Re: Project browser docs

PB is broken in a lot of ways, especially when it comes to handling groups. There are several bug reports about it that go back a ways. On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 11:26 AM J. Landman Gay via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > If you click the Layer header to view by layer order yo

Re: Project browser docs

If you click the Layer header to view by layer order you'll see what you're looking for. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com On December 6, 2021 7:10:29 AM Alex Tweedly via use-livecode wrote: Thanks Matthias - found it. I

Re: Project browser docs

Thanks Matthias - found it. It looks like it's not for me - I use too much nesting of groups and can't handle a non-hierarchical view:-) Alex. On 06/12/2021 13:01, matthias rebbe via use-livecode wrote: Before the Project Browser was introduced Application Overview was the tool to get an o

Re: Project browser docs

Before the Project Browser was introduced Application Overview was the tool to get an overview of all loaded stacks, its substacks, cards and all objects on that cards. You can now find it under Plugins->revApplicationOveriew. Regards, Matthias > Am 06.12.2021 um 13:49 schrieb Alex Tweedly via

Re: Project browser docs

On 06/12/2021 04:14, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode wrote: I prefer the horizontal layout in the Application Overview, but i thought I'd give the PB another try now that I'm working on a simpler project. It's too unweildy for multi-stack projects with lots of controls. Sorry, dumb question

Re: Project browser docs

I found a lesson on it but it doesn't say what the dotted outline around some cards means. A full explanation of the project browser should be in the user guide. I didn't think to check the lessons until today and newcomers may not even know the lessons exist. If the full documentation is too

Re: Project browser docs

So I take it there are no docs? -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com On December 4, 2021 3:03:35 PM "J. Landman Gay via use-livecode" wrote: Where is the documentation for the project browser? There's nothing in the User Gui

Re: Project Browser - refresh button still not available

On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:38 PM Mark Wieder via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > > Ha! The PB is a maintenance nightmare... you're looking at 12 mainstacks > plus a behavior stack or two, and some seemingly random stuff thrown in > for good measure... still haven't figured out

Re: Project Browser - refresh button still not available

On 09/05/2018 03:37 PM, Mark Wieder via use-livecode wrote: On 09/05/2018 02:53 PM, Tom Glod via use-livecode wrote: I think adding that to the PB code and interface could not be that difficult. What about doing it yourself ? Ha! The PB is a maintenance nightmare... you're looking at 12 mainst

Re: Project Browser - refresh button still not available

On 09/05/2018 02:53 PM, Tom Glod via use-livecode wrote: I think adding that to the PB code and interface could not be that difficult. What about doing it yourself ? Ha! The PB is a maintenance nightmare... you're looking at 12 mainstacks plus a behavior stack or two, and some seemingly random

Re: Project Browser - refresh button still not available

If i could do it, i would have done this already. > Am 05.09.2018 um 23:53 schrieb Tom Glod via use-livecode > : > > I think adding that to the PB code and interface could not be that > difficult. What about doing it yourself ? > > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 4:00 PM Matthias Rebbe via use-livecod

Re: Project Browser - refresh button still not available

I think adding that to the PB code and interface could not be that difficult. What about doing it yourself ? On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 4:00 PM Matthias Rebbe via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > Yes, it can be, but it is a shame. > > Matthias > > > > Am 05.09.2018 um 21:53 schr

Re: Project Browser - refresh button still not available

Yes, it can be, but it is a shame. Matthias > Am 05.09.2018 um 21:53 schrieb Bob Sneidar via use-livecode > : > >> On Sep 5, 2018, at 11:57 , Matthias Rebbe via use-livecode >> wrote: >> >> I know there is Navigator from Geoff Canyon which can be used as an >> replacement, but it can´t be

Re: Project Browser - refresh button still not available

> On Sep 5, 2018, at 11:57 , Matthias Rebbe via use-livecode > wrote: > > I know there is Navigator from Geoff Canyon which can be used as an > replacement, but it can´t be that one has to use a 3rd party plugin to get a > function the old deprecated RevApplicationBrowser already had. Oh, bu

Re: Project Browser Goes Blank - How To Refresh

On 04/07/2018 08:30 AM, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami via use-livecode wrote: 9.0 gm Project browser always goes "blank" it there keystroke to refresh it? Sometime it requires a reboot… will not refresh, even from the menu. revApplicationOverview , OTHO, always works… so I switch to that until I

Re: Project Browser Goes Blank - How To Refresh

Navigator..I have it… 5.5 alpha 1? Is that the latest? PB: It happened midst of "group whacking" But more often I close stack -- its blank after that. I shall try for recipe… Mike Kerner You could also use Navigator a) System b) What are you doing when it goes blank? I've had

