Re: Strange...

put "777,50,1424,1" into tCoords put item 1 of tCoords > -32768 AND \ item 2 of tCoords > -32768 AND \ item 3 of tCoords < 32767 AND \ item 4 of tCoords < 32767 AND \ "936,474" is within tCoords --> true put "777,50,1424,10" into tCoords put item 1 of tCoords > -32768 AND \ item 2 of tCoor

Re: Strange...

Le 2024-08-28 13:52, Klaus major-k via use-livecode a écrit : should suffice for a simple addressbook app. :-) yep, but not for processing any kind of raw data... ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to

Re: Strange...

> Am 28.08.2024 um 19:07 schrieb Brian Milby via use-livecode > : > > Exactly (that is essentially what I did) > > The actual full rect is: > (-32768,-32768,32767,32767) should suffice for a simple addressbook app. :-) > Brian Milby > br...@milby7.com > >> On Aug 28, 2024, at 11:19 AM, Bob

Re: Strange...

Exactly (that is essentially what I did) The actual full rect is: (-32768,-32768,32767,32767) Brian Milby br...@milby7.com > On Aug 28, 2024, at 11:19 AM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode > wrote: > > Easy enough to test. > > put ("936,474" is within "777,50,1424,32767”) —> true > put ("936,474

Re: Strange...

Easy enough to test. put ("936,474" is within "777,50,1424,32767”) —> true put ("936,474" is within "777,50,1424,32768”) —> false Bob S > On Aug 28, 2024, at 5:17 AM, Brian Milby via use-livecode > wrote: > > Looks like ~32k is the max value allowed for a coordinate value. > > Brian Milby

Re: Strange...

Looks like ~32k is the max value allowed for a coordinate value. Brian Milby br...@milby7.com > On Aug 28, 2024, at 4:22 AM, jbv via use-livecode > wrote: > > ("936,474" is within "777,50,1424,1") -> true > > ("936,474" is within "777,50,1424,10") -> false > > LC 9.6.9 on Mac OSX 10

Re: Strange syntax in new widgets!?

Hi Mike, > Am 25.05.2024 um 17:07 schrieb Mike Kerner via use-livecode > : > > a couple of notes on bob's comments: > * the widgets were written by a third party using lcb. lc purchased the > source. AHA! Well, that explains the "inconsistency" in the syntax. > unfortunately, the source is cl

Re: Strange syntax in new widgets!?

a couple of notes on bob's comments: * the widgets were written by a third party using lcb. lc purchased the source. unfortunately, the source is closed, so your ability to improve them is limited. (then there's the whole matter of the property editor and property inspector not being documented, wh

Re: Strange syntax in new widgets!?

Yes I was very surprised when first working with widgets how limited their list of commands and properties are. The only widget I use is the segmented control, and only then because the tab panel looks godaweful ugly in Windows, and I can maintain visual constancy using the segmented control. We

Re: Strange syntax in new widgets!?

Hi Bob, > Am 21.05.2024 um 17:09 schrieb Bob Sneidar via use-livecode > : > > I find a lot of the widget properties less than useful. Try setting the > widths of all the tabs of a segmented control to a specified width based upon > the total width of the widget. no, I won't! :-D > Bob S > >

Re: Strange syntax in new widgets!?

I find a lot of the widget properties less than useful. Try setting the widths of all the tabs of a segmented control to a specified width based upon the total width of the widget. Bob S On May 21, 2024, at 7:48 AM, Klaus major-k via use-livecode wrote: Hi firends, this came up in the LC f

Re: Strange closeStack behavior

Okay, so I've come up with a relatively simple way to go about this. The problem is that when in standalone mode, closeStack does not close the splash stack, so the app keeps running even though there are no open windows, so I need to quit when the mainStack closes. But in Development mode, I

Re: Strange closeStack behavior

Got it thanks. That explains why I cannot even trap for closeStackRequest int othe substack script. The really odd thing is I can in the message box enter "close stack Time Calculator" and it closes without even bothering to ask if I want to save it, even when it is "dirty". I was thinking of

