > > I'm aware of the built in internet library and the tsNet library > available > > to non-open source license owners. > > > > My question is "What isn't asyncronious about reading from and writing to > > sockets?” &g

Re: asynchronous sockets

icense owners. > > My question is "What isn't asyncronious about reading from and writing to > sockets?” Nothing really as long as you use the callback (with message) form then all the reading and writing is done on a separate thread. Of course your callback handler is handled o

asynchronous sockets

Hi everyone, I'm an open-source user and I am building socket communications for my application. I'm aware of the built in internet library and the tsNet library available to non-open source license owners. My question is "What isn't asyncronious about reading from and writ

Slow Sockets on Mac

I'm transferring 40mb over sockets a chunk at a time. The receiver is on a Win 10 Pro Hyper-V Host using LC 8.2.1. The sender uses LC 8.2.1 also. Sender on a Win10 Host==> 10 seconds Sender on a Win10 Pro VM==> 10 seconds Sender on a Win10 Home VM==> 10 seconds Sender on a 64 bit

Re: Secure sockets problem... any update?

If the issue is SSL 4.0 vs 3.0 or TLS 1.2 vs. 1.0, it all goes back to the heartbleed exploit and the countermeasures for that. Bob S > On Aug 8, 2016, at 11:56 , Richard Gaskin wrote: > > Stephen MacLean wrote: > > > Hi Richard, > > > > Thanks for adding yourself to the CC list on this bug

Re: Secure sockets problem... any update?

Stephen MacLean wrote: > Hi Richard, > > Thanks for adding yourself to the CC list on this bug:) It's an important bug, very much looking forward to following its progress. Thank you for providing a link to it here. > I think you may be reading the post from Panos with the wrong date > thou

Re: Secure sockets problem... any update?

, I was wondering if there > > was any update to the secure sockets problem I reported here: > > > > http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=16871 and > > When status changes occur in a report the submitter and any subscribers to > the report should receive notific

Re: Secure sockets problem... any update?

Stephen MacLean wrote: > With all that went on in the LC conference, I was wondering if there > was any update to the secure sockets problem I reported here: > > http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=16871 and When status changes occur in a report the submitter and any subscri

Secure sockets problem... any update?

Hi All, With all that went on in the LC conference, I was wondering if there was any update to the secure sockets problem I reported here: http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=16871 and http://forums.livecode.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=26225 <http://forums.livecode.com/viewtopic.p

Re: [TRYING AGAIN] Secure Sockets Issue

" >> >> Should create a secure connection between the two apps. >> >> > somewhere in the archives you will find a master/slave pair I wrote--and a > post by someone that fixed them :) > > > > -- > Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq. > (702) 508-8462 So

Re: **SPAM** [TRYING AGAIN] Secure Sockets Issue

> On Feb 2, 2016, at 11:40 AM, Stephen MacLean wrote: > > Hi All, > > Going to give this another go: > > I can not get two LC apps to connect and transmit to each other via secure > sockets. They connect fine and transmit fine without trying to secure them. > &g

Re: [TRYING AGAIN] Secure Sockets Issue

One of the links in my post was a link to one of yours. Didn’t see a fix there, but will keep looking. Best, Steve MacLean > On Feb 2, 2016, at 11:45 AM, Dr. Hawkins wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Stephen MacLean > wrote: > >> And this on the client: >> >> open secure socket to

Re: [TRYING AGAIN] Secure Sockets Issue

On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Stephen MacLean wrote: > And this on the client: > > open secure socket to (field "host" & ":5210") with message > “chatConnected" > > Should create a secure connection between the two apps. > > somewhere in the archives you will find a master/slave pair I wrote--

[TRYING AGAIN] Secure Sockets Issue

Hi All, Going to give this another go: I can not get two LC apps to connect and transmit to each other via secure sockets. They connect fine and transmit fine without trying to secure them. As far as I can tell, doing this on the server: accept secure connections on port 5210 with message

Re: Accepting secure connections with sockets

ting secured on both sides, but don’t know which one is causing the error. Hopefully someone from the mothership can comment on this as I’m at a loss at the moment. Best, Steve > On Jan 5, 2016, at 3:38 PM, Stephen MacLean wrote: > > Hi All, > > Some questions on securing s

