Richmond-
Monday, February 11, 2013, 10:45:38 AM, you wrote:
> Yes, indeed it is getting "re" -diculous: maybe we could retrench, return to
> reconsider my original question, if anyone can actually remember or
> recall what it was. LOL.
I can't say the OQ is high on my list of things to worry
On 02/11/2013 08:21 PM, Devin Asay wrote:
On Feb 11, 2013, at 11:05 AM, Robert Sneidar wrote:
Oooohhh I love word games! Refried! Refrigerator! Redeem!
;-)
On Feb 10, 2013, at 1:32 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Richmond-
Sunday, February 10, 2013, 12:37:31 PM, you wrote:
Thanks.
But that still
On Feb 11, 2013, at 11:05 AM, Robert Sneidar wrote:
> Oooohhh I love word games! Refried! Refrigerator! Redeem!
>
> ;-)
>
>
> On Feb 10, 2013, at 1:32 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
>
>> Richmond-
>>
>> Sunday, February 10, 2013, 12:37:31 PM, you wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks.
>>
>>> But that still doesn't
heh heh. good one.
Bob
On Feb 11, 2013, at 7:58 AM, Mark Wieder wrote:
> Peter-
>
> Monday, February 11, 2013, 4:33:11 AM, you wrote:
>
>> Reminds me of the bumper sticker I saw:
>> "I AM retired -- I was tired yesterday, and I'm tired again to day."
>
> Could be worse.
> Yesterday I was ta
Oooohhh I love word games! Refried! Refrigerator! Redeem!
;-)
On Feb 10, 2013, at 1:32 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
> Richmond-
>
> Sunday, February 10, 2013, 12:37:31 PM, you wrote:
>
>> Thanks.
>
>> But that still doesn't quite explain the 're' of 'repackaged'.
>
> Or the 're' of 'reduced'.
> O
Peter-
Monday, February 11, 2013, 4:33:11 AM, you wrote:
> Reminds me of the bumper sticker I saw:
> "I AM retired -- I was tired yesterday, and I'm tired again to day."
Could be worse.
Yesterday I was tardy.
--
-Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
___
On Feb 10, 2013, at 4:32 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
>> But that still doesn't quite explain the 're' of 'repackaged'.
>
> Or the 're' of 'reduced'.
> Or the 're' of 'relax'.
> Or the 're' of 'reality'.
Reminds me of the bumper sticker I saw:
"I AM retired -- I was tired yesterday, and I'm tired agai
Richmond Mathewson-2 wrote
> 1. Pre-Release Repackaged Version.
My guess is pre-release reorganized version, in preparation for the final
re-organized version.
-- M
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Open-Source-Livecode-a-few-daft-questi
On 2/10/13 2:17 PM, Richmond wrote:
I am having a wee problem understanding what a few things mean:
1. Pre-Release Repackaged Version.
What is being 'repackaged'?
My rough layman's analogy: I have a single gigantic stack of spaghetti
code that consists of millions of lines of script and thou
Richmond-
Sunday, February 10, 2013, 12:37:31 PM, you wrote:
> Thanks.
> But that still doesn't quite explain the 're' of 'repackaged'.
Or the 're' of 'reduced'.
Or the 're' of 'relax'.
Or the 're' of 'reality'.
--
-Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
___
I'm guessing that like other languages, C++ has packages. That is, a package is
a set of Classes (a Class being a set of related functions). If code grows over
20 years it could be that different Classes are put into a package based on the
least likeliness to introduce any issues, and not perhap
On 02/10/2013 10:30 PM, Colin Holgate wrote:
The repackaged one would be after a few months of tidying up the code. The
as-is one would be the code as it stands at the end of March.
Thanks.
But that still doesn't quite explain the 're' of 'repackaged'.
___
The repackaged one would be after a few months of tidying up the code. The
as-is one would be the code as it stands at the end of March.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and ma
I am having a wee problem understanding what a few things mean:
1. Pre-Release Repackaged Version.
What is being 'repackaged'? Surely the O-S version is being packaged
(not quite sure what 'packaged' means in reference to a digital download)
rather then 'repackaged'?
2. "As is" Open Source R
14 matches
Mail list logo
