Got errors popping up "no such button" -- the button was referred to as "bg btn
id 1" and it evidently referred to the popup button to choose the number of
iterations, and its ID in the properties inspector was 4982. I found several
other similar object references, then poked around a little mor
I'm out traveling so I don't have access to RevBench right now, but
I'm curious what you mean by "weird" - errors, unexpected results,
or something else?
--
Richard Gaskin
"Weird" = the results are now in CSV format! J/K. Howdy. :)
CK
___
use-live
Peter M. Brigham wrote:
> There is an old stack by Richard Gaskin, 4W_RevBench, that I have
> usually used for benchmarking but I just pulled it out and it is
> now acting very weird for me since I moved to LC 5.5...
I'm out traveling so I don't have access to RevBench right now, but I'm
curious
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Peter M. Brigham wrote:
> Running the comparison on my old MacBook Core 2 Duo within a high-n repeat
> loop I get
>
> script 1: 2.177881 seconds
> script 2: 1.962642 seconds
>
> so the intermediate shallow array saves some time, presumably increasingly
> more wit
On Jun 21, 2013, at 11:26 AM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:33 AM, Mark Wilcox wrote:
>> A good example from this thread is having four different versions of the
>> same function with
>> tiny variations at the beginning.
>
> For that matter . . . does anyone really know the tim
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:33 AM, Mark Wilcox wrote:
> A good example from this thread is having four different versions of the same
> function with
>tiny variations at the beginning.
For that matter . . . does anyone really know the timing comparisons
for LiveCode. Say, for parsing a constant "
Richmond wrote:
> Well that is rather the same as my being extremely mean when removing
> the core of a green pepper,
> cutting as near to the stem as possible, because at one time in my life
> I was really living on the edge,
> financially (when I was in the USA); while now I can both afoord
On 06/21/2013 02:04 AM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Richmond wrote:
Some of those habits are not necessarily a bad thing as not all of your
end-users are
going to have the "all-singing, all-dancing machine" you obviously have!
For what I'm doing, they're going to be r
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Richmond wrote:
> Some of those habits are not necessarily a bad thing as not all of your
> end-users are
> going to have the "all-singing, all-dancing machine" you obviously have!
For what I'm doing, they're going to be reasonably up to date.
But what's gettin
On 06/20/2013 10:22 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
OK, we're well into the 21st century.
I'm on a multi-core, multi-gigahertz machine.
Yet I keep trying to optimize away single lines of code, to the point
that I had four versions of some of my functions to avoid a little
switch at the start to set a wo
10 matches
Mail list logo