Accepting secure connections with sockets

Hi All, Some questions on securing sockets both “server" and “client" side. On the server side (which is just an LC app, not a LC server deployment), you open a connection with “accept connections on port ”. I am trying to make sure that only secured connections are made to

Re: Sockets

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Eric Corbett wrote: > Thanks Dr. Hawkins, I’ll look that up. Does your code have both computers > doing an “accept connection on port …”? And is the port different on each > computer or the same? Maybe I’ll have my answer from a code audit. > Master accepts the c

Re: Sockets

Thanks Bob, but it doesn’t quite help. I can use sockets, just not sure how to talk back and forth without having both devices acting like a server. Thanks Dr. Hawkins, I’ll look that up. Does your code have both computers doing an “accept connection on port …”? And is the port different on

Re: Sockets

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Eric Corbett wrote: > Bonus: How do I use the "|[connection id]”? I use an id for open socket > and write to, but the address from the readSocket callback does not contain > an ID. Is this a bug? I use write to… with message… and this handler has > the ID as part

Re: Sockets

n the data read up until that point. I got all that just reading the dictionary, so I hope I got all that right. Bob S > On Oct 16, 2015, at 13:44 , Eric Corbett wrote: > > I’ve read all the documentation and posts I can find and something still > confuses me about sockets… >

Sockets

I’ve read all the documentation and posts I can find and something still confuses me about sockets… Server computer accept connections on port 12345 with message “readSocket” Client opens socket IP:12345 Client writes to socket IP:12345 Server reads message from client: on readSocket

Re: Speaking of sockets...

Unplug your network connection and try again. The problem occurs when I cannot connect to the database because of firewall issues at a customer location. Then it takes a full minute at least to timeout before I get control of LC again. But no matter because the open socket method I posted fixes

Re: Speaking of sockets...

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Bob Sneidar wrote: > Oh good to know. However, I am getting less than a second response time > for open socket, and I wouldn’t want to set a timeout that low for SQL. > > I'm currently seeing ~250 ms to connect to mySQL on dreamhost . . . -- Dr. Richard E. Hawk

Re: Speaking of sockets...

Oh good to know. However, I am getting less than a second response time for open socket, and I wouldn’t want to set a timeout that low for SQL. Bob S > On Jan 20, 2015, at 19:04 , Dr. Hawkins wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Bob Sneidar > wrote: > >> I’ve mentioned in the past t

Re: Speaking of sockets...

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote: > I’ve mentioned in the past that if I am unable to connect to a mySQL > server (such as going to a location with my laptop and finding their > firewall blocks port 3306) it takes close to a minute for LC to release and > tell me it cannot conne

Speaking of sockets...

I’ve mentioned in the past that if I am unable to connect to a mySQL server (such as going to a location with my laptop and finding their firewall blocks port 3306) it takes close to a minute for LC to release and tell me it cannot connect. During that time LC is completely unresponsive. I neede

postgres ssl authentication? sockets?

ot; ? I have "ssl = on" in postgres.conf, but I didn't set the certificates, etc. However, from the postgres docs, it seems that those will want another key from the client, and there's no way to specify this for livecode. I'm wondering if sockets might be a better ap

Re: Sockets

Bug reported: 14287 - e On Dec 22, 2014, at 10:32 PM, Peter W A Wood wrote: > When opening when starting a socket, I see the problem. This is the port > number that was displayed "12345ر” > > Regards > > Peter > >> On 23 Dec 2014, at 11:54, Eric Corbett wrote: >> >> Thanks Peter, >> >>

Re: Sockets

When opening when starting a socket, I see the problem. This is the port number that was displayed "12345ر” Regards Peter > On 23 Dec 2014, at 11:54, Eric Corbett wrote: > > Thanks Peter, > > Try starting a server by doing > > accept connections on port 12345 with message "xxx" > > Then

Re: Sockets

Thanks all, I'll send in a bug report. e > On Dec 22, 2014, at 20:22, Paul Hibbert wrote: > > Eric, > > I see the same problem too on LC 7.0.1 (Build 1023) under Yosemite, works > fine in LC 6.7.1 & LC 6.6.5 as far as I can tell. > > Paul > >> On Dec 22, 2014, at 8:02 PM, Mike Bonner wro

