Your training is almost complete. Destroy Darth Vader and take his place at my
side! Mooo haah haah haha hahah ahah!
Bob
On Feb 9, 2012, at 12:24 PM, Klaus on-rev wrote:
> So with this text above in tText and "tag2" int tTag:
>
> function mk_getXMLdata tText, tTag
> get matchText(tText,
Hi friends,
thank you all for your help, i got it to work now!
Again thanks a lot!
Best
Klaus
--
Klaus Major
http://www.major-k.de
kl...@major.on-rev.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Klaus on-rev wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> Am 09.02.2012 um 22:05 schrieb Andre Garzia:
>
> > Klaus,
> >
> > Since you have control, then instead of RegEx, you can go like
> >
> >
> > nodecontent
> >
> >
> > All in different lines, then, you can just use lineOffset to f
>> Nonetheless, if you want to continue down the regex path, try
>> something like
>>
>> get matchText(tText,"(?s)<" & tTag & ">(.*?)",tValue)
>> replace "<" & tTag & ">" & tValue " with
>> "<" & tTag & ">" & tNewValue "
>> in tText
>
> well, I did not want to pass the text that I want to overwri
On 09/02/2012 21:00, Klaus on-rev wrote:
get matchText(tText,"(?s)<"& tTag& ">(.*?)",tValue)
replace "<"& tTag& ">"& tValue" with
"<"& tTag& ">"& tNewValue"
in tText
well, I did not want to pass the text that I want to overwrite in the XML,
which I do not now in that moment!
But thi
Hi Andre,
Am 09.02.2012 um 22:05 schrieb Andre Garzia:
> Klaus,
>
> Since you have control, then instead of RegEx, you can go like
>
>
> nodecontent
>
>
> All in different lines, then, you can just use lineOffset to find the start
> node and the end node and copy or replace the data between
Klaus,
Since you have control, then instead of RegEx, you can go like
nodecontent
All in different lines, then, you can just use lineOffset to find the start
node and the end node and copy or replace the data between those lines. It
is easier than RegEx.
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Klaus
Hi guys,
Am 09.02.2012 um 21:52 schrieb Mark Wieder:
> Klaus,
>
> What Andre said.
Sigh... :-)
> Nonetheless, if you want to continue down the regex path, try
> something like
>
> get matchText(tText,"(?s)<" & tTag & ">(.*?)",tValue)
> replace "<" & tTag & ">" & tValue " with
> "<" & tTag &
Hi Andre,
Am 09.02.2012 um 21:38 schrieb Andre Garzia:
> Klaus,
>
> I used to work like that, doing little XML files with RegEx and matchText.
> After working like that for a long time, I came to realize that there was
> no advantage at all in my case. It was simpler to work with RevXML. The
> p
Klaus,
What Andre said. Nonetheless, if you want to continue down the regex path, try
something like
get matchText(tText,"(?s)<" & tTag & ">(.*?)",tValue)
replace "<" & tTag & ">" & tValue " with
"<" & tTag & ">" & tNewValue "
in tText
--
Mark Wieder
_
On 09/02/2012 20:24, Klaus on-rev wrote:
in my current project I need to deal with VERY small XML files
with maybe up to 20 entries.
Wait, didn't we just hear that you can't parse html (or XML) with
regexps? *grin*
function mk_getXMLdata tText, tTag
get matchText(tText,"(?s)<"& tTag&
Klaus,
I used to work like that, doing little XML files with RegEx and matchText.
After working like that for a long time, I came to realize that there was
no advantage at all in my case. It was simpler to work with RevXML. The
problem with RegEx is all the little cases where it fails. I think you
12 matches
Mail list logo
