On 9/9/2015 2:32 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
> Paul Dupuis wrote:
> > However, I have run into a puzzler. Under Windows 8 (and Win 7) when I
> > set the effective rect of a stack to 0,0,x,y or set the effective
> > topLeft of a stack to 0,0, that stack is NOT taking into account the
> > wider window
Thanks Paul, good to know.
Regards,
Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, UX/UI Design
On 9/9/15, 11:43 AM, "Paul Dupuis" wrote:
>Scott,
>
>See the dictionary entry for "rectangle". There is a specific note that,
>as of LC6, the effective rect of a stack includes its decorations and
Scott,
See the dictionary entry for "rectangle". There is a specific note that,
as of LC6, the effective rect of a stack includes its decorations and
window borders and is also settable. IMHO it was one of the best new
features of LC6+. What I did nto realize, but discovered this week was
that you
Paul Dupuis wrote:
> However, I have run into a puzzler. Under Windows 8 (and Win 7) when I
> set the effective rect of a stack to 0,0,x,y or set the effective
> topLeft of a stack to 0,0, that stack is NOT taking into account the
> wider window borders of Windows 7 and 8 and is positioning the st
This sounds like there's a legacy flag on those older stacks but I'm not sure
what it might be.
If you file a bug report and attach one of the stacks or send one to Hanson
we'll take a look.
Mark.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 9 Sep 2015, at 19:11, Paul Dupuis wrote:
>
> I have an application (m
Dumb comment/question on my part: I always thought the effective keyword
was for reading only -- didn't think it was settable. From the docs:
The effective keyword is implemented internally as a property and appears
in the propertyNames. However, it cannot be used as a prop in an
expression, nor
