Re: Second set of eyes needed.

2012-01-09 Thread Mark Wieder
Mike- Monday, January 9, 2012, 2:28:24 PM, you wrote: > put ((yy - 1) * W * 4 ) + ((xx - 1) * 4) into myindex ...and if I'm not wrong about this, that would be put (((yy - 1) * W) + xx - 1)* 4 into myindex -- -Mark Wieder mwie...@ahsoftware.net __

Re: Second set of eyes needed.

2012-01-09 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 1/9/12 5:27 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote: Many on the list will be very thankful indeed to know just how many times I had to close an email without saving because in the process of compiling all my information I discovered what I had done wrong. :-) The same thing happens with bug reports. Believe

Re: Second set of eyes needed.

2012-01-09 Thread Bob Sneidar
Many on the list will be very thankful indeed to know just how many times I had to close an email without saving because in the process of compiling all my information I discovered what I had done wrong. :-) Bob On Jan 9, 2012, at 2:52 PM, stephen barncard wrote: > Just kidding - my point is

Re: Second set of eyes needed.

2012-01-09 Thread stephen barncard
Just kidding - my point is, and this happens to me all the time, by the time I get the problem defined and stated on the list, the thought processes involved in explaining it usually enable the solution by myself. On 9 January 2012 14:50, stephen barncard wrote: > we're always glad to help. > > >

Re: Second set of eyes needed.

2012-01-09 Thread stephen barncard
we're always glad to help. On 9 January 2012 14:28, Michael Doub wrote: > After taking a break for a while and coming back I found it. > > put ((yy - 1) * W ) + ((xx - 1) * 4) into myindex needs to be > > put ((yy - 1) * W * 4 ) + ((xx - 1) * 4) into myindex > > > > Stephen Barncard San Franc

Re: Second set of eyes needed.

2012-01-09 Thread Michael Doub
After taking a break for a while and coming back I found it. put ((yy - 1) * W ) + ((xx - 1) * 4) into myindex needs to be put ((yy - 1) * W * 4 ) + ((xx - 1) * 4) into myindex On 2012-01-09, at 4:54 PM, Michael Doub wrote: > getitback needs to be passed W not L (width not the length) but

Re: Second set of eyes needed.

2012-01-09 Thread Michael Doub
getitback needs to be passed W not L (width not the length) but the problem still exists. On 2012-01-09, at 4:33 PM, Michael Doub wrote: > I have been trying to figure out why I have not been able to retrieve valid > RGB values from an image. > I decided to generate my own image so I would be

Second set of eyes needed.

2012-01-09 Thread Michael Doub
I have been trying to figure out why I have not been able to retrieve valid RGB values from an image. I decided to generate my own image so I would be able to track down my issue. I thought that would be straight forward, Several hrs later and i am still at an impasse. I am trying to und