> On 10 Sep 2017, at 1:16 pm, Mark Wieder via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
>> FWIW I would dearly love send in time to remember the caller and if the
>> target is the caller then allow private handlers.
>
> That. Very that.
> Also private callbacks for socket messages.
Socket callbacks are basica
On 09/07/2017 03:06 PM, Monte Goulding via use-livecode wrote:
FWIW I would dearly love send in time to remember the caller and if the target
is the caller then allow private handlers.
That. Very that.
Also private callbacks for socket messages.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
> On Sep 8, 2017, at 08:04 , Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Looks like others have answered your question in my stead. :-) I will give
> you a good use case.
I will add this too. It would be great if a behavior had access to the local
script's constants as well. This is how I m
Looks like others have answered your question in my stead. :-) I will give you
a good use case.
I have a series of buttons on various cards/substacks that all do almost the
exact same thing: Query for data, populate the card, create delete edit data,
etc. This makes them prime candidates for b
> On 8 Sep 2017, at 8:49 am, Phil Davis via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Clearly the complexity you're painfully aware of is nicely hidden from me by
> LC script, where I tend to think all things are most likely possible. It's
> good for bubble-dwellers like myself to occasionally be pulled back
Clearly the complexity you're painfully aware of is nicely hidden from
me by LC script, where I tend to think all things are most likely
possible. It's good for bubble-dwellers like myself to occasionally be
pulled back into reality. I guess. ;-)
Thanks -
Phil
On 9/7/17 3:06 PM, Monte Gouldi
> On 8 Sep 2017, at 7:19 am, Phil Davis via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> You asked me a similar question on 11-Nov-2016 - here is the back-and-forth.
> Sometimes we have our reasons! :-)
Ha… OK back in my box then ;-)
FWIW I would dearly love send in time to remember the caller and if the targe
Make that 8-Nov-2016.
Phil
On 9/7/17 2:19 PM, Phil Davis wrote:
You asked me a similar question on 11-Nov-2016 - here is the
back-and-forth. Sometimes we have our reasons! :-)
--
Phil Davis
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.co
On 9/7/17 2:01 PM, Monte Goulding via use-livecode wrote:
On 8 Sep 2017, at 3:57 am, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
wrote:
Here's a surprise! You cannot dispatch to a private command or function, EVEN
THOUGH the private command or function is in the SAME SCRIPT!
Nor can you send in time… howe
> On 8 Sep 2017, at 3:57 am, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Here's a surprise! You cannot dispatch to a private command or function, EVEN
> THOUGH the private command or function is in the SAME SCRIPT!
Nor can you send in time… however why do you want to dispatch to the same
scrip
10 matches
Mail list logo
