On 06/12/2012, at 2:15 AM, Rod McCall wrote:
> We basically need to be able to support secure data connections to/from a
> server. Based on discussions from a long time ago and also on looking at
> the LiveCode dictionary (at least in 5.5.1) there is no support for sockets.
If you are only goi
On 06/12/2012, at 5:41 AM, Mark Wieder wrote:
>> If you absolutely must use a custom protocol, you may want to contact
>> Monte about this as he's evaluating whether to make an external for that.
>
> But still no Android.
It's true that any external I write is going to be iOS only in the short
Yes, natively on both iOS and Android platforms. If needed, the mobile browser
can be used to embed HTTPS bidirectional communications.
Le 5 déc. 2012 à 17:52, Richard Gaskin a écrit :
> But if you're taking the more common approach of using a RESTful API over
> HTTP, I believe LiveCode support
Richard-
Wednesday, December 5, 2012, 8:52:02 AM, you wrote:
> If you absolutely must use a custom protocol, you may want to contact
> Monte about this as he's evaluating whether to make an external for that.
But still no Android.
> But if you're taking the more common approach of using a RESTf
Rod McCall wrote:
We are in the process of deciding whether to use LiveCode or another
platform for mobile development. I gather, well at least on looking at the
dictionary that sockets are not available on IOS or Android - at least not
directly. Are there any relatively simple extensions or nat
That would be good, we would need it for IOS and Android though.
Kind regards,
rod
On 5 December 2012 17:25, Mark Talluto wrote:
>
> On Dec 5, 2012, at 8:14 AM, Rod McCall wrote:
>
> > Thanks Mark, it looks like lack of sockets may mean the same for us.
> Anyway
> > we will decide shortly.
>
On Dec 5, 2012, at 8:14 AM, Rod McCall wrote:
> Thanks Mark, it looks like lack of sockets may mean the same for us. Anyway
> we will decide shortly.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> rod
Monte is looking to make an external that will support sockets. He mentioned
he was going to post something on thi
Thanks Mark, it looks like lack of sockets may mean the same for us. Anyway
we will decide shortly.
Kind regards,
rod
On 5 December 2012 16:52, Mark Wieder wrote:
> Rod-
>
> Wednesday, December 5, 2012, 7:15:50 AM, you wrote:
>
> > directly. Are there any relatively simple extensions or nativ
Rod-
Wednesday, December 5, 2012, 7:15:50 AM, you wrote:
> directly. Are there any relatively simple extensions or native components
> that can be used or other workarounds?
No. There is no socket support, and no way to add it. We gave up on
LiveCode at work and went with Flex. Ugly, but it does
