On 3/4/11 2:18 PM, dunb...@aol.com wrote:
If I have this in a button script:
on mouseUp
checkBack
end mouseUp
and this in a stack script:
on checkBack
put ""
wait 20
put random(99)
end checkBack
and then insert that stack script into back, I still only get
> one random number.
On 3/4/11 8:51 PM, Sarah Reichelt wrote:
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 6:04 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
Somebody preserve my sanity here...
Sorry, you've been talking to associating with all of us here for too
long... there is now no way to preserve sanity :-)
I'm afraid you may be right...
I've b
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 6:04 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
> Somebody preserve my sanity here...
Sorry, you've been talking to associating with all of us here for too
long... there is now no way to preserve sanity :-)
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-live
You would have to pass checkBack for that to be a valid test wouldn't you?
Bob
On Mar 4, 2011, at 12:18 PM, dunb...@aol.com wrote:
> Jacques:
>
>
> If I have this in a button script:
>
>
> on mouseUp
> checkBack
> end mouseUp
>
>
> and this in a stack script:
>
>
>
> on checkBack
> p
Jacques:
If I have this in a button script:
on mouseUp
checkBack
end mouseUp
and this in a stack script:
on checkBack
put ""
wait 20
put random(99)
end checkBack
and then insert that stack script into back, I still only get one random
number. Is that what you meant, that y
