Re: Naive Response 666

On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Pete wrote: > Glad the licenses are in there now but, like a previous poster, I can't > open > any of the stacks. LC starts up when I click on them but the Application > Browser shows no open stacks. This is with LC 4.6, OSX 10.6.7. Since the stacks are pref

Re: Naive Response 666

On 06/04/2011 09:25 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: Richmond- Saturday, June 4, 2011, 11:00:36 AM, you wrote: Hey, it isn't the first time I've been used as the whipping boy; I'm kinda used to it . . . :) Good to know. I'll keep that in mind next time I'm looking for a likely victim. Hey; just ima

Re: Naive Response 666

Richmond- Saturday, June 4, 2011, 11:00:36 AM, you wrote: > Hey, it isn't the first time I've been used as the whipping boy; I'm > kinda used to it . . . :) Good to know. I'll keep that in mind next time I'm looking for a likely victim. -- -Mark Wieder mwie...@ahsoftware.net __

Re: Naive Response 666

On 06/04/2011 09:07 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: Pete wrote: Glad the licenses are in there now but, like a previous poster, I can't open any of the stacks. LC starts up when I click on them but the Application Browser shows no open stacks. This is with LC 4.6, OSX 10.6.7. Pete Molly's Revenge

Re: Naive Response 666

Pete wrote: Glad the licenses are in there now but, like a previous poster, I can't open any of the stacks. LC starts up when I click on them but the Application Browser shows no open stacks. This is with LC 4.6, OSX 10.6.7. Pete Molly's Revenge Same here. Read

Re: Naive Response 666

On 06/04/2011 08:56 PM, Pete wrote: Glad the licenses are in there now but, like a previous poster, I can't open any of the stacks. LC starts up when I click on them but the Application Browser shows no open stacks. This is with LC 4.6, OSX 10.6.7. Pete Molly's Revenge

Re: Naive Response 666

On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Jan Schenkel wrote: > Hi Roger, > > You are correct that I could (and should) have more carefully chosen my > words. In my ten years on this list, I've hardly ever taken up a flamethrower > to burn someone to a crisp. And I certainly don't want to make it a habit. >

Re: Naive Response 666

On 06/04/2011 08:44 PM, Jan Schenkel wrote: --- On Sat, 6/4/11, Roger Eller wrote: On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Jan Schenkel wrote: The fact that it is 'some sort of GNU license' doesn't mean that you're free to do as you please and 'steal' them for your own collections. I find it appa

Re: Naive Response 666

On 06/04/2011 08:20 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: Roger- Saturday, June 4, 2011, 10:04:34 AM, you wrote: Public flogging always helps matters. An off-list FYI might me more appropriate and considerate. Yes, but... it's a good point for all of us to keep in mind. If this were just a private email to

Re: Naive Response 666

Glad the licenses are in there now but, like a previous poster, I can't open any of the stacks. LC starts up when I click on them but the Application Browser shows no open stacks. This is with LC 4.6, OSX 10.6.7. Pete Molly's Revenge On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 10:20

Re: Naive Response 666

--- On Sat, 6/4/11, Roger Eller wrote: > On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Jan > Schenkel wrote: > > The fact that it is 'some sort of GNU license' doesn't > mean that you're free > > to do as you please and 'steal' them for your own > collections. > > > > I find it appalling ... flame ... flame ..

Re: Naive Response 666

Roger- Saturday, June 4, 2011, 10:04:34 AM, you wrote: > Public flogging always helps matters. An off-list FYI might me more > appropriate and considerate. Yes, but... it's a good point for all of us to keep in mind. If this were just a private email to Richmond then we'd have to go through thi

Re: Naive Response 666

On 06/04/2011 08:06 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: Richmond- Saturday, June 4, 2011, 10:02:40 AM, you wrote: Right! I stand corrected and will put the licenses from the original files into the zip file. Do post when you've got the new one uploaded. That's quite a nice collection. Thanks for making it

Re: Naive Response 666

On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Richmond Mathewson wrote: > Right! I stand corrected and will put the licenses from the original files > into the zip file. > > This was something I completely overlooked. Thank you for putting me right. Good job dude! I look forward to downloading the volume with

Re: Naive Response 666

Richmond- Saturday, June 4, 2011, 10:02:40 AM, you wrote: > Right! I stand corrected and will put the licenses from the original > files into the zip file. Do post when you've got the new one uploaded. That's quite a nice collection. Thanks for making it available in a usable form. -- -Mark Wi

Re: Naive Response 666

On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Jan Schenkel wrote: > The fact that it is 'some sort of GNU license' doesn't mean that you're free > to do as you please and 'steal' them for your own collections. > > I find it appalling ... flame ... flame ... > > Shame on you, Richmond! > > Jan Schenkel. > [Adver

Re: Naive Response 666

On 06/04/2011 07:50 PM, Jan Schenkel wrote: --- On Sat, 6/4/11, Richmond Mathewson wrote: I've just uploaded a 7.1 MB zip file filled with various Open-Source stuff including 3 Gnome colour sets as Livecode Libraries: http://andregarzia.on-rev.com/richmond/revLibs/imageLibs.zip all of these a

Re: Naive Response 666

--- On Sat, 6/4/11, Richmond Mathewson wrote: > I've just uploaded a 7.1 MB zip file > filled with various Open-Source stuff including 3 Gnome > colour > sets as Livecode Libraries: > > http://andregarzia.on-rev.com/richmond/revLibs/imageLibs.zip > > all of these are covered by some sort of GNU

Re: Naive Response 666

On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Richmond Mathewson wrote: > > I've just uploaded a 7.1 MB zip file filled with various Open-Source stuff > including 3 Gnome colour > sets as Livecode Libraries: > > http://andregarzia.on-rev.com/richmond/revLibs/imageLibs.zip > > all of these are covered by some s