Re: Project Browser Goes Blank - How To Refresh

You could also use Navigator a) System b) What are you doing when it goes blank? I've had it happen on a Mac when I'm in the midst of group whacking. On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami via use-livecode wrote: > 9.0 gm > > Project browser always goes "blank" > > it there

Re: Project Browser Allows you to move a group into another group

Good luck… I'm on mac On 9/14/16, 8:19 AM, "use-livecode on behalf of Paul Hibbert" wrote: I should be able to share it, the plugin was made to add some shortcuts to the menus, so I’ll need to do a little more testing with the latest release and a bit of code tidying along with some war

Re: Project Browser Allows you to move a group into another group

I should be able to share it, the plugin was made to add some shortcuts to the menus, so I’ll need to do a little more testing with the latest release and a bit of code tidying along with some warnings/instructions before it’s suitable for public use, but I’ll get on it then add it to the LiveCo

Re: Project Browser Allows you to move a group into another group

Paul Hibbert wrote: So I made a Plugin that allows me to refresh my PB. :) BR: Can you share this with us? ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription p

Re: Project Browser Allows you to move a group into another group

The Application Browser has always had a Refresh Icon just below the right hand side of the left pane, it’s only small and light grey, but it’s there. When I suggested a Refresh button for the Project Browser, MW didn’t think it was a good idea! So I made a Plugin that allows me to refresh my PB

Re: Project Browser Allows you to move a group into another group

The tiny refresh icon is on the left side under the stack list. Only it's not always so recognizable. Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com On September 13, 2016 7:37:37 AM Roger Eller wrote: Why h

Re: Project Browser Allows you to move a group into another group

I am not able to reproduce this, this morning after a fresh reboot of LC. If I create new stack, create two groups with multiple objects and move one group into the other group, I can move it out again in the PB… I can also relayer objects in the property inspector and "fresh just out of the box

Re: Project Browser Allows you to move a group into another group

Why hide it behind a right-click? A tiny recognisable refresh icon in plain sight would be better, IMHO. ~Roger On Sep 13, 2016 5:43 AM, "Ben Rubinstein" wrote: > On 13/09/2016 05:31, J. Landman Gay wrote: > >> On September 12, 2016 9:57:40 PM Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami < >> bra...@hindu.org>

Re: Project Browser Allows you to move a group into another group

On 13/09/2016 05:31, J. Landman Gay wrote: On September 12, 2016 9:57:40 PM Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami wrote: But both the Project Browser and RevApplicationbrowser do not reflect the change. Once in a while they do… but 80% of the time, change of layers are not reflected/updated. Is there a

Re: Project Browser Allows you to move a group into another group

On September 12, 2016 9:57:40 PM Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami wrote: But both the Project Browser and RevApplicationbrowser do not reflect the change. Once in a while they do… but 80% of the time, change of layers are not reflected/updated. Is there a way force refresh these lists? For the

Re: Project Browser Allows you to move a group into another group

> On 13 Sep 2016, at 12:56 PM, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami > wrote: > > also… if we change the layer of a group from the property inspector, eg. the > card has 32 layers of objects and you want to move a group on layer 19 to the > top. > > You can set the layer of group 19 to 35 (in the prope

Re: Project Browser Allows you to move a group into another group

also… if we change the layer of a group from the property inspector, eg. the card has 32 layers of objects and you want to move a group on layer 19 to the top. You can set the layer of group 19 to 35 (in the property inspector) and it actually moves to the top (you can see it on the card) and

Re: Project Browser Allows you to move a group into another group

I think you should be able to both relayer within the group and drag an object out of a group into its parent group or card so it sounds like there’s an issue there. > On 13 Sep 2016, at 12:08 PM, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami > wrote: > > the Project Browser is much improved an very stable now…

Re: Project Browser

Well, I apologise if I got that one wrong: about the Application Browser being EOL. I was not trying to distort reality, and I know I am not Steve Jobs, and am very glad I'm not: and there are 2 ways of interpreting "Kevin is not Steve Jobs", and I meant that to be a positive statement, not t

Re: Project Browser

Since the PB and the AB are both written in straight-up LC, why not try working on them? No LCB required. On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Kay C Lan wrote: > And Richmond you aren't Steve either, your distortion reality field > only extends to you. > > So no matter how often you try to complete

