"nothing is stopping you from developing with LC versions prior to 9"
indeed: I'm refactoring, recoding, rejigging and generally have a "fun
time" moving my Devawriter Pro
from LiveCode 4.5 (which is seriously long in the tooth) to 8.1.1
and, as long as I can get the thing to work on Windows 1
Honestly though, nothing is stopping you from developing with LC versions prior
to 9. If you use script only stacks for your code libraries, it should be
fairly easy to conditionally branch for any new features you might want to make
available which older versions do not support. And if you say
:-)
Bob S
On Nov 20, 2016, at 04:34 , Richmond
mailto:richmondmathew...@gmail.com>> wrote:
as the cheapest iMac on the European market currently retails at 1,250 Euros
[ http://www.apple.com/de/shop/buy-mac/imac ]
and runs an OS (10.11 ~ 10.12) that has a GUI I just do not like
(Steve Jobs d
"LiveCode 9 may still run on OS X 10.7, for the time being"
It does, cheers, cheers!
Having just invested 190 Euros in a 2006 Intel iMac (max OS 10.7) I am
extremely
happy about this.
Personally I couldn't care less about "Official Support": if I make a
c*ck up I'll take the
responsibility.
On 19/11/2016 15:13, Richmond wrote:
I would like to know why Livecode 9 has dropped support for all versions
of Mac OS before 10.9.
LiveCode 9 may still run on OS X 10.7, for the time being -- we just
don't provide any official support for (or run tests on) that platform
any more.
The de
Richmond wrote:
> I would like to know why Livecode 9 has dropped support for all
> versions of Mac OS before 10.9.
ZDNet reports that OS X 10.8 t hasn't received critical security patches
in over four years, and as such is regarded as too dangerous to use:
OS X Mountain Lion: Still unsupp