Re: Strange closeStack behavior

On 10/4/21 12:14 PM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote: The stack in question is the only substack of a couple without a custom menu, so I am wondering if the last stack with a custom menu becomes the topStack?? If there is no custom menu then LC's menu takes over, and that's the one that tri

Re: Strange closeStack behavior

So my only solution I can come up with to keep this from happening is to disable the Close Window control, then add a button that saves the stack then closes it. It's ugly, but what else can I do. For my part, if a stack is a substack of a mainstack and I close it, the Save dialog should not pre

Re: Strange closeStack behavior

Okay, so I went through every closeStack and closeStackRequest handler in ALL my stacks and libraries and commented out the handlers. The problem persists. The stack in question is the only substack of a couple without a custom menu, so I am wondering if the last stack with a custom menu becomes

Re: Strange closeStack behavior

Ohhh good suggestion I'll do that. Bob S > On Oct 4, 2021, at 06:30 , Craig Newman via use-livecode > wrote: > > Hi. > > Maybe just before the closeStackRequest line, ask for the topStack. Is it > possible the mainStack is somehow in front? > > Craig > >> On Oct 1, 2021, at 6:22 PM, Bob

Re: Strange closeStack behavior

Hi. Maybe just before the closeStackRequest line, ask for the topStack. Is it possible the mainStack is somehow in front? Craig > On Oct 1, 2021, at 6:22 PM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode > wrote: > > Hi all. > > Very strange. I have a substance belonging to a mainstack that has LOTS of >

Re: Strange script error - pass openStack

Craig: > I will indeed get an error in the message box > if I just invoke “openStack” directly. So Peter, make sure whether this bug is your original issue, and not just a red herring from the debugging itself. Either way: > 3. But the home.livecodescript code could be more robust. > (Always

Re: Strange script error - pass openStack

Hi. You are getting the error message in the message box? If I make a new stack and place your handler in the card script, I will indeed get an error in the message box if I just invoke “openStack” directly. Of course, if I “send openStack to this card” all works fine. Placing a red dot shoul

Re: Strange script error - pass openStack

Peter: > I’ve just tried making a new stack that has: > on openStack >pass openStack > end openStack 1. Make sure this openStack is in your first CARD's script. > I poked into the script of the stack home.livecodescript > and see these lines > if the short name of the owner of the target

Re: Strange bug

I will attest to the fact that strange things happen with drag drop and not just with Livecode. For instance if I drag a PDF to a mounted share, often, but not every time, Mail becomes unresponsive and I have to quit it and relaunch it. Also when drag dropping files from the Finder onto a Liveco

Re: Strange bug

Yes, as described (LC 9.6.1, macOS 11.1 Beta). On 24.11.20 14:32, Klaus major-k via use-livecode wrote: Hi friends, FYI: I found a very strange and serious bug, if you have a minute, please take a look: A real showstopper in my opinion! Wit

Re: Strange bug

Hi Matthias, > Am 24.11.2020 um 14:02 schrieb Klaus major-k : > > Hi Matthias, > >> Am 24.11.2020 um 13:46 schrieb improve-revolution-010...@m-r-d.de: >> >> May this is because the drapDrop message is still processed or how this is >> called in english. > > yes, that is what I think, too. >

Re: Strange bug

> Am 24.11.2020 um 13:32 schrieb Klaus major-k via use-livecode > : > > Hi friends, > > FYI: I found a very strange and serious bug, if you have a minute, please > take a look: > > A real showstopper in my opinion! > > With an example sta

RE: Strange behavior between Mysql, MariaDB and SSL.

Thanks Mattias, I appreciate your knowledge. You are very useful and kind (as always). Best, Hery From: matthias_livecode_150...@m-r-d.de Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020 12:09 PM To: How to use LiveCode Cc: htorr...@networkdreams.net Subject: Re: Strange behavior between Mysql

RE: Strange behavior between Mysql, MariaDB and SSL.