Re: Sockets

Eric, I see the same problem too on LC 7.0.1 (Build 1023) under Yosemite, works fine in LC 6.7.1 & LC 6.6.5 as far as I can tell. Paul > On Dec 22, 2014, at 8:02 PM, Mike Bonner wrote: > > Yep, i'm seeing this on 7.0.0 too. The other versions I have (various 6xxx > versions) work correction,

Re: Sockets

Yep, i'm seeing this on 7.0.0 too. The other versions I have (various 6xxx versions) work correction, though I haven't tried the most recent 6 stable. If I can get 7.0.1 to install I'll try it there also. On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Peter W A Wood wrote: > > Hello Eric > > I ran a very simpl

Re: Sockets

Thanks Peter, Try starting a server by doing accept connections on port 12345 with message "xxx" Then list the openSockets. The open port 12345 will or might have an extra character at the end. - Eric > On Dec 22, 2014, at 17:35, Peter W A Wood wrote: > > Hello Eric > > I ran a very si

Re: Sockets

Hello Eric I ran a very simple test using LiveCode 7.0.1 on OS X Yosemite and didn’t see the issue. It was a very simple test though. My test had three buttons: open, list, close and one field: Report. The three button scripts were: open - open socket to "127.0.0.1:80"

Sockets

Hello all, I’m using LiveCode 7.0.1. I have a port open and when I get the openSockets list, the port has an extra character on the end like an ‘å’ or a double quote. I check to see if the port is in the openSocket list so I don’t try to accept connections again, but if I have wholeMatches set

Re: Secure Sockets

So can I safely assume that no one ever has tried to use secure sockets in LC? On 15 Oct 2014, at 18:59, Björnke von Gierke wrote: > Hi all > > I'm rather uneducated with encryption stuff, so I wanted to try out secure > sockets. However, most likely due to my incapability t

Secure Sockets

Hi all I'm rather uneducated with encryption stuff, so I wanted to try out secure sockets. However, most likely due to my incapability to understand what I'm doing, I've been unable to get a simple example working. I've used my own "simplest socket client/server&quo

Re: Using sockets

rth wrote: > > > The dictionary adds to the confusion when, in the write to socket entry, > it > > says the socket id is an ip address followed by a port when it's actually > > followed by a socket. > > I agree that there's some small inconsistencies in naming sockets

Re: Using sockets

On 15.01.2014, at 01:14, Peter Haworth wrote: > The dictionary adds to the confusion when, in the write to socket entry, it > says the socket id is an ip address followed by a port when it's actually > followed by a socket. I agree that there's some small inconsistencies i

Re: Using sockets

with messages doesn't block > > > John. > > > > > On 14/01/2014 17:22, Peter Haworth wrote: > >> Diving into yet another new are of Livecode for me - sockets. >> >> My server issues an accept statement for port 10100. My client opens >> socket

Re: Using sockets

the data. read from socket with messages doesn't block John. On 14/01/2014 17:22, Peter Haworth wrote: Diving into yet another new are of Livecode for me - sockets. My server issues an accept statement for port 10100. My client opens socket 10100. WHen the client connects to the server

Re: Using sockets

erent sockets. If the client connects to a server and the new socket opened on the server side is 127.0.0.1:10100|567657 but you read from socket 127.0.0.1:10100 with a callback message, a message will never be received on that socket and eventually the socketTimeout message will be triggered.

Using sockets

Diving into yet another new are of Livecode for me - sockets. My server issues an accept statement for port 10100. My client opens socket 10100. WHen the client connects to the server, the port number I get is not 10100, but some other number which changes on each connection. When sending

Re: Sockets on mobile…at last!

On Jul 13, 2013, at 2:53 PM, Monte Goulding wrote: > > On 14/07/2013, at 1:57 AM, Mark Talluto wrote: > >> What problems are you correcting regarding sockets for desktops? > > None, I was talking about getting the sockets implementation in the engine to > work on iOS

Re: Sockets on mobile…at last!

