Thanks, Richard. That lets me anticipate the new changes. I'm also modifying
images and I'l convert that code to use byteToNum.
Bill
William Prothero
http://es.earthednet.org
On Mar 13, 2014, at 9:44 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
> prothero wrote:
>
> > Mainly, what I was wondering is if the byt
prothero wrote:
> Mainly, what I was wondering is if the byteToNum command is the
> correct one. In images, its the convert character to number, but
> I thought the character commands for binary data were going to
> be deprecated.
Yes, for comparing a single-byte value, byteToNum is the better c
Folks:
Mainly, what I was wondering is if the byteToNum command is the correct one. In
images, its the convert character to number, but I thought the character
commands for binary data were going to be deprecated.
Thanks,
Bill
William Prothero
http://es.earthednet.org
On Mar 12, 2014, at 4:55
Folks:
Before I bang my head against the wall too much, I'd like to make sure I'm
approaching this task correctly.
I have a digital elevation file consisting of 16 bit 2's complement data. I
first determine the position of the data for the desired location, then I do a
binary read.
put getAF