Subject: Re: Strange behavior between Mysql, MariaDB and SSL. You are correct. But as Heriberto wort, it is an inhouse app, i thought using ODBC connector from Oracle might be better than lowering the security level of the database. - Matthias Rebbe Life Is Too Short For Boring Code > Am 27.08.2

RE: Strange behavior between Mysql, MariaDB and SSL.

20 11:41 AM To: How to use LiveCode Cc: Bob Sneidar Subject: Re: Strange behavior between Mysql, MariaDB and SSL. Just a heads up, ODBC is a local service, not a network protocol. You have to create a DSN on the client OS which handles the network communications for you. So every client that con

Re: Strange behavior between Mysql, MariaDB and SSL.

necting to MySQL using ODBC instead of the built-in LiveCode > MySQL client? > > Best, > Hery > > -Original Message- > From: use-livecode On Behalf Of > matthias rebbe via use-livecode > Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2020 10:42 AM > To: How to use LiveCode > Cc:

Re: Strange behavior between Mysql, MariaDB and SSL.

Of course it was meant to be "But as Heriberto wrote,.." - Matthias Rebbe Life Is Too Short For Boring Code > Am 27.08.2020 um 17:55 schrieb matthias_livecode_150...@m-r-d.de: > > You are correct. > But as Heriberto wort, it is an inhouse app, i thought using ODBC connector > from Oracle m

Re: Strange behavior between Mysql, MariaDB and SSL.

You are correct. But as Heriberto wort, it is an inhouse app, i thought using ODBC connector from Oracle might be better than lowering the security level of the database. - Matthias Rebbe Life Is Too Short For Boring Code > Am 27.08.2020 um 17:40 schrieb Bob Sneidar via use-livecode > : > >

Re: Strange behavior between Mysql, MariaDB and SSL.

Just a heads up, ODBC is a local service, not a network protocol. You have to create a DSN on the client OS which handles the network communications for you. So every client that connects will need to have this DSN set up first. For the experienced, this is no big deal, but for the first time in

RE: Strange behavior between Mysql, MariaDB and SSL.

: matthias_livecode_150...@m-r-d.de Subject: Re: Strange behavior between Mysql, MariaDB and SSL. There are also free MySQL Connectors/ODBC available for different operating systems. The current ones are for Server 8.0,5.7 and 5.6. https://dev.mysql.com/downloads/connector/odbc/ They connectors can be downloaded

RE: Strange behavior between Mysql, MariaDB and SSL.

09 AM To: How to use LiveCode Cc: panagiotis merakos Subject: Re: Strange behavior between Mysql, MariaDB and SSL. Hello all, This is because MySQL 8 supports a stronger authentication method based on SHA256, and this method is used by default. LiveCode (as well as some other MySQL conne

RE: Strange behavior between Mysql, MariaDB and SSL.

- From: use-livecode On Behalf Of Bob Sneidar via use-livecode Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2020 11:40 AM To: How to use LiveCode Cc: Bob Sneidar Subject: Re: Strange behavior between Mysql, MariaDB and SSL. mySQL for which platform? Last I checked, the build for Windows did NOT support

Re: Strange behavior between Mysql, MariaDB and SSL.

There are also free MySQL Connectors/ODBC available for different operating systems. The current ones are for Server 8.0,5.7 and 5.6. https://dev.mysql.com/downloads/connector/odbc/ They connectors can be downloaded without the need to be logged in. So no need for an account registration at dev

Re: Strange behavior between Mysql, MariaDB and SSL.