On 14/07/2013, at 1:57 AM, Mark Talluto wrote: > What problems are you correcting regarding sockets for desktops? None, I was talking about getting the sockets implementation in the engine to work on iOS and android. -- Monte Goulding M E R Goulding - software development services merg

Re: Sockets on mobile…at last!

gt;> There were posts about it... perhaps not mentioning mergSocket >> specifically... just mobile socket external. The Kickstarter campaign came >> along so I went quite about my little project so I didn't distract anyone. >> From here forward the simplest thing is to fi

Re: Sockets on mobile…at last!

people didn't hear about it. > > There were posts about it... perhaps not mentioning mergSocket > specifically... just mobile socket external. The Kickstarter campaign came > along so I went quite about my little project so I didn't distract anyone. > From here forward the sim

Re: Sockets on mobile…at last!

er campaign came along so I went quite about my little project so I didn't distract anyone. From here forward the simplest thing is to fix sockets in the engine. It's not a huge job which I've done some of but at the moment I'm lacking two things to get the job completed:

Re: Sockets on mobile…at last!

I searched for mergSocket on the list and found only the recent mentions. Maybe people didn't hear about it. And good work! Dar On Jul 12, 2013, at 6:45 PM, Monte Goulding wrote: > > On 13/07/2013, at 10:19 AM, Roger Eller wrote: > >> So the Android version will be next, right? > > Unfor

Re: Sockets on mobile…at last!

On 13/07/2013, at 10:56 AM, Roger Eller wrote: > It sounds more like mob-funding. We all know it only takes 3 to make a > crowd. :-P Well that ship sailed last year and didn't float... I see no reason why it would float now. -- Monte Goulding M E R Goulding - software development services

Re: Sockets on mobile…at last!

It sounds more like mob-funding. We all know it only takes 3 to make a crowd. :-P On Jul 12, 2013 8:45 PM, "Monte Goulding" wrote: > > On 13/07/2013, at 10:19 AM, Roger Eller > wrote: > > > So the Android version will be next, right? > > Unfortunately not, if you remember mergSocket was crowd

Re: Sockets on mobile…at last!

On 13/07/2013, at 10:19 AM, Roger Eller wrote: > So the Android version will be next, right? Unfortunately not, if you remember mergSocket was crowd funded except we didn't make the funding target so in agreement with the funders (there were 5) I produced an iOS only external. On the up side

Re: Sockets on mobile…at last!

on iPads. Our iPads can now > communicate directly with our desktops. It is truly amazing to see it all > working so well. > > > > If you are looking for sockets on iOS, Monte has what you need. Long > live these and other amazing 3rd party efforts to improve our programming >

Re: Sockets on mobile…at last!

o > well. > > If you are looking for sockets on iOS, Monte has what you need. Long live > these and other amazing 3rd party efforts to improve our programming lives. Thanks Mark, I'm glad it's doing the job for you. Cheers -- Monte Goulding M E R Goulding - software develop

Sockets on mobile…at last!

Monte, I just want to thank you for completing this external. We have been using it every day for the last few days on iPads. Our iPads can now communicate directly with our desktops. It is truly amazing to see it all working so well. If you are looking for sockets on iOS, Monte has what

Re: Mobile sockets crowd funding opportunity

On Dec 13, 2012, at 1:52 PM, Monte Goulding wrote: > I expect the external won't care about the hardware as long as there's an ip > network. > > On 14/12/2012, at 8:42 AM, Mark Talluto wrote: > >> I am not sure about bluetooth and the sockets external under de

Re: Mobile sockets crowd funding opportunity

I expect the external won't care about the hardware as long as there's an ip network. On 14/12/2012, at 8:42 AM, Mark Talluto wrote: > I am not sure about bluetooth and the sockets external under development. > Monte will have to chime in on that. I am expecting to be ab

Re: Mobile sockets crowd funding opportunity

All I can say is if you know where to look after an iOS sdk external is compiled you will see that some work has been done to implement android externals and java interface etc. So... it's still in the hopefully soon bot don't hold your breath category. On 14/12/2012, at 8:23 AM, Andrew Kluthe

Re: Mobile sockets crowd funding opportunity

e one less issue to worry about. > > I'll have to wait and see… > > Thanks! I am not sure about bluetooth and the sockets external under development. Monte will have to chime in on that. I am expecting to be able to access the wifi and ethernet for

