I ran the original code on my MacBook Pro (16in 2019, 2.3GHx 8 core i9). Three
quarters of the results were over 4000, almost 150 of those were 4400 or above.
The highest value was 4493.
Average: 3873 (rounded)
Median: 4081
Standard Deviation: 611 (rounded)
k
__
Hi.
I rand this a few times on an iMac 3.2Ghz Intel I5
I got very consistent counts, averaging 2605, and most count deviating very
little from that value
Craig
> On Apr 8, 2021, at 1:24 AM, Mark Wieder via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> On 4/7/21 9:38 PM, Tom Glod via use-livecode wrote:
>> I he
On 4/7/21 9:38 PM, Tom Glod via use-livecode wrote:
I hear you Sean ..it is pretty interesting These are like gritty
details about the engine, and I love learning them.
I did not expect less than a microsecond / operation, thats for sure.
There are a few other operations I would like to test
I hear you Sean ..it is pretty interesting These are like gritty
details about the engine, and I love learning them.
I did not expect less than a microsecond / operation, thats for sure.
There are a few other operations I would like to test in this way.
thanks for reminding me about the detail
Hi Tom
It is really interesting to see the results from this though. Tried it on
my various machines and got pretty much the same results as everyone else
consistently. It's amazing to see that in the region of 3000 loops occur in
the period of 1ms. which means we are perhaps getting 1 (lowish lev
Excellent ... Yes the 1st one was usually the one that was the lowest for
me, for the reason you described.
But you also cleared up the mysterious big jumps,I too now get a consistent
result.
Thanks for chimming in
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 3:59 PM Niggemann, Bernd via use-livecode <
use-livecode@li
I tried this and got pretty constant results except for maybe the first ten
iterations. I figured if you just jump in with the milliseconds you would not
be at the "beginning" of the milliseconds and added a repeat loop to mitigate
that effect. Furthermore I appended the result to a variable.
I think I realized the problem will test to confirm. I think the Max is
actually what the avg should be. I think the writing to the variable is
what increases the time between those queries.
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 12:58 PM Ralph DiMola via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
I closed everything down to make sure the core was being used as little as
possible.
It didn't make a difference in the counts or the variance I reported
earlier.
I guess its not important, but it sure is curious.
I think it means the engine is busy with something most of the time, and
once in a wh
I added an average. i7-6700 3.4GHz 8 cores in the VM
Run 1:
Max==>4586
Min==>460
Average==>3096.058
Run 2:
Max==>7573
Min==>460
Average==>3835.764743
Run 3:
Max==>7573
Min==>728
Average==>2947.388
Interesting
Ralph DiMola
IT Director
Evergreen Information Services
rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
I scanned the results after it was done and got this:
Max==>3959
Min==>1015
Ralph DiMola
IT Director
Evergreen Information Services
rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
-Original Message-
From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf
Of Tom Glod via use-livecode
Sent
Hmmm I averaged about 3500. but every so often 7000+.
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 12:17 PM Ralph DiMola via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> Here's the first few from LC 9.6.1 Win 10 Pro VM SSD
>
> 1473
> 3326
> 3397
> 3155
> 2442
> 3234
> 2292
> 3349
> 3380
> 327
Here's the first few from LC 9.6.1 Win 10 Pro VM SSD
1473
3326
3397
3155
2442
3234
2292
3349
3380
3275
3259
3498
3300
3634
3462
3228
3896
3762
3197
3186
2188
1461
2716
3358
2940
2886
2614
2264
3038
3322
3305
3372
3395
3418
2579
Ralph DiMola
IT Director
Evergreen Information Services
rdim...@ever
It averages around 3850 and 3900 every time I try. However, when I try to run
the test 1 times the average goes down to just above 3600.
BigSur on Xeon W 3GHz.
Best regards
Tore Nilsen
> 7. apr. 2021 kl. 18:03 skrev Tom Glod via use-livecode
> :
>
> Hey peeps,
>
> I wanted to measure how
14 matches
Mail list logo