Edit;
get a grip on creating custom visual effect that I can use "all over the place"
by creating an external script/text stack
-
Exactly
I'm studying scripts by some "pros" (Jacque, David, Malte-animation engine)
in order to get a group on creating custom visu
Exactly
I'm studying scripts by some "pros" (Jacque, David, Malte-animation engine)
in order to get a group on creating custom visual effect that I can use "all
over the place" but creating an external script/text stack
I've been doing server side script for so many years, the whole UI coding i
I want to create a variable called tTargetField so I use
put "Hello" into tTargetField
Now I want to put something into a field so I create a variable called
tTargetField2 and
put the long id of field "foo" into tTargetfield2
Then to put something into the field I
put "Hello" into tTargetField2
Hmmm.
SetProps notwithstanding, one could;
on mouseUp
put the name of fld 1 into hh
set the abc of hh to "xyz"
end mouseUp
This will indeed create a custom property (abc) of field 1 and set it to
"xyz". In this case LC evaluates the variable "hh" as an object reference. I
would have though
(mostly to solidify the memory for myself)
set the text of tObjectReference gives the engine enough clue to know that
you're setting a property (set the text of) so the next thing needs to be
an object reference.
put "fred" into tObjectReference is ambiguous because you can put fred into
tname or a
Agreed. Please enlighten. I had this problem when getting the controls in a
group, parsing out the fields, then trying to get the contents. I did this
because I had some fields named the same, but they were in different groups, so
I wanted only the one in the specified group.
Bill
> On Jan 24,
I am not sure what you mean.
Both lines of code seem fine. What is not working?
Craig Newman
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Storing-and-object-reference-in-a-var-tp4711908p4711919.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nab
ha! duh! I need to go body surfing for a day and get away from the code
… I'm "losing it"
Put "hello" into tTargetField# replace the long id in the var with "hello"
sheesh…
this get set prop thing has a lot of power, one day I'll wrap my head around it.
On 1/24/17, 12:57 PM, "use-
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 4:19 PM, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> But better news: Zombies will buy anything. We'll be rich.
I think the average zombie has far less money than my average bankruptcy
client . . . they always seem to get cheated by the prior
On 1/24/17 6:12 PM, Monte Goulding via use-livecode wrote:
On 25 Jan 2017, at 10:58 am, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
wrote:
Good news: In v10 the LiveCode language will be reduced to a
single command, "build", which will automatically build whatever
you're imagining.
Bad news: Requireme
> On 25 Jan 2017, at 10:58 am, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Good news: In v10 the LiveCode language will be reduced to a single command,
> "build", which will automatically build whatever you're imagining.
>
> Bad news: Requirements for the new interface include a state-issu
Bob Sneidar wrote:
> On Jan 24, 2017, at 14:57 , Monte Goulding wrote:
>
> You are writing ambiguous code and the engine can’t read your mind ;-)
>
> Not until V10 anyways.
Good news: In v10 the LiveCode language will be reduced to a single
command, "build", which will automatically build what
On Jan 24, 2017, at 14:57 , Monte Goulding via use-livecode
mailto:use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>> wrote:
You are writing ambiguous code and the engine can’t read your mind ;-)
Not until V10 anyways.
Bob S
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@
> On 25 Jan 2017, at 9:53 am, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> put the long id of fld "daily-lesson-text" into tTargetField
> put "Hello" into tTargetField
>
> what am I doing wrong?
You are writing ambiguous code and the engine can’t read your mind ;-)
Try:
set the
14 matches
Mail list logo
