On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Matthias Rebbe | M-R-D <
matthias_livecode_150...@m-r-d.de> wrote:
> Okay i could use milliseconds and divide them by 1, but that would be
> the same.
>
>
Or if you used the milliseconds MOD whatever, you would get far more bits
that actually changed . . . (tha
Hi,
thanks for clarifying. I forgot to mention that my function creates a
mobile-otp (mOTP).
So using only otp in the topic and in the text was misleading.
To create a mOTP i need to use the seconds and divide them by 10 in my
function, otherwise login will not work on devices which support mOT
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Matthias Rebbe | M-R-D <
matthias_livecode_150...@m-r-d.de> wrote:
> i don´t understand the meaning of your last sentence and google translate
> is also not helpful.
> Does it make a difference if using milliseconds and divide them by 1000
> and by 10?
>
Using the
Hi,
i don´t understand the meaning of your last sentence and google translate is
also not helpful.
Does it make a difference if using milliseconds and divide them by 1000 and by
10?
Regards,
Matthias
Am 08.07.2014 um 02:26 schrieb Dr. Hawkins :
> I would, though, be inclined to use the mill
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Pierre Sahores
wrote:
> So amazingly elegant ! Thanks for sharing this, Matthias ;D
>
I would, though, be inclined to use the milliseconds instead, as this is
close to predictable . . .
--
Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq.
(702) 508-8462
___
So amazingly elegant ! Thanks for sharing this, Matthias ;D
Le 8 juil. 2014 à 00:58, Matthias Rebbe | M-R-D
a écrit :
> Hi,
> i don´t know if this of use for someone, but here is a function, which
> creates a one time password (OTP).
> There are many devices out there (like routers) which off