Re: Mobile sockets crowd funding opportunity

> Sorry to interject, but is there any kind of vague time frame for > android externals that runrev has talked about? There's already been enough vagueness on this. Android SDK here yesterday ... pretty please! -- Nicolas Cueto ___ use-livecode mailin

Re: Mobile sockets crowd funding opportunity

android implementation of livecode. Sockets, advanced mapping/geospatial stuff is all being thought about when it comes to what is possible for us to make apps that leverage these features. On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Monte Goulding wrote: > in the future after there's an android exter

Re: Mobile sockets crowd funding opportunity

Unfortunately this is where you need the sockets external because right now you can't accept connections (like a server). So at the moment it's just for finding desktop apps. On 14/12/2012, at 7:31 AM, JOHN PATTEN wrote: > Thanks Monte… > > I'm not familiar with Bo

Re: Mobile sockets crowd funding opportunity

Thanks Monte… I'm not familiar with Bonjour other than for the usual finding printers and OS stuff. I hadn't thought of using Bonjour to allow IOS devices to discover other iOS devices. This seems like a good direction to experiment in. Any example stacks floating around that demonstrate a sim

Re: Mobile sockets crowd funding opportunity

On 14/12/2012, at 7:05 AM, JOHN PATTEN wrote: > Hi Mark… > > Hmmm? So it would appear if we wanted to make the ability for devices to > discover each other, say via bluetooth, and we may use Android devices, we'd > be best going after the socket external as opposed to the Game Center > exter

Re: Mobile sockets crowd funding opportunity

Talluto wrote: > On Dec 13, 2012, at 9:27 AM, JOHN PATTEN wrote: > >> The sockets project sparked an idea and a question… >> >> Is is possible to create a LiveCode mobile app that while running, in >> foreground or background, can sense via bluetooth when a simil

Re: Mobile sockets crowd funding opportunity

On Dec 13, 2012, at 9:27 AM, JOHN PATTEN wrote: > The sockets project sparked an idea and a question… > > Is is possible to create a LiveCode mobile app that while running, in > foreground or background, can sense via bluetooth when a similar app is > running on another iOS d

Re: Mobile sockets crowd funding opportunity

ding by the way because w want to implement some matchmaking and play functions. Cheers -- M E R Goulding Software development services mergExt - There's an external for that! On 14/12/2012, at 4:27 AM, JOHN PATTEN wrote: > The sockets project sparked an idea and a question… > &g

Re: Mobile sockets crowd funding opportunity

The sockets project sparked an idea and a question… Is is possible to create a LiveCode mobile app that while running, in foreground or background, can sense via bluetooth when a similar app is running on another iOS device? I'm thinking in terms of a game like environment, where iOS m

Re: Mobile sockets crowd funding opportunity

M, Monte Goulding >> wrote: >> >>> Hi LiveCoders >>> >>> A number of LiveCode developers need sockets on iOS and android. The >>> subject of developing an external for this feature came up recently on the >>> LiveCode Developer Program list. It

Re: Mobile sockets crowd funding opportunity

gt; On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Monte Goulding > wrote: > >> Hi LiveCoders >> >> A number of LiveCode developers need sockets on iOS and android. The >> subject of developing an external for this feature came up recently on the >> LiveCode Developer Program li

Re: Mobile sockets crowd funding opportunity

Just in case anybody over here was leery of being an early in, we're in. On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Monte Goulding wrote: > Hi LiveCoders > > A number of LiveCode developers need sockets on iOS and android. The > subject of developing an external for this feature came u

Mobile sockets crowd funding opportunity

Hi LiveCoders A number of LiveCode developers need sockets on iOS and android. The subject of developing an external for this feature came up recently on the LiveCode Developer Program list. It was proposed by a number of developers that the external would be a good candidate for crowd funding

Re: Sockets or similar on IOS and Android

On 06/12/2012, at 2:15 AM, Rod McCall wrote: > We basically need to be able to support secure data connections to/from a > server. Based on discussions from a long time ago and also on looking at > the LiveCode dictionary (at least in 5.5.1) there is no support for sockets. If you

  1   2   >