Re: Need suggestions: very start of a stack revision system.

Mark Wieder wrote: Richard- Wednesday, September 19, 2012, 7:26:14 PM, you wrote: I just updated the Rev Interop page at lcj to reflect the URL to the new forum: "please joing the RIP Yahoo Group" ? Fixed - now reads "please join the foru

Re: Need suggestions: very start of a stack revision system.

On 9/19/12 9:18 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: Richard- Wednesday, September 19, 2012, 7:26:14 PM, you wrote: I just updated the Rev Interop page at lcj to reflect the URL to the new forum: "please joing the RIP Yahoo Group" ? I don't see the poble

Re: Need suggestions: very start of a stack revision system.

Richard- Wednesday, September 19, 2012, 7:26:14 PM, you wrote: > I just updated the Rev Interop page at lcj to reflect the URL to the new > forum: > "please joing the RIP Yahoo Group" ? -- -Mark Wieder mwie...@ahsoftware.net ___

Re: Need suggestions: very start of a stack revision system.

Mark Wieder wrote: > ...and I suppose you realize that there's no link to the forum > anywhere on livecodejournal.com - you have to type it in. And > worse, you have to know it exists in order to find it and do that. That's a security feature. ;) I just updated the Rev Interop page at lcj to re

Re: Need suggestions: very start of a stack revision system.

I noticed that, but I just bookmarked it. Pete lcSQL Software On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: > ...and I suppose you realize that there's no link to the forum > anywhere on livecodejournal.com - you have to type it in. And worse, > you have to know it

Re: Need suggestions: very start of a stack revision system.

...and I suppose you realize that there's no link to the forum anywhere on livecodejournal.com - you have to type it in. And worse, you have to know it exists in order to find it and do that. -- -Mark Wieder mwie...@ahsoftware.net ___ use-livecode ma

Re: Need suggestions: very start of a stack revision system.

Pete- Wednesday, September 19, 2012, 4:27:07 PM, you wrote: > Thanks Richard, just saw the activation email. Yep. Mine came through as well. -- -Mark Wieder mwie...@ahsoftware.net ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please

Re: Need suggestions: very start of a stack revision system.

Thanks Richard, just saw the activation email. Pete lcSQL Software On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: > Thanks for the note. > > Peter, Jacque, and Mark Wieder were in queue as "Inactive" - just fixed > that. > > -- > Richard Gaskin > Fourth World >

Re: Need suggestions: very start of a stack revision system.

Thanks for the note. Peter, Jacque, and Mark Wieder were in queue as "Inactive" - just fixed that. -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World LiveCode training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com Webzine for LiveCode developers: http://www.LiveCodeJournal.com Follow me on Twitter: http://twit

Re: Need suggestions: very start of a stack revision system.

Richard Gaskin writes: > I'm not sure how PHPBB sends notifications for such things, but I > approved your account yesterday. I realize you've got other things to deal with, but... "The specified username is currently inactive. If you have problems activating your account, please contact a boa

Re: Need suggestions: very start of a stack revision system.

Try flushing the browser cache and trying again. On Sep 19, 2012, at 9:30 AM, Peter Haworth wrote: > Richard, > Great that this repository is available. I just tried registering and am > stuck on the captcha codes. I got it wrong on the first attempt and got an > error to that effect. On ever

Re: Need suggestions: very start of a stack revision system.

Richard, Great that this repository is available. I just tried registering and am stuck on the captcha codes. I got it wrong on the first attempt and got an error to that effect. On every subsequent attempt, I was presented with a new code but no error message. I have to say I am not a big fan

Re: Need suggestions: very start of a stack revision system.

Mark Wieder wrote: Since I haven't yet gotten my authorization to post on the board, let me say here that I'm already using the uRIP["project"] in glx2 for version control. That may be the best place for it - good idea. Please do post that in the forum thread:

Re: Need suggestions: very start of a stack revision system.

There's my new Available message! On Sep 19, 2012, at 4:21 AM, Peter M. Brigham wrote: > Analyzing humor is like dissecting a frog: nobody is interested, and the frog > dies. ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit th

Re: Need suggestions: very start of a stack revision system.

On Sep 18, 2012, at 2:01 PM, Mike Bonner wrote: > Get it? Too ugly for U. No U. Oo. Oogly. HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR *cough* Sorry > it got away from me there for a sec. Analyzing humor is like dissecting a frog: nobody is interested, and the frog dies.:-) -- Peter Peter M. Brigham pmb...@gmail.

Re: Need suggestions: very start of a stack revision system.

Richard- Since I haven't yet gotten my authorization to post on the board, let me say here that I'm already using the uRIP["project"] in glx2 for version control. Is the old revInterOp yahoo group now defunct? -- -Mark Wieder mwie...@ahsoftware.net ___

Re: Need suggestions: very start of a stack revision system.

With the growing number of tools that can be useful across a collection of stacks that may comprise an application, I finally got around to kicking off a discussion at the Rev Interoperability Project forum with a proposal for the community to define a Project Definition spec. As I see it at t

Re: Need suggestions: very start of a stack revision system.

Get it? Too ugly for U. No U. Oo. Oogly. HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR *cough* Sorry it got away from me there for a sec. On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Klaus on-rev wrote: > > Am 18.09.2012 um 19:54 schrieb Mike Bonner : > > > To Ugly for U. > > 2 ugly 4 u :-) > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Bo

Re: Need suggestions: very start of a stack revision system.

Am 18.09.2012 um 19:54 schrieb Mike Bonner : > To Ugly for U. 2 ugly 4 u :-) > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Bob Sneidar wrote: > >> Ugly and also gooey. >> >> On Sep 17, 2012, at 6:21 PM, Peter Haworth wrote: >> >>> "oogly" ___ use-livec

Re: Need suggestions: very start of a stack revision system.

To Ugly for U. On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Bob Sneidar wrote: > Ugly and also gooey. > > On Sep 17, 2012, at 6:21 PM, Peter Haworth wrote: > > > "oogly" > > > ___ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this

Re: Need suggestions: very start of a stack revision system.

Ugly and also gooey. On Sep 17, 2012, at 6:21 PM, Peter Haworth wrote: > "oogly" ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.r

Re: Need suggestions: very start of a stack revision system.

No problem Mike, it's not password protected for that reason. Pete lcSQL Software On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Mike Bonner wrote: > Thanks very much for the revIDEHandleObjectDeleted pointer. Do you mind if > I look at your frontscript to see how you did some thing?

Re: Need suggestions: very start of a stack revision system.

Thanks very much for the revIDEHandleObjectDeleted pointer. Do you mind if I look at your frontscript to see how you did some thing? Just downloaded the trial and can see that script but don't want to start digging without your ok. And yes, my code is bagworthy. Possibly a doublebagger. __

Re: Need suggestions: very start of a stack revision system.

Sounds interesting Mike. One thing to watch out for, as I found out with my lcStackBrowser plugin, if a stack is "closed and removed from memory", you don;t get a closeStack message because apparently the IDE locks messages when handling that function. Don't remember who it was that revealed that