On 4/4/13 5:04 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Richard Gaskin writes:
Hmmm...I had thought there were more things than I see there. If that's
the complete list, I didn't see anything there about 64-bit.
What I see is:
357k Resolution independence
376k Pluggable themes
405k Cocoa
417k Physics en
Richard Gaskin writes:
> Hmmm...I had thought there were more things than I see there. If that's
> the complete list, I didn't see anything there about 64-bit.
What I see is:
357k Resolution independence
376k Pluggable themes
405k Cocoa
417k Physics engine
424k Windows8+phone theme
434k
Mark Wieder wrote:
Richard Gaskin writes:
I had thought that 64-bit support was one of the Kickstarter stretch
goals, but I can no longer find a complete list of all of the stretch goals.
Anyone here have a URL to those?
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1755283828/open-source-edition-of-
Richard Gaskin writes:
> I had thought that 64-bit support was one of the Kickstarter stretch
> goals, but I can no longer find a complete list of all of the stretch goals.
>
> Anyone here have a URL to those?
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1755283828/open-source-edition-of-livecode/posts
Hmm probably was but my memory is always a fuzzy sinkhole. Some days I have
to go outside to remember the sky is blue.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Richard Gaskin
wrote:
> Mike Bonner wrote:
>
>> LC is still 32 bit, so even if the newer versions were ok for cgi it
>> wouldn't work without the
Mike Bonner wrote:
LC is still 32 bit, so even if the newer versions were ok for cgi it
wouldn't work without the 32 bit libs. LC server has the same limitation. I
too look forward to the open sourcing so some of this can be addressed.
I had thought that 64-bit support was one of the Kickstarte
LC is still 32 bit, so even if the newer versions were ok for cgi it
wouldn't work without the 32 bit libs. LC server has the same limitation. I
too look forward to the open sourcing so some of this can be addressed.
When they ask you what is in the 32 bit libs and what specific libs you
need you
On 4/4/13 12:05 AM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Jacque-
Wednesday, April 3, 2013, 9:41:23 PM, you wrote:
The good news is that every time I complain on their forum, an admin
steps in and answers my ticket. They shouldn't reward that kind of behavior.
Maybe it's time for you to get a new host. I under
Jacque-
Wednesday, April 3, 2013, 9:41:23 PM, you wrote:
> The good news is that every time I complain on their forum, an admin
> steps in and answers my ticket. They shouldn't reward that kind of behavior.
Maybe it's time for you to get a new host. I understand on-rev has
some nice things avail
On 4/3/13 11:18 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Jacque-
Wednesday, April 3, 2013, 8:21:46 PM, you wrote:
They did move me to 64 bit hardware. You guys were right.
Slow progress...they said "what libraries do you need?" So, who's got a
link to the 32-bit compatibility libs? Or what exactly do I tell th
Jacque-
Wednesday, April 3, 2013, 8:21:46 PM, you wrote:
>> They did move me to 64 bit hardware. You guys were right.
>>
>> Slow progress...they said "what libraries do you need?" So, who's got a
>> link to the 32-bit compatibility libs? Or what exactly do I tell them? I
>> mean, like, what's it
On 4/3/13 9:56 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 4/3/13 6:44 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
I've asked them about the 64-bit thing, we'll see what they say. Would
lack of compatibility cause the engine to think the libraries aren't
there?
They did move me to 64 bit hardware. You guys were right.
Slow
On 4/3/13 7:12 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Roger Eller writes:
And the t-shirt reads: "Yeah, I grok symlinks."
Want.
We should have them printed up. I just bought the sandwich shirt from
xkcd, might as well have a whole set.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
H
On 4/3/13 6:44 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
I've asked them about the 64-bit thing, we'll see what they say. Would
lack of compatibility cause the engine to think the libraries aren't there?
They did move me to 64 bit hardware. You guys were right.
Slow progress...they said "what libraries do y
Probably. I think.
