On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
> I'll play some more tonight; they still don't seem to be talking . . .
>
They're launching and compiling, but not talking.
I have a field in master with
on closeField
write the text of me to process slave
end closeField
and the main s
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Andrew Kluthe wrote:
> I don't think this works with just a stackfile but a standalone.
>
To be clear, I'm doing this with the standalones. I've also tried master
within the IDE and slave as a standalone with the same results,
--
Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Monte Goulding <
mo...@sweattechnologies.com> wrote:
> So slApp isn't among the lines of the openProcesses? It should be.
>
Hmm, now it is; just checked. And I found it once last night in the force
quit dialog, but assumed that I had started it myself.
I'll pla
On 11/10/2013, at 2:08 AM, "Dr. Hawkins" wrote:
> I'm trying to launch a second livecode stack, but it isn't working.
>
> I created master.livecode and slave.livecod on the desktop.
>
> I give master a script of
>
> on openstack
> global slApp
>
> put "/Users/hawk/Desktop/slave/MacOSX/sl
If you want to launch the second stack in a separate process (with its
own LC session), it will have to be made into a standalone app. You can
only "launch" an app, which a stackfile is not.
If you just want to open the stack in your current LC session, you can
just open it, or go to it, or to
Am 10.10.2013 um 17:08 schrieb Dr. Hawkins :
> I'm trying to launch a second livecode stack, but it isn't working.
>
> I created master.livecode and slave.livecod on the desktop.
>
> I give master a script of
>
> on openstack
> global slApp
>
> put "/Users/hawk/Desktop/slave/MacOSX/slave.
I don't think this works with just a stackfile but a standalone.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
> I'm trying to launch a second livecode stack, but it isn't working.
>
> I created master.livecode and slave.livecod on the desktop.
>
> I give master a script of
>
> on openst
I'm trying to launch a second livecode stack, but it isn't working.
I created master.livecode and slave.livecod on the desktop.
I give master a script of
on openstack
global slApp
put "/Users/hawk/Desktop/slave/MacOSX/slave.app/Contents/MacOS/slave"
into slApp
answer "starting"
brea
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Monte Goulding
wrote:
> Yes it can... read from STDIO... write to STDOUT
>
> Or just parse the command line args... $1... $n where n is $#
>
Thanks; I need to play with this.
Command line arguments won't work; this would be passing SQL commands &
results back and
> Can a livecode standalone be the slave process? Could it around to
> periodically check for stdin and answer to stdout?
>
> This could be perfect for handling my lag issues . . .
Yes it can... read from STDIO... write to STDOUT
Or just parse the command line args... $1... $n where n is $#
This has really worked out well for me. Thanks again Monte!
Dr. Hawkins, I don't think there's any way to address a Livecode
standalone with a command line prompt if that's what you were asking but
I hope you find an answer to the lag issue you have.
Cheers,
Ray
On 10/8/2013 6:00 PM, Monte
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Monte Goulding
wrote:
> Ah, I assumed you didn't need to read from the process. If you don't need
> to read or know when it's done then:
> open process appPath&" "&srcPath&" "&trgPath for neither
>
Can a livecode standalone be the slave process? Could it around t
Ahh! Now it's really working well.
Monte, thanks. Very helpful.
Ray
On 10/8/2013 10:57 PM, Monte Goulding wrote:
On 09/10/2013, at 1:45 PM, Ray Horsley wrote:
First time using open process for me. Fascinating! Thanks Monte. Not quite
sure on the write and read syntax.
My original shell
On 09/10/2013, at 1:45 PM, Ray Horsley wrote:
> First time using open process for me. Fascinating! Thanks Monte. Not quite
> sure on the write and read syntax.
>
> My original shell command which works fine is:
> get shell(""&appPath&" "&srcPath&" "&trgPath&"")
> where the app is a command
First time using open process for me. Fascinating! Thanks Monte. Not
quite sure on the write and read syntax.
My original shell command which works fine is:
get shell(""&appPath&" "&srcPath&" "&trgPath&"")
where the app is a command line utility which converts a PDF file to
multiple JPEG's
Use open process for neither
Cheers
Monte
On 09/10/2013, at 8:19 AM, Ray Horsley wrote:
> I'm sending a shell command which is taking a long time. I'd like to send it
> in a way so scripts continue to run while the shell command runs in the
> background. I believe this is called 'passive mo
I'm sending a shell command which is taking a long time. I'd like to
send it in a way so scripts continue to run while the shell command runs
in the background. I believe this is called 'passive mode', not sure.
Anyway, any ideas?
___
use-livecode
17 matches
Mail list logo