Hello all, This is because MySQL 8 supports a stronger authentication method based on SHA256, and this method is used by default. LiveCode (as well as some other MySQL connectors/clients) do not support this authentication method yet. In this case, you could configure your MySQL installation to u

Re: Strange behavior between Mysql, MariaDB and SSL.

mySQL for which platform? Last I checked, the build for Windows did NOT support encryption. There is a special branch that does, but I could never get it to work. What I came up with is an agent that resides on the SQL server, built in Livecode that listens for connections. It then handles the

Re: Strange times, amazing projects

Skip, have you tried the Google geocoding web service? Give it an address or landmark, and get back latitude/longitude coordinates. https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/geocoding/start Fairly simple to get into, a snap to implement in LiveCode, and free until you exceed a certain nu

Re: strange problems with SEND: SOLVED

Hi all, DIY problems are the best, right? 8-) OK, everything works as advertized when you substitute the CORRECT variable for X in for "send... in X secs". I was adding "the seconds" which explains the resulting year 2070! :-D Sorry for the false alarm and thanks for the feedback and hints! I

Re: strange problems with SEND

Hi Mark, > Am 17.01.2020 um 18:31 schrieb Mark Waddingham via use-livecode > : > > On 2020-01-17 17:24, Klaus major-k via use-livecode wrote: >> ouch, sorry, TRUE! :-/ >> However the other message "onlinekursinfo" is also from me and I have >> no idea why it should be delivered on: >> Sunday, Fe

Re: strange problems with SEND

On 2020-01-17 17:24, Klaus major-k via use-livecode wrote: ouch, sorry, TRUE! :-/ However the other message "onlinekursinfo" is also from me and I have no idea why it should be delivered on: Sunday, February 2, 2070, I did not script that!? I think you did ... Accidentally... THAT script als

Re: strange problems with SEND

Hi Matthias, > Am 17.01.2020 um 17:28 schrieb Matthias Rebbe via use-livecode > : > > Tested here with LC 9.51 and 9.6.0DP2 and both were successfull. yes, error on my side, THIS pending message is correct. It is another handler that I will have to check again. Thanks! Best Klaus -- Klaus M

Re: strange problems with SEND

Hi Mark, > Am 17.01.2020 um 17:29 schrieb Mark Waddingham via use-livecode > : > > Double check your pending messages after the send - the line you quoted > doesn’t match the name of the handler in send... ouch, sorry, TRUE! :-/ However the other message "onlinekursinfo" is also from me and I

Re: strange problems with SEND

Tested here with LC 9.51 and 9.6.0DP2 and both were successfull. I´ve extended your script, so it also checks/show the delivery time. on mouseup put the date into tDatum convert tDatum from date to dateitems add 1 to item 8 of tDatum put 8 into item 4 of tDatum ## dateitems: # 1. the year

Re: strange problems with SEND

Double check your pending messages after the send - the line you quoted doesn’t match the name of the handler in send... Warmest Regards, Mark. Sent from my iPhone > On 17 Jan 2020, at 15:46, Klaus major-k via use-livecode > wrote: > > HI all, > > I want to execute a handler in the future

Re: strange problems with SEND

Hi Bob, > Am 17.01.2020 um 17:21 schrieb Bob Sneidar via use-livecode > : > > This got me thinking, I've pondered a way to run scheduled tasks, and how I > would go about it. I think what I would do is have a faceless standalone that > once launched sent a command in time every second, or 5 se

Re: strange problems with SEND

This got me thinking, I've pondered a way to run scheduled tasks, and how I would go about it. I think what I would do is have a faceless standalone that once launched sent a command in time every second, or 5 seconds or whatever, and the handler would then check a list or a database for tasks w

Re: strange problems with SEND

Hi all, > Am 17.01.2020 um 16:58 schrieb Klaus major-k via use-livecode > : > > Just tested this in LC 5.02 and it worked as exspected! > The pendingmessages show 1579330812.096689 as "delivery" time > which resolves nicely to -> Saturday, January 18, 2020 > > Tested also in LC 9.05 and it work

Re: strange problems with SEND

Just tested this in LC 5.02 and it worked as exspected! The pendingmessages show 1579330812.096689 as "delivery" time which resolves nicely to -> Saturday, January 18, 2020 Tested also in LC 9.05 and it works as exspected, too!? A new bug? :-/ > Am 17.01.2020 um 16:46 schrieb Klaus major-k via u

