Very creative approach. I like it.
-= Mike
On Sep 24, 2014, at 12:30 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
> Jacqueline
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
On 9/24/2014, 2:20 AM, la...@significantplanet.org wrote:
I am using a for each loop and have run some benchmark time tests. I am
able to find (match) the words I want in about 1/7 of the time that it
used to take me using a different procedure - and the old way was pretty
fast! To find all the
ithin 30 chars. With the old way, I
couldn't even search on more than 12 chars, because it just took too long.
So I learned a lot today!
Larry
P.S. Yes, I am using arrays.
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 9:10 PM
Subject: Re: P.S. on searching
Larry.
Just read your brute force comment. Not sure how much data you want to compare,
but a loop using the "for each" variant will run an awful lot of text in an
awfully short time.
What about that array thing, just for modernity and compactness/
Craig
-Original Message-
From: l
