On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 4:28 AM, Richmond wrote:
> As someone pointed out a while back, 6.1.1 is still Beta quality.
I would have to disagree with that.
Beta means that things work and are ready to be tested for bugs, which are
expected.
Alpha means that it runs, but may not work.
5.5 is Beta
On 09/29/2013 11:32 AM, Monte Goulding wrote:
On 29/09/2013, at 6:07 PM, Richmond wrote:
Therefore I should like to propose that releases such as 6.1.1, even when they
have passed
thorough dp and rc phases should carry a 'B' at the end.
What's the B for? I'm not sure I understand the problem
On 29/09/2013, at 6:07 PM, Richmond wrote:
> Therefore I should like to propose that releases such as 6.1.1, even when
> they have passed
> thorough dp and rc phases should carry a 'B' at the end.
What's the B for? I'm not sure I understand the problem.
A bug is reported against a version and
