RE: Idea about Norton

2017-01-23 Thread tbodine via use-livecode
Looks like we'd have to request user to disable or ignore both AV SW and Microsoft's Smartscreen (Win 8 and 10) before installation. As a Norton user myself, I just downloaded on Windows 10 a code signed test file of my own, and Norton's screens were less off-putting and more informative than Micro

RE: Idea about Norton

2017-01-23 Thread Ralph DiMola via use-livecode
I have a Adobe CC business account. When the problem requires a re-install Adobe tech support always has me disable AV SW on any of the PCs with CC installed. If Adobe requires turning off the AV SW to install CC components then why would it be a problem for LC SW distribution to require the same?

Re: Idea about Norton

2017-01-23 Thread tbodine via use-livecode
Or, NOT off-list. Tom -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Idea-about-Norton-tp4711879p4711882.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ use-livecode mailing list use-liv

Re: Idea about Norton

2017-01-23 Thread Mike Kerner via use-livecode
I think AV authors were onto this trick a long time ago. I've asked LC to look into seeing what can be done about this (mainly by contacting Norton), because we use NAV at our company, and for every new compile of every desktop app, we have to manually approve it on every workstation. On Mon, Jan

Re: Idea about Norton

2017-01-23 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
I think this is the wrong way to go about it. I don't think Norton simply counts the number of times software attempts to install without signing, and then has a threshold where it accepts the unsigned installation without challenge. I have noticed however that sometimes installation instruction