Re: Wasm and the LC Roadmap

David Bovill wrote: > Anyone know the wasm plans? > > I’m Woking on a project in collaboration with a number of other > platforms and partners that are using wasm. Would like to play > in the same place with LiveCode. Given the vast gulf between the browser DOM and LC's object model, and the li

Re: Wasm and the LC Roadmap

Wasm is a pretty mature target by now. Most of the projects I work with already have deployments using wasm on either the server side or the client side. ASP.NET and Blazer is making quite a stir. It’s not the sort of - let’s deploy it now thing - but when looking at a partnership between severa

Re: Wasm and the LC Roadmap

Let me begin by saying that WASM is not a silver bullet. I know this doesn’t happen on our community, and that David is not mentioning WASM as a magical solution for HTML5 deployment. A bit of context is needed to understand why WASM is important and cool. In the past, many C/C++ to Web solutio

Re: Wasm and the LC Roadmap

Well done Klaus, I was still Googling it! I am in fact looking at articles (e.g. https://blog.bitsrc.io/whats-wrong-with-web-assembly-3b9abb671ec2 ) that suggest that despite some very significant users (Google Earth is one), wa

Re: Wasm and the LC Roadmap

To all who are also not familiar witht the gazillion abbreviations, David is talking about -> WebaSseMbly :-) > Am 17.02.2021 um 16:13 schrieb David Bovill via use-livecode > : > > Anyone know the wasm plans? > > I’m Woking on a project in collaboration with a number of other platforms and > p