Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you want but I think my code does that.
For example, let's say tSender is "Apple":
set tSwitchApple to (tSender is not "Apple") --> false
set tSwitchPeach to (tSender is not "Peach") --> true
set tSwitchGrape to (tSender is not "Grape") --> true
Looking at your co
You can always use 'switch' without specifying an expression to evaluate
as part of the 'switch' line, like so:
switch
case (tSender is not "Apple")
put true into tSwitchApple
--break
case (tSender is not "Peach")
put true into tSwitchPeach
This won’t work for me because ALL the switches always have to be set to true,
except for the one related sender.
On Aug 4, 2015, at 2:40 PM, Peter Haworth wrote:
> You could:
>
> set tSwitchApple to (tSender is not "Apple")
> set tSwitchPeach to (tSender is not "Peach")
> set tSwitchGrape to
Hi.
Your if-then would be better served as:
on doThisThing tSender
if tSender is not “Apple” then set tSwitchApple to true
else if Sender is not “Peach” then set tSwitchPeach to true
else if Sender is not “Grape” then set tSwitchGrape to true
end doThisThing
The switc
One option, if I understand what you're asking:
on doThisThing tSender
repeat for each item theVar in "Apple,Peach,Grape"
do "put (tSender <> theVar) into" && ("tSwitch" & theVar)
end repeat
end doThisThing
Regards,
Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, UX/UI Design
On 8/
You could:
set tSwitchApple to (tSender is not "Apple")
set tSwitchPeach to (tSender is not "Peach")
set tSwitchGrape to (tSender is not "Grape")
Slightly different than your code because the switches would be set to
false if the condition isn't met whereas you code doesn't do that.
On Tue, Aug