Re: strange problems with SEND

Hi all, this is on LC 9.5.1 on macOS 10.14.6. > Am 17.01.2020 um 16:46 schrieb Klaus major-k via use-livecode > : > > HI all, > > I want to execute a handler in the future -> tomorrow at 8:00 AM > So I scripted: > ... > put the date into tDatum > convert tDatum from date to dateitems > add 1 t

Re: Strange artifacts DG2 on Android and Native fields not always sowing

Created a bug report and send video to Panos. https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=22231 Op 8-7-2019 om 22:37 schreef JJS via use-livecode: Hi, i'm getting strange artifacts on 2 different Android devices. 1st is a tablet Android 4.4.2 2nd is a phone Android 8.1 The DG2 is a table

Re: Strange error from iOS Standalone Builder

Not knowing much specifically about these problems, but having some experience in secure communications as an IT person, encryption standards are in a state of constant flux. Old ciphers are abandoned over time and new ones are implemented. I've mentioned before the debaucle in the copier indust

RE: Strange error from iOS Standalone Builder

I got this exact error recently(a week ago) when I renewed my development certificate. I deleted the renewed certificate and then recreated it, downloaded it and then edited all the provisioning profiles and assigned them to the renewed certificate. Deleted all the provisioning profiles on the M

Re: Strange error from iOS Standalone Builder

That is a good point. You can have an account with no password set, but a number of things will not work with it, including the keychain which I believe MUST have a password. Bob S > On May 28, 2018, at 11:16 , prothero--- via use-livecode > wrote: > > I think this is the admin password fo

Re: Strange error from iOS Standalone Builder

I think this is the admin password for your Macintosh. If you haven’t set one, you do this in System Preferences, under the Apple symbol at upper left. Click on “Users and Groups” and you will see the “Change Password” button. Bill William Prothero http://earthlearningsolutions.org > On May 28

Re: Strange problem with tsNet external on Windows

I finally answered my own question - it was simple and I was nearly right in my first guess. I forgot to include the ‘Externals’ folder in the files and folders encapsulated by the PC installer maker. I suppose I live too much in the Mac world. The live program looks for an ‘Externals’ folder in

RE: Strange problem with tsNet external on Windows

Graham, Also check tsNet, it's way down at the bottom of the inclusions pane. Or you can disable tsNet and use only libURL. Here are a couple of handlers to find out if is tsNet is enabled. Below that is how to explicitly enable/disable tsNet. function GetNetworkType local tLibUrlDriver

Re: strange behaviour of standalone builder

Ah. I misunderstood your post. Bob S > On Feb 12, 2018, at 07:53 , Bob Sneidar via use-livecode > wrote: > > This is the same discussion I have been having for over a year now. Maybe 2. > The workaround is to only build for one platform at a time, and quit LC > between builds. LC seems to

Re: strange behaviour of standalone builder

This is the same discussion I have been having for over a year now. Maybe 2. The workaround is to only build for one platform at a time, and quit LC between builds. LC seems to be getting confused about which is the original and which is the copy. It makes a mess of the stack files in your proje

Re: strange behaviour of standalone builder

Hallo Hermann, > Am 12.02.2018 um 15:22 schrieb hh via use-livecode > : > > Hi Klaus, > the move to "engine" is documented, see specialfolder/engine. > > This is the only "logic" way to do that because your "CLI" files are > executables. > That is Mac is correct in docu and building the standa

Re: strange behaviour of standalone builder

Hi Klaus, the move to "engine" is documented, see specialfolder/engine. This is the only "logic" way to do that because your "CLI" files are executables. That is Mac is correct in docu and building the standalone. The bug is now either the docu for Win/linux or the not-moving on Win/linux. > Kl

Re: Strange permissions issues calling 'shell' in Windows

> On 31 Oct 2017, at 9:40 pm, Ben Rubinstein via use-livecode > wrote: > > Is there some way that calling 'shell' enters a context with less permission > than the app which calls it? And is there something I can do about this? LiveCode’s shell function on windows is basically telling cmd.exe

Re: Strange permissions issues calling 'shell' in Windows

nvm my response, my earlier message poofed due to size. *sigh* here goes again... one thing you might try is to look at the properties for the scheduled job. You obviously have it set to "run whether user is logged in or not" but i'm wondering if "do not store password" box is checked. If it is,

Re: Strange permissions issues calling 'shell' in Windows

i'm on 10, no clue what earlier versions would look like. On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > Windows 10? > > Bob S > > > > ___ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.

