Re: IDE 'Reset'

2011-05-13 Thread Mark Wieder
Mark- Thursday, May 12, 2011, 3:45:51 PM, you wrote: > Non members are supposed to write a bug report to support > directly. RunRev will file the report in bugzilla for you. That is > my memory on the change. from Kevin 19 Nov 2010: - New customers will be presented with information telling t

Re: IDE 'Reset'

2011-05-12 Thread Mark Talluto
Non members are supposed to write a bug report to support directly. RunRev will file the report in bugzilla for you. That is my memory on the change. Best regards, Mark Talluto http://www.canelasoftware.com On May 12, 2011, at 3:20 PM, David Glass wrote: > I sent customer service an email

Re: IDE 'Reset'

2011-05-12 Thread David Glass
I sent customer service an email asking how to get access, and that was the response I received. Dear David Glass, Thank you for your request. To access the Quality Center you need to have a LiveCode Developer membership. You can read more about this here: http://www.runrev.com/products/livec

Re: IDE 'Reset'

2011-05-12 Thread Mark Wieder
David- Thursday, May 12, 2011, 9:25:45 AM, you wrote: > Just for completeness (and the archives), they've restricted access to > this to those users with Developer Program ($199/year) memberships. No, that was the original (and misguided) approach but it was changed before rolling out the new RQ

Re: IDE 'Reset'

2011-05-12 Thread David Glass
Just for completeness (and the archives), they've restricted access to this to those users with Developer Program ($199/year) memberships. On 05/11/2011 8:47 AM, Mark Wieder wrote: David- Wednesday, May 11, 2011, 8:02:52 AM, you wrote: How do I get access to this? E-mail customer service di

Re: IDE 'Reset'

2011-05-11 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 5/11/11 10:22 AM, David Glass wrote: Yes, there's nothing 'dangerous' or license-violating about it, but it seems analogous to writing the same block of code a bunch of times when a loop would be better. And it isn't really extensible. How many duplicates is enough? Almost guaranteed it's goi

Re: IDE 'Reset'

2011-05-11 Thread Richard Gaskin
David Glass wrote: Yes, there's nothing 'dangerous' or license-violating about it, but it seems analogous to writing the same block of code a bunch of times when a loop would be better. Or quite possibly the other way around. Think about all of the things that would need to be taken into acc

Re: IDE 'Reset'

2011-05-11 Thread Mark Wieder
David- Wednesday, May 11, 2011, 8:02:52 AM, you wrote: > How do I get access to this? E-mail customer service directly? Er... I think so. I don't remember the new procedure, but I think that's right. -- -Mark Wieder mwie...@ahsoftware.net ___ use

Re: IDE 'Reset'

2011-05-11 Thread David Glass
Joined. Thanks for the link On 05/11/2011 6:50 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote: The Rev Interoperability Project has more than a hundred members, many of whom contribute ideas and code for the benefit of the community as a whole. Membership is open to all who are interested:

Re: IDE 'Reset'

2011-05-11 Thread David Glass
Yes, there's nothing 'dangerous' or license-violating about it, but it seems analogous to writing the same block of code a bunch of times when a loop would be better. And it isn't really extensible. How many duplicates is enough? Almost guaranteed it's going to be one more than I currently h

Re: IDE 'Reset'

2011-05-11 Thread David Glass
How do I get access to this? E-mail customer service directly? On 05/10/2011 11:15 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: David- This is one of the oldest and most annoying bugs in the bug database (bug #1061 dating from 2003 and rev 2.1.2). The last comment from the rev team is from Mark Waddingham in 2004..

Re: IDE 'Reset'

2011-05-11 Thread Richard Gaskin
Tereza Snyder wrote: > On May 11, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote: > >> * gAppStack is a great way for everything in your project to know >> which stack is the mainstack of the standalone, useful for all >> sorts of things like setting up paths to Components folders for >> storing librarie

Re: IDE 'Reset'

2011-05-11 Thread Tereza Snyder
On May 11, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote: > > * gAppStack is a great way for everything in your project to know which stack > is the mainstack of the standalone, useful for all sorts of things like > setting up paths to Components folders for storing libraries and externals. Slightly

Re: IDE 'Reset'

2011-05-11 Thread Richard Gaskin
David Glass wrote: I often am working on more than one project at a time, and am trying to come up with a way to do it in LC, particularly when using the GLX framework which creates a bunch of support stacks. LC doesn't allow duplicate stack names, so when I go to open another project I get the

Re: IDE 'Reset'

2011-05-11 Thread tkuyp...@telenet.be
Just my two cents... To prevent this, I always name my stacks with a prefix... So when the project is called "mySampleApp", I name each substack with a prefix: mySampleApp msa_Main msa_Preferences msa_whatever This way I'm always able to ope

Re: IDE 'Reset'

2011-05-10 Thread stephen barncard
Actually using multiple instances of Livecode is fine, and what Trevor recommended to avoid namespace conflict in his live seminar demonstrating the framework. On 10 May 2011 22:52, David Glass wrote: > > The brute force way would be to have multiple copies of LC running, but > that is not real

Re: IDE 'Reset'

2011-05-10 Thread Mark Wieder
David- This is one of the oldest and most annoying bugs in the bug database (bug #1061 dating from 2003 and rev 2.1.2). The last comment from the rev team is from Mark Waddingham in 2004... "Re-assigning to engine team for future re-assignment." I think for RevLive2014 we should have a celebrati