Re: Project Browser

And Richmond you aren't Steve either, your distortion reality field only extends to you. So no matter how often you try to completely distort reality, it isn't working. Your statement about LC EOLing the AB is a straight out misrepresentation of the facts which you are fully aware of because you p

Re: Project Browser

Well, Kevin Miller is not Steve Jobs. R. On 24.05.2016 22:16, J. Landman Gay wrote: The last time I led a revolt, Steve Jobs wrote me a terse email and shut down HC. But I can submit a bug report. On 5/24/2016 1:10 PM, RM wrote: Well, Jacque, do you want to lead a revolt (not quite sure if

Re: Project Browser

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:16 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > The last time I led a revolt, Steve Jobs wrote me a terse email and shut > down HC. > so YOU were the one! Stephen Barncard - Sebastopol Ca. USA - mixstream.org ___ use-livecode mailing list us

Re: Project Browser

J. Landman Gay writes: > > You're welcome. I had no idea I was such a powerful influence on The Steve. Now if you just had that influence over The Kevin... -- Mark Wieder ahsoftw...@gmail.com ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.ru

Re: Project Browser

You're welcome. I had no idea I was such a powerful influence on The Steve. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com On May 24, 2016 4:11:22 PM "Peter M. Brigham" wrote: On May 24, 2016, at 3:16 PM, J.

Re: Project Browser

Those were exactly my thoughts too! LOL! Bob S > On May 24, 2016, at 14:09 , Peter M. Brigham wrote: > > On May 24, 2016, at 3:16 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > >> The last time I led a revolt, Steve Jobs wrote me a terse email and shut >> down HC. > > My first impulse for a reply was "OMG, so

Re: Project Browser

Thanks so much that is what I am looking for! Bob S > On May 24, 2016, at 07:55 , Ben Rubinstein wrote: > > On 24/05/2016 15:44, Bob Sneidar wrote: >> Did someone say there was a way to get the application browser back? The >> project browser in it's current form is a bit unusable. A couple

Re: Project Browser

On May 24, 2016, at 3:16 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > The last time I led a revolt, Steve Jobs wrote me a terse email and shut down > HC. My first impulse for a reply was "OMG, so YOU were responsible for the death of Hypercard!?" Then I thought, but look what we have now -- LiveCode. So… thanks

Re: Project Browser

The last time I led a revolt, Steve Jobs wrote me a terse email and shut down HC. But I can submit a bug report. On 5/24/2016 1:10 PM, RM wrote: Well, Jacque, do you want to lead a revolt (not quite sure if that's the correct word) to bring back the Application Browser as something that hasn'

Re: Project Browser

Well, Jacque, do you want to lead a revolt (not quite sure if that's the correct word) to bring back the Application Browser as something that hasn't been EOL-ed and packed off into the Plug-ins folder to keep people like Thee and me 'happy'? Richmond. On 24.05.2016 21:05, J. Landman Gay wrote

Re: Project Browser

On May 24, 2016, at 9:28 AM, RM wrote: It isn't my cup of tea either. But for those of us who don't like it, the Application Browser is "still there", but, I assume, it is frozen, and in time may prove a bit "lumpy" with new versions of Livecode. It's getting lumpier with 8.0.1rc1. Double-cl

Re: Project Browser

Project browser issues have also kept me from using v8 for development. It has been especially frustrating when trying to reorder objects on cards with groups. Bill William Prothero http://es.earthednet.org > On May 24, 2016, at 9:28 AM, RM wrote: > > It isn't my cup of tea either. > > But fo

Re: Project Browser

It isn't my cup of tea either. But for those of us who don't like it, the Application Browser is "still there", but, I assume, it is frozen, and in time may prove a bit "lumpy" with new versions of Livecode. But by then, either the Project Browser will be better (and/or more like the Applicat

Re: Project Browser

On 24/05/2016 15:44, Bob Sneidar wrote: Did someone say there was a way to get the application browser back? The project browser in it's current form is a bit unusable. A couple times I attempted to drag-reorder the objects, and instead only succeeded at putting one object into another group.

Re: Project Browser in LC8

On 01/09/2015 10:03, Charles Warwick wrote: I’ve just been tracking down a bug in the LC8 project browser, and have noticed that the code for the project browser for LC8 is quite different to what used to be there in LC7. While I am happy to send through some fixes for the issues I have foun

Re: Project Browser... BAAAAD!

On Jan 16, 2015, at 8:28 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: > Bob Sneidar wrote: > > > On Jan 16, 2015, at 15:42 , Richard Gaskin wrote: > > > >> I don't believe the Project Browser contains any code for saving. > >> Are you using an auto-save plugin? > > > > No in fact I have gotten into the habit of us

Re: Project Browser... BAAAAD!