>I've asked them about the 64-bit thing, we'll see what they say. Would
lack of compatibility cause the engine to think the libraries aren't there?
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Jerry Jensen wrote:
> On Apr 3, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
>
> > Roger Eller write
On Apr 3, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
> Roger Eller writes:
>
>> And the t-shirt reads: "Yeah, I grok symlinks."
>
> Want.
Mmmm - char grilled with mustard!
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this ur
Roger Eller writes:
> And the t-shirt reads: "Yeah, I grok symlinks."
Want.
--
Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subsc
And the t-shirt reads: "Yeah, I grok symlinks." I can see it catching
on. :-)
On Apr 3, 2013 7:45 PM, "J. Landman Gay" wrote:
> On 4/3/13 6:21 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
>
>> J. Landman Gay writes:
>>
>> Now, it occurs to me that libX11.so.6 <> libX11.so.6.2 and
>>> libXext.so.6.4 <> libXext.so
On 4/3/13 6:21 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
J. Landman Gay writes:
Now, it occurs to me that libX11.so.6 <> libX11.so.6.2 and
libXext.so.6.4 <> libXext.so.6
No, that's all fine. It's just linux's way of saying that you can use a
shorthand way of getting to the libraries and if the version gets upd
J. Landman Gay writes:
> Now, it occurs to me that libX11.so.6 <> libX11.so.6.2 and
> libXext.so.6.4 <> libXext.so.6
No, that's all fine. It's just linux's way of saying that you can use a
shorthand way of getting to the libraries and if the version gets updated
it's not going to break.
If the
On 4/3/13 5:25 PM, Mike Bonner wrote:
Yeah it does but its all greek to me too. Well ok. yeah it shows where they
are or should be. I don't recall enough of what I know to know if found
library is the 32 bit or 64 bit. So I guess the answer is yes.. or no.
Need a geekier head than mine to fe
Yeah it does but its all greek to me too. Well ok. yeah it shows where they
are or should be. I don't recall enough of what I know to know if found
library is the 32 bit or 64 bit. So I guess the answer is yes.. or no.
Need a geekier head than mine to ferret it out.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:0
On 4/3/13 5:03 PM, Mike Bonner wrote:
Don't think its a robust answer, but I think its possible to use an
.htaccess file that points to whatever library paths you need by using the
SETENV directive. Doesn't solve the problem of knowing WHERE to point to
solve the issue though. (might be able to h
Don't think its a robust answer, but I think its possible to use an
.htaccess file that points to whatever library paths you need by using the
SETENV directive. Doesn't solve the problem of knowing WHERE to point to
solve the issue though. (might be able to hand install libraries in your
userspace
On 4/3/13 4:04 PM, Mike Bonner wrote:
My vote would go to the 64 bit issue also. If thats it, might write to
support and see if they'll install the 32 bit compatibility libraries.
Richard walked me through some stuff over the phone. Talk about kindness.
The libraries are installed but the rev
Mike Bonner writes:
> My vote would go to the 64 bit issue also. If thats it, might write to
> support and see if they'll install the 32 bit compatibility libraries.
Yep, that gets my vote, too.
--
Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
___
use-li
My vote would go to the 64 bit issue also. If thats it, might write to
support and see if they'll install the 32 bit compatibility libraries.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:45 PM, stephen barncard <
stephenrevoluti...@barncard.com> wrote:
> Is this about the 64-bit issue?
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013
Is this about the 64-bit issue?
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Richard Gaskin
wrote:
> J. Landman Gay wrote:
>
> My hosting provider moved my server to a new machine yesterday and all
>> my LiveCode CGI scripts immediately started throwing unspecified 500
>> server errors. These scripts have
J. Landman Gay wrote:
My hosting provider moved my server to a new machine yesterday and all
my LiveCode CGI scripts immediately started throwing unspecified 500
server errors. These scripts have been working well for years until they
changed machines on me.
I had them run ldd and all libraries
29 matches
Mail list logo
