And again. I really could not count the number of times over the years that the
good people of this list have dug me out of a LiveCode hole, usually (but not
always) of my own making. I literally could not use LiveCode now without
knowing the list is there as the first-aid line. One cannot alway
> . I continue to be amazed and thankful for the warm spirit of helpfulness and
> friendliness in this community, freely given.
>
Me too. Nicely put.
David Glasgow
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url t
Hello Christer.
This list is a community. It is friendly, helpful, and there is a certain
amount of chat. When that chat becomes excessive, I do ask members to curtail
it, however nothing in this thread in any way contravenes the spirit of this
list. You were offered some helpful advice. Anothe
Just to respond.
Thank you for the advices - very helpful. However, experiences with the early
versions (say V5-V7) made me avoid the grouping functionality. Maybe because I
could not manage the concept too well. So I have given it up and manage it (as
do with scaling etc) with additional co
On 1/8/18 2:07 PM, Mark Wieder via use-livecode wrote:
I have a similar problem with my yahoo account, and gmail isn't much
help either. Maybe even worse, since gmail insists on not respecting
folders.
I have gMail forward all incoming mail to my hyperactivesw address,
where I read it on my M
On 01/08/2018 10:51 AM, dunbarx via use-livecode wrote:
I do get a lot of eye rolling about that. Stuck in the past, you see.
Heh.
Yeah, but what I had in mind is that aol's email access doesn't handle
things like threading, so their technology (or rather their not keeping
up to date with it
I do get a lot of eye rolling about that. Stuck in the past, you see.
Craig
--
Sent from:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Revolution-User-f278306.html
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url t
Jacque-
Remember that Craig is still using aol.
Nuff said.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
htt
Jacque.
I do receive them as emails, but the text is not well formed, and the thread
is not preserved. So I go to babble to get the context and timing.
It would all be fine if we signed our names.
Craig
--
Sent from:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Revolution-User-f278306.html
It works if you receive the list in email, only the nabble archives do that
(and maybe some others.) The last person to post is assigned to all posts
in the archive. It can change minute to minute.
Also, when replying to the list from an email client you may need to adjust
your reply settings,
Klaus.
I never can figure out who the authors of these posts are. It seems that
each day one user garners all of them. I have no idea how that is managed.
With--over at midnight GMT?
I asked years ago that everyone sign their full names because the list
structure itself is useless.
Craig Newman
Hi Craig,
> Am 07.01.2018 um 18:13 schrieb dunbarx via use-livecode
> :
>
> "I have experienced that ungrouping may send the individual objects to random
> layers. "
>
> First, what Klaus said.
>
> Second, layer order is preserved pretty well in LC. When you set the layer
> of the group to top
"I have experienced that ungrouping may send the individual objects to random
layers. "
First, what Klaus said.
Second, layer order is preserved pretty well in LC. When you set the layer
of the group to top, as Kluas suggests, and then ungroup, all the child
controls take the topmost layers, with
What if you set the layer of the group to top before ungrouping?
set the layer of grp "playerGroup" to top
ungroup grp "playerGroup"
But, why do you need to ungroup?
randy
-
> On Jan 7, 2018, at 9:32 AM, Pyyhtiä Christer via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> When setting object layers, how do t
14 matches
Mail list logo