Re: Strange permissions issues calling 'shell' in Windows

Windows 10? Bob S ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Re: Strange permissions issues calling 'shell' in Windows

Hi Bob, Thanks for taking the trouble to consider this. The first thing that comes to my mind is, where are you putting the log file? If you are using a specialfolderpath that only has a context when logged in, then that might be an issue. It isn't that, the file is being created, the output

Re: Strange permissions issues calling 'shell' in Windows

The first thing that comes to my mind is, where are you putting the log file? If you are using a specialfolderpath that only has a context when logged in, then that might be an issue. As far as the firewall goes, unless you or your IT team has intentionally blocked RPC traffic, it should have an

Re: strange experience in Windows standalone with windowshape

Perhaps, in my subconscious, Danny Kaye was my inspiration! (Now I need to focus on getting better and getting back to work.) > On Jun 15, 2016, at 9:24 AM, Quentin Long wrote: > > sez Dar Scott: >> Be careful! There are some things you can do with 'do' >> but can't send with 'send'. Also, as

Re: strange experience in Windows standalone with windowshape

sez Dar Scott: > Be careful! There are some things you can do with 'do' > but can't send with 'send'. Also, as I recall, not all you > can 'call' can lend itself to 'send'. I've seen things that > 'do' did but sent d'n't. Also, a sending pending is not > the same as a do doing since a pending s

Re: strange experience in Windows standalone with windowshape

Hi Scott, > Am 15.06.2016 um 02:00 schrieb Scott Rossi : > On 6/14/16, 1:20 PM, "use-livecode on behalf of Klaus major-k" > > wrote: > >> Hi Dar, >>> Am 14.06.2016 um 22:13 schrieb Dar Scott : >>> Now that is goofy. Why would that work and Scott's not? >> well, that's a rhetorical question, rig

Re: strange experience in Windows standalone with windowshape

On 6/14/16, 1:20 PM, "use-livecode on behalf of Klaus major-k" wrote: >Hi Dra, > >> Am 14.06.2016 um 22:13 schrieb Dar Scott : >> >> Now that is goofy. Why would that work and Scott's not? > >well, that's a rhetorical question, right? ;-) > >I added an appropriate comment to the bug report! >

Re: strange experience in Windows standalone with windowshape

I kept expecting it to turn into a full blown tale of daring "do", a "call" to arms, and code troops sending pending. Thanks for the time you 'put into it', I like 'the result' On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Dar Scott wrote: > Actually not! I have just gotten over some under-the-weather and I

Re: strange experience in Windows standalone with windowshape

Actually not! I have just gotten over some under-the-weather and I need to get back to work. Work, Dar, work! But, I am feeling a lot better. I just wanted to say that send is much like do but I forgot what the differences were. > On Jun 14, 2016, at 4:37 PM, Phil Davis wrote: > > Dar

Re: strange experience in Windows standalone with windowshape

Dar clearly has too much time on his hands. ;-) Phil Davis On 6/14/16 3:34 PM, Mike Bonner wrote: I've read this 3 times now and I'm still fascinated. On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Dar Scott wrote: Be careful! There are some things you can do with 'do' but can't send with 'send'. Als

Re: strange experience in Windows standalone with windowshape

I've read this 3 times now and I'm still fascinated. On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Dar Scott wrote: > Be careful! There are some things you can do with 'do' but can't send > with 'send'. Also, as I recall, not all you can 'call' can lend itself to > 'send'. I've seen things that 'do' did b

