Re: LC 9.6.5 RC 2 Speed Test

2021-11-05 Thread Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode
Mark: > Is there any chance you can package up the files used to test > along with the stack and submit as an issue to BZ? > That way we can take a look to see what is causing > the significant differences with C and E, in particular? Here it is! I just posted the set of test files (and r

Re: LC 9.6.5 RC 2 Speed Test

2021-11-05 Thread Mark Waddingham via use-livecode
On 2021-11-05 12:32, Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode wrote: Absolutely; thanks! I'll do that within the next few days. (Should I use the old speed bug 21561 or a new one?) If you just add it as another example stack to Bug 21561 that would be fine - there's a good chance its multiple actual

Re: LC 9.6.5 RC 2 Speed Test

2021-11-05 Thread Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode
Mark: > Is there any chance you can package up the files used to test > along with the stack and submit as an issue to BZ? > That way we can take a look to see what is causing > the significant differences with C and E, in particular? Absolutely; thanks! I'll do that within the next few days. (

Re: LC 9.6.5 RC 2 Speed Test

2021-11-05 Thread Mark Waddingham via use-livecode
On 2021-11-05 11:05, Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode wrote: My first LC 9.6.5 RC 2 Speed Test - Results on Windows 10, current WordLib Ratings: - LC 9.6.5 RC 2 vs LC 9.6.3: 5 Wins, 0 Losses - LC 9.6.5 RC 2 vs LC 6.7.11: 2 Wins, 3 Losses Conclusion: Good progress; if we follow up on thes