Bob Sneidar wrote: > On Jan 16, 2015, at 15:42 , Richard Gaskin wrote: > >> I don't believe the Project Browser contains any code for saving. >> Are you using an auto-save plugin? > > No in fact I have gotten into the habit of using precious few > plugins. All I have right now besides the default

Re: Project Browser... BAAAAD!

No in fact I have gotten into the habit of using precious few plugins. All I have right now besides the default plugins is Datagrid Helper and TMAlign. Bob S On Jan 16, 2015, at 15:42 , Richard Gaskin mailto:ambassa...@fourthworld.com>> wrote: Bob Sneidar wrote: > So hearing that I can drag

Re: Project Browser... BAAAAD!

Bob Sneidar wrote: > So hearing that I can drag reorder objects in the project browser > I thought I’d give it a try. I tried to drag a group up to another > position, but it deleted the whole group! No problem, I’ll just > revert to saved right? WRONG! Object still deleted! So I closed >

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

OHH EM GEE! I knew something that Jacque didn’t? Well that was fun, although short lived. ;-) Bob S > On Jan 7, 2015, at 14:03 , J. Landman Gay wrote: > > On 1/7/2015 3:02 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote: >> I’ve been using command-[ and ] to move controls up and down one at a >> time whilst watching w

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

On 1/7/2015 4:03 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: On 1/7/2015 3:02 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote: I’ve been using command-[ and ] to move controls up and down one at a time whilst watching where they end up in the App Browser. Well I'll be damned. I had no idea you could do that. I don't think I've ever seen

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

On 1/7/2015 3:02 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote: I’ve been using command-[ and ] to move controls up and down one at a time whilst watching where they end up in the App Browser. Well I'll be damned. I had no idea you could do that. I don't think I've ever seen a reference to that feature. Thanks! --

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

Really?? I’ve been using command-[ and ] to move controls up and down one at a time whilst watching where they end up in the App Browser. If I could drag and drop them that would make form gen much easier. Bob S On Jan 3, 2015, at 10:32 , J. Landman Gay mailto:jac...@hyperactivesw.com>> wrote

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Peter Haworth wrote: > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote: > > > Basically, the code can be licensed without any right to redistribute. > > > That's what I want to do! I think using the language I quoted in an earlier post (or was it the other thr

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote: > Basically, the code can be licensed without any right to redistribute. That's what I want to do! Pete lcSQL Software Home of lcStackBrowser and SQLiteAdmin

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: > Richard- > > Sunday, January 4, 2015, 5:21:36 PM, you wrote: > > > Once you've sold it, any open source license lets that person > redistribute > > freely. > > While I should know better than to argue legal matters with a lawyer... > You're wro

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

Pete- Monday, January 5, 2015, 10:23:45 AM, you wrote: > Thanks for that clear explanation Mark. Your method sounds like exactly > what I'm looking for. As far as the license, should I start by checking > out the Creative Commons license? For some reason unclear to me (IANAL) Creative Commons

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 12:44 AM, FlexibleLearning.com < ad...@flexiblelearning.com> wrote: > I think most folks are only interested in whether it actually works, > whether > it suits their workflow, and whether it does what they need. > I agree with that. My own personal approach to that is that

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

Thanks for that clear explanation Mark. Your method sounds like exactly what I'm looking for. As far as the license, should I start by checking out the Creative Commons license? Pete lcSQL Software Home of lcStackBrowser and SQLit

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

Like Bill, I faced the same issue with ControlManager. I also decided to release it as Community Compatible so it works on all versions of LiveCode and included a video... www.FlexibleLearning.com/controlmanager www.youtube.com/watch?v=QtrhtSXCsfk I think most folks are only interested in whethe

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

Richard- Sunday, January 4, 2015, 5:21:36 PM, you wrote: > Once you've sold it, any open source license lets that person redistribute > freely. While I should know better than to argue legal matters with a lawyer... You're wrong about that. The situation you're describing here and in your paper

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote: > Once you've sold it, any open source license lets that person redistribute > freely. > And that's the crux of the matter. No password protection = no hidden license key checking so I need a license that specifically prevents a user from givin

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Peter Haworth wrote: > > But I still need some sort of protection against someone simply copying > code out of it and inserting it into their own products, that's where it > gets hazy for me. If my license is "open source", does that mean they > would have to rele

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

Just to be clear, it was the developers who (rightfully) requested that the password code be removed. We couldn't sell secure products or create them for our clients if the world knew how to bypass code protection. On January 4, 2015 6:10:11 PM CST, Kay C Lan wrote: > >So nothing to do with th

