Re: Spell check for text fields

2012-02-24 Thread Scott McDonald
>Seems under the Future Field modifications they are allowing the >inline underlining of words I will be checking out this feature with interest. - -- Scott McDonald "Components, Controls, Tools and Resources for LiveCode" www.runrevplanet.com -- View this message in context: http://runtime-

Re: Spell check for text fields

2012-02-23 Thread Michael Chean
Well this may change the situation: http://www.runrev.com/newsletter/february/issue129/newsletter1.php?a=NWS129 Seems under the Future Field modifications they are allowing the inline underlining of words. Very nice.___ use-livecode mailing list use

Re: Spell check for text fields

2012-02-12 Thread Scott McDonald
Hi Pete, Thanks for the encouraging words. - -- Scott McDonald "Components, Controls, Tools and Resources for LiveCode" www.runrevplanet.com -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Spell-check-for-text-fields-tp4379716p4382460.html Sent from the Revolu

Re: Spell check for text fields

2012-02-12 Thread Pete
Hi Scott, Yes, I agree, stuff like that is probably a nightmare to maintain. I'm not saying that RunRev should implement native spell checking where available, just that it would be a nice native feature for some apps and that there's a history of them implementing stuff that isn't cross platform

Re: Spell check for text fields

2012-02-12 Thread Scott McDonald
>For example, LC supports access to the Windows registry and there is >no such thing on OS X or Linux so calls to the LC functions for it return >"not supported". Just my opinion, but exceptions and special cases in a cross-platform tool are not to be encouraged as they have the potential to beco

Re: Spell check for text fields

2012-02-12 Thread Bob Sneidar
This is a long shot, but I wonder if you can communicate with Apple's system wide spell checker via Applescript? I have no idea what yo could use for Windows or Linux. You would have to create a rawKeyUp handler in a field, card or stack script (or even a frontScript) which would check to see i

Re: Spell check for text fields

2012-02-12 Thread Pete
Well, I have to agree that nobody has unlimited funds and time. However, cross platform adherance is somewhat selective on Runrev's part. For example, LC supports access to the Windows registry and there is no such thing on OS X or Linux so calls to the LC functions for it return "not supported".

Re: Spell check for text fields

2012-02-12 Thread Scott McDonald
>sad that sometimes, when cross-platform equals lowest common denominator, it often >precludes the more fancy OS-specific niceties. So true, but it is difficult to see any other way, unless you have unlimited funds and time to then emulate every feature on every platform. - -- Scott McDonald

Re: Spell check for text fields

2012-02-12 Thread Keith Clarke
Thanks for the clarification, Scott. Yes, sad that sometimes, when cross-platform equals lowest common denominator, it often precludes the more fancy OS-specific niceties. The (current?) field object limitation would definitely seem to be a issue for any active spell-checker, irrespective of th

Re: Spell check for text fields

2012-02-11 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 2/11/12 5:58 PM, Pete wrote: Despite the lack of full platform support, sure would be nice of LC hooked into the native spell checkers on those platforms that do support it. Sounds like a job for an external. Wonder what Monte's doing these days? -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac.

Re: Spell check for text fields

2012-02-11 Thread Pete
Despite the lack of full platform support, sure would be nice of LC hooked into the native spell checkers on those platforms that do support it. Pete On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Scott McDonald < runrevpla...@smpcs.server101.com> wrote: > Keith, > > >don't all target platforms have native spe

Re: Spell check for text fields

2012-02-11 Thread Michael Chean
Hmmm. Disappointing that. On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Scott McDonald < runrevpla...@smpcs.server101.com> wrote: > Keith, > > >don't all target platforms have native spell-checkers? > > One software segment that I produce for is cross-platform desktop -- needs > to run on PCs (with Windows XP

Re: Spell check for text fields

2012-02-11 Thread Michael Chean
It seems to work ok on the web. For text entry I think it's sort of expected that it underlines the wrong words as they are typed. On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Richmond wrote: > Spilling Chuckers . . . Hmm > > This is rather interesting: > http://norvig.com/spell-**correct.html

Re: Spell check for text fields

2012-02-11 Thread Scott McDonald
Keith, >don't all target platforms have native spell-checkers? One software segment that I produce for is cross-platform desktop -- needs to run on PCs (with Windows XP and newer) and on Macs. There is no native OS level spellchecker for Windows XP. Instead of having platform specific code to ha

Re: Spell check for text fields

2012-02-11 Thread Richmond
On 02/11/2012 11:14 PM, Mike Kerner wrote: Yep http://www.runrevplanet.com/ http://revonline2.runrev.com/stack/211/spellCheck Well, well; that made my last posting look a bit redundant. Although, quite honestly, I am rather glad, as I shall now merrily try to incorporate Craig Newman's sta

Re: Spell check for text fields

2012-02-11 Thread Richmond
On 02/11/2012 11:07 PM, Keith Clarke wrote: I'm intrigued yet confused - don't all target platforms have native spell-checkers? Why can't these be accessed? Well, it's news to me. I work mainly with Linux, and decreasingly so with Mac PPC [it's a money thing . . . :) ] and I don't think the

Re: Spell check for text fields

2012-02-11 Thread Mike Kerner
Yep http://www.runrevplanet.com/ http://revonline2.runrev.com/stack/211/spellCheck On Saturday, 11 February, 2012 at 15:15 , Michael Chean wrote: > Is there any addon that checks the spelling of words as they are entered > into a text field? > > Mike >

Re: Spell check for text fields

2012-02-11 Thread Keith Clarke
I'm intrigued yet confused - don't all target platforms have native spell-checkers? Why can't these be accessed? Best, Keith.. On 11 Feb 2012, at 20:58, Richmond wrote: > Spilling Chuckers . . . Hmm > > This is rather interesting: http://norvig.com/spell-correct.html > > as is this : http

Re: Spell check for text fields

2012-02-11 Thread Richmond
Spilling Chuckers . . . Hmm This is rather interesting: http://norvig.com/spell-correct.html as is this : http://wordlist.sourceforge.net/ I wonder how feasible (and how fast) an in-built spell-checker would be . . . certainly SCOWL 7.1 looks rather attractive. __

Re: Spell check for text fields

2012-02-11 Thread Marty Knapp
Hey Mike, Check out: http://runrev.com/store/product/runrevplanet-spell-2_0/ I've not used it personally, however, so can't comment on that. Marty K Is there any addon that checks the spelling of words as they are entered into a text field? Mike __