Re: strange experience in Windows standalone with windowshape

ture ;-) > Good to know this! > > > Sent from solidit > > -Original Message- > From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf > Of Klaus major-k > Sent: dinsdag 14 juni 2016 22:08 > To: How to use LiveCode > Subject: Re: st

Re: strange experience in Windows standalone with windowshape

Ah well, I was hoping. On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Klaus major-k wrote: > Hi Mike, > > > Am 15.06.2016 um 00:00 schrieb Mike Bonner : > > > > Silly question but.. Is the image id that you're setting your windowshape > > to an imported image or a referenced image? While it doesn't explain t

Re: strange experience in Windows standalone with windowshape

Hi Mike, > Am 15.06.2016 um 00:00 schrieb Mike Bonner : > > Silly question but.. Is the image id that you're setting your windowshape > to an imported image or a referenced image? While it doesn't explain the > 2nd window having a windowshape and the first not (unless both do have > windowshapes

Re: strange experience in Windows standalone with windowshape

Silly question but.. Is the image id that you're setting your windowshape to an imported image or a referenced image? While it doesn't explain the 2nd window having a windowshape and the first not (unless both do have windowshapes set...) ,it might explain why the windowshape for the first is blan

Re: strange experience in Windows standalone with windowshape

The whole thing is goofy. Why is openStack behaving like preOpenStack just because it's a non-standard window style? -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Systems Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web __

Re: strange experience in Windows standalone with windowshape

Of course. It is a bug. Bugs are supposed to act strange. > On Jun 14, 2016, at 2:20 PM, Klaus major-k wrote: > > Hi Dra, > >> Am 14.06.2016 um 22:13 schrieb Dar Scott : >> >> Now that is goofy. Why would that work and Scott's not? > > well, that's a rhetorical question, right? ;-) >

Re: strange experience in Windows standalone with windowshape

Hi Dra, > Am 14.06.2016 um 22:13 schrieb Dar Scott : > > Now that is goofy. Why would that work and Scott's not? well, that's a rhetorical question, right? ;-) I added an appropriate comment to the bug report! > Did you remember the "in 5 seconds" for his? >From the card script: ... sen

Re: strange experience in Windows standalone with windowshape

Now that is goofy. Why would that work and Scott's not? Did you remember the "in 5 seconds" for his? > On Jun 14, 2016, at 2:07 PM, Klaus major-k wrote: > > Hi Dar, > >> Am 14.06.2016 um 21:51 schrieb Dar Scott : >> >> Without knowing the context and just adding random things: >> >> send

RE: strange experience in Windows standalone with windowshape

This is what we call "the slang language of LiveCode" feature ;-) Good to know this! Sent from solidit -Original Message- From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf Of Klaus major-k Sent: dinsdag 14 juni 2016 22:08 To: How to use LiveCode S

Re: strange experience in Windows standalone with windowshape

Hi Dar, > Am 14.06.2016 um 21:51 schrieb Dar Scott : > > Without knowing the context and just adding random things: > > send "go next card" to me in 5 seconds that was the next thing to try, and YES, that actually works! :-) >> On Jun 14, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Scott Rossi wrote: >> >> Hi Klaus

Re: strange experience in Windows standalone with windowshape

Hi Scott, > Am 14.06.2016 um 21:38 schrieb Scott Rossi : > > Hi Klaus: > > I may not have seen all your responses, but did you try adding "with > messages" to your code or delaying the card advance using "end in"? > > wait 5 secs with messages > > Or: > > send "goNextCard" to me in 5 seconds

Re: strange experience in Windows standalone with windowshape

Without knowing the context and just adding random things: send "go next card" to me in 5 seconds > On Jun 14, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Scott Rossi wrote: > > Hi Klaus: > > I may not have seen all your responses, but did you try adding "with > messages" to your code or delaying the card advance u

