Re: revOpenDatabase acting differently in IDE and standalone

2013-05-02 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 5/2/13 8:19 PM, Peter Haworth wrote: I guess I'm a little surprised by that. There was a thread in November last year about this and some pretty enlightened experts on this list indicated that the format of a standalone had changed within the last year and it was no longer possible (OK, it's

Re: revOpenDatabase acting differently in IDE and standalone

2013-05-02 Thread Peter Haworth
I guess I'm a little surprised by that. There was a thread in November last year about this and some pretty enlightened experts on this list indicated that the format of a standalone had changed within the last year and it was no longer possible (OK, it's always possible!) to get at the scripts wi

Re: revOpenDatabase acting differently in IDE and standalone

2013-05-02 Thread Björnke von Gierke
yes, i missed that change. but my other comments still stand :) On 02.05.2013, at 21:56, stephen barncard wrote: > I think Mark Wieder stated that script limits are gone now. > > > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Björnke von Gierke wrote: > >> >> On 02.05.2013, at 00:05, Peter Haworth wrote:

Re: revOpenDatabase acting differently in IDE and standalone

2013-05-02 Thread stephen barncard
I think Mark Wieder stated that script limits are gone now. On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Björnke von Gierke wrote: > > On 02.05.2013, at 00:05, Peter Haworth wrote: > > > I don't think so - standalones are the same as any other executables, > they > > have compiled code in them, not scripts.

Re: revOpenDatabase acting differently in IDE and standalone

2013-05-02 Thread Björnke von Gierke
On 02.05.2013, at 00:05, Peter Haworth wrote: > I don't think so - standalones are the same as any other executables, they > have compiled code in them, not scripts. Just want to note that this is wrong, and standalones do contain all unencrypted scripts as clear text. They also contain field c

Re: revOpenDatabase acting differently in IDE and standalone

2013-05-01 Thread Dr. Hawkins
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Mike Bonner wrote: > Another thought, (again 98% sure this isn't the issue but..) If the > standalone builder picks and chooses db support based on code it sees in > the stack, and if you are using a splash stack, or your db code is in a > substack/external stack,

Re: revOpenDatabase acting differently in IDE and standalone

2013-05-01 Thread Peter Haworth
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Mike Bonner wrote: > Also, if its a splashstack type with a separate stack file the separate > file could be opened in the ide. > Right, forgot about that Pete lcSQL Software ___ use-livecode mail

Re: revOpenDatabase acting differently in IDE and standalone

2013-05-01 Thread Peter Haworth
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote: > Yes, but if I send it out without the password protection, anyone could > open it with the IDE, couldn't they? > I don't think so - standalones are the same as any other executables, they have compiled code in them, not scripts. Anyway, best

Re: revOpenDatabase acting differently in IDE and standalone

2013-05-01 Thread Mike Bonner
Also, if its a splashstack type with a separate stack file the separate file could be opened in the ide. On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 4:00 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > On 5/1/13 4:02 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote: > >> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Peter Haworth wrote: >> >> Maybe I'm misunderstanding the

Re: revOpenDatabase acting differently in IDE and standalone

2013-05-01 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 5/1/13 4:02 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote: On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Peter Haworth wrote: Maybe I'm misunderstanding the requirement here, but aren't you sending this application out as a standalone? If so the issue of password protecting the scripts is moot since it only applies to running

Re: revOpenDatabase acting differently in IDE and standalone

2013-05-01 Thread Mark Wieder
Dr. Hawkins writes: > > On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: > > > Ah. In that case, LC 5.5.4 is your friend. > > But you knew that already. > > > > But this *is* 5.5.4 that can't open a postgres database from a standalone! > > It doesn't have a problem with sqlite, though, and

Re: revOpenDatabase acting differently in IDE and standalone

2013-05-01 Thread Mike Bonner
Another thought, (again 98% sure this isn't the issue but..) If the standalone builder picks and chooses db support based on code it sees in the stack, and if you are using a splash stack, or your db code is in a substack/external stack, is it possible that the standalone builder is just not inclu

Re: revOpenDatabase acting differently in IDE and standalone

2013-05-01 Thread Mike Bonner
Hmm, based on the error you posted i'm sure this isn't the issue, but.. you aren't trying to open the postgres database in preopenstack are you? If so, externals loading may not yet be complete. On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote: > On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Peter Haworth

Re: revOpenDatabase acting differently in IDE and standalone

2013-05-01 Thread Dr. Hawkins
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Peter Haworth wrote: > Maybe I'm misunderstanding the requirement here, but aren't you sending > this application out as a standalone? If so the issue of password > protecting the scripts is moot since it only applies to running stacks in > the IDE. > Yes, but if

Re: revOpenDatabase acting differently in IDE and standalone

2013-05-01 Thread Dr. Hawkins
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: > Ah. In that case, LC 5.5.4 is your friend. > But you knew that already. > But this *is* 5.5.4 that can't open a postgres database from a standalone! It doesn't have a problem with sqlite, though, and the IDE (both 6.x and 5.5.4) can open post

Re: revOpenDatabase acting differently in IDE and standalone

2013-05-01 Thread Peter Haworth
Dr Hawkins, Maybe I'm misunderstanding the requirement here, but aren't you sending this application out as a standalone? If so the issue of password protecting the scripts is moot since it only applies to running stacks in the IDE. Doesn't help with your revdatabaseopen problem though. Pete lcS

Re: revOpenDatabase acting differently in IDE and standalone

2013-05-01 Thread Mark Wieder
Richard- > That is *exactly* what I need to do Ah. In that case, LC 5.5.4 is your friend. But you knew that already. -- Mark Wieder mwie...@ahsoftware.net ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscr

Re: revOpenDatabase acting differently in IDE and standalone

2013-05-01 Thread Dr. Hawkins
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 9:46 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: > Well, as has been mentioned before, you don't need to encrypt them > until you're ready to push them out into the wild. That is *exactly* what I need to do, and what I was able to do when using sqlite instead of postcript. These are demo an

Re: revOpenDatabase acting differently in IDE and standalone

2013-04-30 Thread Mark Wieder
Richard- Tuesday, April 30, 2013, 9:35:12 PM, you wrote: > I'm *trying* to get commercial 6.0.1, but all I've found so far is community. > I *absolutely* need commercial, as I need the stacks encrypted. Well, as has been mentioned before, you don't need to encrypt them until you're ready to pus

Re: revOpenDatabase acting differently in IDE and standalone

2013-04-30 Thread Dr. Hawkins
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Mike Bonner wrote: > Sounds like something is up with the external for postgres standalone > building. You might look in the installation folder for LC 6+, find the > tools/runtime/windows/x86-32/externals folder, look at the file > externals.txt and see if it loo

Re: revOpenDatabase acting differently in IDE and standalone

2013-04-30 Thread Mike Bonner
Sounds like something is up with the external for postgres standalone building. You might look in the installation folder for LC 6+, find the tools/runtime/windows/x86-32/externals folder, look at the file externals.txt and see if it looks right, then also look in the database drivers folder and m