jbv wrote:
> Is it me or is LC9 server much faster than previous versions ?
A great many areas are measurably faster, some even noticeably faster.
v7 was a transitional series, necessary for Unicode along with other
deep revisions. As a first pass at such a broad scope of changes, many
optim
I think LC9 is faster, but I've never tested, so that's purely "anecdotal".
Yes, I believe it does mean that a new stable release will replace the
older one; I've quoted Robin's mail from my support ticket conversation
below ...
This might be worth a discussion with on-rev support, to see whe
Hi Alex,
Thanks for the tip. I'm on sage too.
Is it me or is LC9 server much faster than previous versions ?
One more thing : you wrote :
"any file with extension .lc9 will use the latest stable release of LC9"
Does that mean that LC server will be updated every time a new stable
version is releas
I sent a support request asking for it :-)
AFAIK, at least on sage, it is installed systemwide - so any file with
extension .lc9 will use the latest stable release of LC9 (this is a
similar scheme to what HostM use).
I suspect you can use .htaccess to ensure it is used for all .lc files,
but
How do you run LC9 server on on-rev ?
Thanks.
On Thu, August 9, 2018 1:40 am, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode wrote:
> Oops - sent before I meant to ...
>
>
> With LC7 server on on-rev, I get
>
>
> 4141 5378 18699 28365 41200 50230 58901 62983 63416 65984 71574 73426
> 74288 112360 115826 121386 12
Alex Tweedly wrote:
> With LC7 server on on-rev, I get
>
> 4141 5378 18699 28365 41200 50230 58901 62983 63416 65984 71574 73426
> 74288 112360 115826 121386 126039 141224
>
> while with LC9 server on on-rev I get
>
> 4141
Looks like a bug got fixed:
https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=
Oops - sent before I meant to ...
With LC7 server on on-rev, I get
4141 5378 18699 28365 41200 50230 58901 62983 63416 65984 71574 73426
74288 112360 115826 121386 126039 141224
while with LC9 server on on-rev I get
4141
-- Alex.
On 08/08/2018 23:19, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode wrote:
Which versions of LC are you running in each case ?
Alex.
On 08/08/2018 22:29, jbv via use-livecode wrote:
Hi list,
As the title says, I am getting different results when running the script
below with LC desktop and LC server (on-rev account)...
The result is fine on desktop, but flawed on ser