Re: strange experience in Windows standalone with windowshape

Hi Klaus: I may not have seen all your responses, but did you try adding "with messages" to your code or delaying the card advance using "end in"? wait 5 secs with messages Or: send "goNextCard" to me in 5 seconds command goNextCard go next cd end goNextCard Regards, Scott Rossi Creative

Re: strange experience in Windows standalone with windowshape

I'll keep my fingers crossed that its located and fixed. If I find a reliable recipe I'll report it, but so far no luck. (the same standalone does sometimes start correctly. Annoying!) On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Paul Dupuis wrote: > On 6/14/2016 11:47 AM, Mike Bonner wrote: > > Paul, I'v

Re: strange experience in Windows standalone with windowshape

On 6/14/2016 11:47 AM, Mike Bonner wrote: > Paul, I've seen this too. Launch a standalone and it doesn't show. I've > only seen this when using the browser widget as part of the build. (haven't > really used other widgets, so I can't speak for those) If I then go into > task manager and tell it

Re: strange experience in Windows standalone with windowshape

Paul, I've seen this too. Launch a standalone and it doesn't show. I've only seen this when using the browser widget as part of the build. (haven't really used other widgets, so I can't speak for those) If I then go into task manager and tell it to create a dump file for my application, poof.. i

Re: strange experience in Windows standalone with windowshape

On 6/14/2016 9:56 AM, Klaus major-k wrote: > Hi all, > > i have a stack with a "splash" screen which has an windowshape set. > > I has a script like this: > on opencard > wait 5 secs > go next cd > end opencard > > In a standalone on a Mac, everything works as exspected, on Windows > I see NOTH

Re: strange experience in Windows standalone with windowshape

Hi Paul, > Am 14.06.2016 um 16:48 schrieb Paul Dupuis : > > On 6/14/2016 9:56 AM, Klaus major-k wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> i have a stack with a "splash" screen which has an windowshape set. >> >> I has a script like this: >> on opencard >> wait 5 secs >> go next cd >> end opencard >> >> In a s

Re: Strange bevavious

@Jacques Thanks for the hint. Never had looked into that preferences tab. Tried at once and restarted. Was worth a try but had no effect. But I saw there, that LC tries to accesss my calendar (of course I disabled that) ... I also rebuilt permissions and cleared the dyldd's shared cache. No effec

Re: Strange bevavious

Same (very annoying) problem :-( Well, my system doesn’t crash, but it still takes anywhere from 50 to 130 seconds for the system to unfreeze… Met vriendelijke groeten, Warm Regards, Ton Kuypers +32 (0) 477 739 530 Steenweg op Leopoldsburg 100 • B-2490 • Balen • Belgium www.publishingtools4

Re: Strange bevavious

It looks like a Gatekeeper problem. What happens if you "Allow apps downloaded from Anywhere"? On 12/19/2015 12:51 PM, [-hh] wrote: Hi all, the sleeping-disk effect is true here, I can win 1-2 seconds of 3-5 seconds at start of dialog. But this is with ALL apps, not only LC. And it is for the

Re: Strange bevavious

Hi all, the sleeping-disk effect is true here, I can win 1-2 seconds of 3-5 seconds at start of dialog. But this is with ALL apps, not only LC. And it is for the first part of the dialog only, before creating the list. The following is logged from the second part of an "open-stack"-dialog, afte

Re: Strange bevavious

Whenever I get inexplicably odd behavior, I run Disc Warrior on my system drive. Strange things can be induced by disc errors, which seem to constantly creep into my computer. Bill William Prothero http://es.earthednet.org > On Dec 19, 2015, at 8:27 AM, "tkuyp...@telenet.be" > wrote: > > Tha

Re: Strange bevavious

Thans Thierry, posted my issue in BugZilla, but it looks like I have to live with it for a while I guess... Met vriendelijke groeten, Warm Regards, Ton Kuypers +32 (0) 477 739 530 Steenweg op Leopoldsburg 100 • B-2490 • Balen • Belgium www.publishingtools4u.com

  1   2   3   4   >