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Peter Haworth wrote: > > Community Edition can't load password protected stacks because that would > break the rules of open source, That is not my understanding of the situation. There is no reason why an OSS liscensed app can't interact with Closed Source Softw

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

Hi Bernard, Community Edition can't load password protected stacks because that would break the rules of open source, so the password encryption/decryption routines are not compiled into the Community Edition. I believe that is the only functional difference between the Community Edition and the C

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

by "confused though by this statement: " I mean "confused by the statement below quoted by me". On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Bernard Devlin wrote: > Hi Peter, > > I've never looked at your product (but following this discussion, I think > I must). > > I'm confused though by this statement: C

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

Hi Peter, I've never looked at your product (but following this discussion, I think I must). I'm confused though by this statement: Can't the Community Edition users just use the paid version of your tool? Isn't the only difference with LC "editions" that the CE cannot create password-protected

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

Thanks for this explanation, just demonstrates how little I know about licensing in the open source world! I get what you're saying about lcStackbrowser - it doesn't persist beyond the development stage and none of its code is added to whatever executable is created using it. But I still need som

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

Thanks for the input Bill. I think it would be hard for me to sell lcStackBrowser on the basis of video/screenshots, although I do have some old videos of the product in use. It has so many features and functionality that the video would be too long or I'd have to come up with fairly large number

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Peter Haworth wrote: > Nothing I can do about the latter but any help in finding a dual license > template would be most welcome. Plus, how can I ensure people agree to the > license terms since they can easily disable whatever code I put in there to > display it?

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

I faced this same dilemma with lcTaskList. I had many great people on this list encourage me to not sweat my coding insecurities. It is what it is and if it works no one cares. You are correct in that there is no way to protect your code if it is unlocked. You either release a feature reduced ver

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

On 1/3/2015 11:08 PM, Kay C Lan wrote: wife - "where are the kids?" me - "Oh they've scrolled off again!" --meaning to depart with out reference to where they are going Okay, I laughed. :) -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | ht

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 2:31 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > because the card and stack references have scrolled off. > > Another +1 for what Jacque wrote. Completely OT but I've decided I like the term 'scrolled off' and will be using it from now on. wife - "where are the kids?" me - "Oh they've sc

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: > That would be awesome. It's much better than the AB or the PB. > It's kind of like the best parts of both, and then still better than > that. > To be honest, the only things holding me back are finding a good simple dual license and embarrassm

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

Pete- Saturday, January 3, 2015, 9:45:20 AM, you wrote: > I'm getting more inclined to make lcStackBrowser dual-licensed. I'll still > charge for it but there won't be a demo, just a 30-day money back guarantee. That would be awesome. It's much better than the AB or the PB. It's kind of like th

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

lcStackBrowser has many of the functions mentioned in this thread. Drag/drop relayering (and moving and copying), alignment tools without the need to open an Inspector palette and single click access to behavior scripts (including chained behaviors). It also has a bunch of navigation features that

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

On 1/3/2015 10:49 AM, Paul Hibbert wrote: I like the Alignment tools and especially the Behaviour badges in the PB and would love to see something like that in the AB, but that's about the only thing I have found it useful for, sorry RR! My client, who does much of the layout on our stacks, use

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

I'm getting more inclined to make lcStackBrowser dual-licensed. I'll still charge for it but there won't be a demo, just a 30-day money back guarantee. Pete lcSQL Software Home of lcStackBrowser and SQLiteAdmin

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

Richard- Friday, January 2, 2015, 10:31:12 PM, Jacque wrote: > I feel like a curmudgeon after writing what follows, but...I don't use > the project browser because it's too slow and cumbersome for my project. What Jacque said. That and all the rest. I'd use Pete's lcStackBrowser if it worked wit

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

I'm with Jacque & Doc on this too. I rarely use the Project Browser because I have had problems with the IDE slowing down way too much, also using the Message Watcher with the Project Browser open is a nightmare. The Application Browser usually updates when you modify a control, but the Projec

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: > Can you recall offhand what sorts of tasks take you more steps in the > Project Browser? > What Jacque wrote. All I have to add to that is the extra click just to open the list of substacks. And then, as she mentions, the extra scrolling

Re: Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

On 1/2/2015 9:00 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: Can you recall offhand what sorts of tasks take you more steps in the Project Browser? I feel like a curmudgeon after writing what follows, but...I don't use the project browser because it's too slow and cumbersome for my project. It may be useful f