On 2/5/15 6:51 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Phil Davis wrote:
I upgraded my DH/LC server to 7.0 and am finding I can't use "do" in my
scripts. Is that your experience? For me it causes a SIGIOT error in the
HTTP error log and no further output to the browser (or your client of
choice).
Maybe this
Phil Davis wrote:
I upgraded my DH/LC server to 7.0 and am finding I can't use "do" in my
scripts. Is that your experience? For me it causes a SIGIOT error in the
HTTP error log and no further output to the browser (or your client of
choice).
Maybe this is noted in the release docs - dunno.
It
Warren Samples wrote:
On 11/11/2014 12:42 PM, Phil Davis wrote:
One thing I noticed is that script execution speed seems to have gotten
dreadfully slow in 64-bit 7.0 - roughly 6x slower.
I have a simple script that repeats 5000 times, adding to a counter and
populating and sorting a list with
On 11/11/2014 12:42 PM, Phil Davis wrote:
One thing I noticed is that script execution speed seems to have gotten
dreadfully slow in 64-bit 7.0 - roughly 6x slower.
I have a simple script that repeats 5000 times, adding to a counter and
populating and sorting a list with seven items. It takes
One thing I noticed is that script execution speed seems to have gotten
dreadfully slow in 64-bit 7.0 - roughly 6x slower. I ran "door-to-door"
timings from a desktop stack against the same script on two different
servers, the DH server running 7.0.0 and the on-rev server running
6.1.0. While o
Stephen
Do you know if Dreamhost upgraded to a newer version of Apache when they went
to 64-bit. The .htaccess directives syntax may have changed.
Peter
> On 11 Nov 2014, at 14:37, stephen barncard
> wrote:
>
> So the 64 bit version of Livecode Server works now, on my Livecode only
> sites.
So the 64 bit version of Livecode Server works now, on my Livecode only
sites.
I'm still having problems with having PHP and LIVECODE being available at
the same time with DH on Ubuntu.
surely there must be some way to get old htaccess directives to work to
retain the PHP.
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014
> On 11.11.2014, at 00:14, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>
> Is that a bug or a feature?
>
> One of the reasons I almost never use "do" is we have to be very careful in
> server environment to insulate it from inputs, lest it become a nasty
> injection exposure.
In view of this I would say this is
Thanks Ralf! I didn't know that. That explains my experience.
Phil
On 11/10/14 2:43 PM, Ralf Bitter wrote:
The do command does not work outside of a handler context.
This applies currently to version 7.0 only.
Ralf
On 10.11.2014, at 20:30, Phil Davis wrote:
Hi Richard, Stephen, all,
I
Ralf Bitter wrote:
The do command does not work outside of a handler context.
This applies currently to version 7.0 only.
Is that a bug or a feature?
One of the reasons I almost never use "do" is we have to be very careful
in server environment to insulate it from inputs, lest it become a nas
The do command does not work outside of a handler context.
This applies currently to version 7.0 only.
Ralf
> On 10.11.2014, at 20:30, Phil Davis wrote:
>
> Hi Richard, Stephen, all,
>
> I upgraded my DH/LC server to 7.0 and am finding I can't use "do" in my
> scripts. Is that your experie
Phil Davis wrote:
'do' works as expected in the desktop build.
While it's not impossible that the Server-specific stuff have may have
introduced a regression for "do", it seems less likely than something in
the command being done is having a problem with the server
configuration.
Can you
On 11/10/14 11:54 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Phil Davis wrote:
I upgraded my DH/LC server to 7.0 and am finding I can't use "do" in
my scripts. Is that your experience? For me it causes a SIGIOT error
in the HTTP error log and no further output to the browser (or your
client of choice).
I alm
Phil Davis wrote:
I upgraded my DH/LC server to 7.0 and am finding I can't use "do" in
my scripts. Is that your experience? For me it causes a SIGIOT error
in the HTTP error log and no further output to the browser (or your
client of choice).
I almost never use "do" so I haven't had a chance t
Hi Richard, Stephen, all,
I upgraded my DH/LC server to 7.0 and am finding I can't use "do" in my
scripts. Is that your experience? For me it causes a SIGIOT error in the
HTTP error log and no further output to the browser (or your client of
choice).
Maybe this is noted in the release docs -
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Richard Gaskin
wrote:
> Changing our LiveCode servers from earlier versions to v7 64-bit resolved
> the issue.
>
> This has been successful with both LiveCode Server and with Linux
> standalones made with LiveCode.
>
I hadn't thought about that... explains the us
stephen barncard wrote:
> Dreamhost has suddenly decided to 'upgrade' its OS to UBUNTU.
>
> So all of my sites that use Livecode server now fail with an error.
In the notice Dreamhost has been emailing to its customers about the
Ubuntu upgrade I believe it notes that the new version is now 64-b
What error? My first question would be, did they upgrade to 64 bit? If
so, you'd either need the 64 bit livecode server, or request that they
install the 32 bit libraries. (IA32 or something like that. Its been a
while)
What error?
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Matthias Rebbe | M-R-D <
mat
Stephan,
i am not completely sure, but shouldn´t it be .php, .htm and .html instead of
just php, html and html in the addHandler for php5?
But as i said, i am not sure if this is the reason for your problems.
Matthias
> Am 10.11.2014 um 09:07 schrieb stephen barncard
> :
>
> Dreamhost has su
19 matches
Mail list logo
